1. he continued the legacy of following laws created to perpetuate british hegemony..as a matter of fact we are still tehered to it and many say that we cant make laws like the british as we will then have to create a mindset in the supporting structures like the the judiciary,police, IAS and the armed forces. 2. he was the creator of the babu raj and laid he foundation stones for the likes of industrialists who still have a strangle hold on us, his daughter created the monster called the ambanies who still pillage the countries vitals. 3. he could have brought in the land reforms instead he played safe and made a caucus of wealthy landlords in his cabinet and relegating the poor class representatives to a naught. 4. he wanted kashmir to be different from the countries' constitution , he felt the kashmiries were a notch higher. 5. thanks to the editor we are still the family's sycophants.
Not just India but any country making a beginning on its own 70 yrs ago the state had to be the main player in building the economy. We in the school days in the fifties had heard of only of Tata and Birla whom the CPI would castigate during election meetings linking them to the Congresswahlahs. Evidently there were no major PVT players who could build the non-existent infrastructure in the country which rightly Nehru initiated to build. These, besides the Industry/infrastructure included building of Institution of higher learning and science which produced the Engineers and scientists and rest as they say is history. On the political front easily he laid strongest foundations of a stable inclusive democracy putting even the communists into parliament he would proudly brag about because in those times jail was the only place for them in the west. If our democracy has withstood the ravages of time even while all around India countries lay in tatters and instability, one man who should get credit has to be Nehru , a person of strong character & integrity with unshakable faith in P-democracy. Frankly I shudder to think what would have been the fate of our nation if only these Hindu bigots and gaurakshaks had inherited the nation from the British! To that extent credit should go to the British too because right from Churchill onward they knew the dangers of the country going into wrong hands---feudal, faddists,caste/religious bigots.
Re: TO NAME ONE MAN BJP/MODI SHOULD BE INDEBTED TO ? NEHRU
by damodaran mohan on Jan 31, 2018 05:48 PM
(contd.) They made sure the right people took over Independent India. Unfortunately in case of Pakistan they failed or may be because of Jinnah’s premature demise. That way India did not fail thanks to Nehru and Patel even after premature death of MG.
Not just India but any country making a beginning on its own 70 yrs ago the state had to be the main player in building the economy. We in the school days in the fifties had heard of only of Tata and Birla whom the CPI would castigate during election meetings linking them to the Congresswahlahs. Evidently there were no major PVT players who could build the non-existent infrastructure in the country which rightly Nehru initiated to build. These, besides the Industry/infrastructure included building of Institution of higher learning and science which produced the Engineers and scientists and rest as they say is history. On the political front easily he laid strongest foundations of a stable inclusive democracy putting even the communists into parliament he would proudly brag about because in those times jail was the only place for them in the west. If our democracy has withstood the ravages of time even while all around India countries lay in tatters and instability, one man who should get credit has to be Nehru , a person of strong character & integrity with unshakable faith in P-democracy. Frankly I shudder to think what would have been the fate of our nation if only these Hindu bigots and gaurakshaks had inherited the nation from the British! To that extent credit should go to the British too because right from Churchill onward they knew the dangers of the country going into wrong hands---feudal, faddists,caste/religious bigots.
Re: TO NAME ONE MAN BJP/MODI SHOULD BE INDEBTED TO ? NEHRU
by damodaran mohan on Jan 31, 2018 05:48 PM
(contd.) They made sure the right people took over Independent India. Unfortunately in case of Pakistan they failed or may be because of Jinnah’s premature demise. That way India did not fail thanks to Nehru and Patel even after premature death of MG.
Yes,he has lots of contribution.But his failures: 1.Could not inculcate Nationalism/pride as Indian. 2.Obsessed/paronia with Bengalees like Netaji/Dr.Shyama Prasad/Air Marshal Subrata Mukherjee. 3.Ineffective/non-existance population control. 4.Unchecked/patronise corruption (Pratap Singh Kairon)/Hanging from Lamp Post? 5.Too soft with Muslims(Kashmir).In one stoke,he did huge harm to the country. 6.Not pragmatic on International Politics.(Isreal vs Arab)
Yes,he has lots of contribution.But his failures: 1.Could not inculcate Nationalism/pride as Indian. 2.Obsessed/paronia with Bengalees like Netaji/Dr.Shyama Prasad/Air Marshal Subrata Mukherjee. 3.Ineffective/non-existance population control. 4.Unchecked/patronise corruption (Pratap Singh Kairon)/Hanging from Lamp Post? 5.Too soft with Muslims(Kashmir).In one stoke,he did huge harm to the country. 6.Not pragmatic on International Politics.(Isreal vs Arab)
1. Kashmir got snatched 50% by Pakistan 2. Economy tanked due to his licence raj. 3. Ruined Kashmir by allowing article 370 4. Closing his eyes to China's blackmail, 5. Never tried to get India a security council seat. 6. Conceded Akshi Chin to China. 7. Sole reason for India losing to China in 1962.
ALWAYS REMEMBERED FATHER OF DYNASTY POLITICS IN INDIA, it's one of the saddest thing in Indian history that we had a prime minister like Nehru.misguided the nation at every occasion, his wrong policies never worked in the interest of the nation.there are countless debacles to prove his inability. think he was no better than rahul Gandhi.
Re: ROSE VS LOTOUS
by pk kh on Jan 28, 2018 06:59 PM
I think Its LOTUS and not what your have written....Who hates whom most you only can confirm as LOTUS don't have time for such cheap things..
Re: Re: ROSE VS LOTOUS
by Intel Midfield on Jan 29, 2018 03:37 PM
Rose stand for Edvina that's what this born womaniser and drunkard did all his life. Nehru was the worst thing that could have happened to India.
Britishers killed many freedom fighters in india. Bhagat singh and like one were hanged but nehru and gandhi were spared. What a ploy on ignorant indians at that time. Definitely its very unfortunate for the country. The very own existence of india is in danger now. Every day terrorists are gaining foothold in almost every part of the country. Kerala, West bengal, UP, karnatka, Bihar every where there is danger emanating from these ill faithed species.
Re: Nehru and Gandhi were pawns of Britishers
by sam on Jan 29, 2018 09:34 AM
RSS organisation was acted mainly as Informers and well wishers of english man where they enjoyed everything right from health to wealth . They have exactly opposite view of Independence rather than dependent . In simple terms they Pseudo Nationalist where as they act savers of corporate community