Discussion Board

Why India needs to thank Nehru


Total 99 messages Pages | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4   Older >
kaushal pandey
nehru , a white brown man.
by kaushal pandey on Feb 08, 2018 08:20 AM

we have to outgrow our fawning of nehru, why?

1. he continued the legacy of following laws created to perpetuate british hegemony..as a matter of fact we are still tehered to it and many say that we cant make laws like the british as we will then have to create a mindset in the supporting structures like the the judiciary,police, IAS and the armed forces.
2. he was the creator of the babu raj and laid he foundation stones for the likes of industrialists who still have a strangle hold on us, his daughter created the monster called the ambanies who still pillage the countries vitals.
3. he could have brought in the land reforms instead he played safe and made a caucus of wealthy landlords in his cabinet and relegating the poor class representatives to a naught.
4. he wanted kashmir to be different from the countries' constitution , he felt the kashmiries were a notch higher.
5. thanks to the editor we are still the family's sycophants.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
damodaran mohan
TO NAME ONE MAN BJP/MODI SHOULD BE INDEBTED TO ? NEHRU
by damodaran mohan on Jan 31, 2018 05:46 PM  | Hide replies

Not just India but any country making a beginning on its own 70 yrs ago the state had to be the main player in building the economy. We in the school days in the fifties had heard of only of Tata and Birla whom the CPI would castigate during election meetings linking them to the Congresswahlahs. Evidently there were no major PVT players who could build the non-existent infrastructure in the country which rightly Nehru initiated to build. These, besides the Industry/infrastructure included building of Institution of higher learning and science which produced the Engineers and scientists and rest as they say is history. On the political front easily he laid strongest foundations of a stable inclusive democracy putting even the communists into parliament he would proudly brag about because in those times jail was the only place for them in the west. If our democracy has withstood the ravages of time even while all around India countries lay in tatters and instability, one man who should get credit has to be Nehru , a person of strong character & integrity with unshakable faith in P-democracy. Frankly I shudder to think what would have been the fate of our nation if only these Hindu bigots and gaurakshaks had inherited the nation from the British! To that extent credit should go to the British too because right from Churchill onward they knew the dangers of the country going into wrong hands---feudal, faddists,caste/religious bigots.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
damodaran mohan
Re: TO NAME ONE MAN BJP/MODI SHOULD BE INDEBTED TO ? NEHRU
by damodaran mohan on Jan 31, 2018 05:48 PM
(contd.) They made sure the right people took over Independent India. Unfortunately in case of Pakistan they failed or may be because of Jinnah’s premature demise. That way India did not fail thanks to Nehru and Patel even after premature death of MG.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
damodaran mohan
TO NAME ONE MAN BJP/MODI SHOULD BE INDEBTED TO ? NEHRU
by damodaran mohan on Jan 31, 2018 05:45 PM  | Hide replies

Not just India but any country making a beginning on its own 70 yrs ago the state had to be the main player in building the economy. We in the school days in the fifties had heard of only of Tata and Birla whom the CPI would castigate during election meetings linking them to the Congresswahlahs. Evidently there were no major PVT players who could build the non-existent infrastructure in the country which rightly Nehru initiated to build. These, besides the Industry/infrastructure included building of Institution of higher learning and science which produced the Engineers and scientists and rest as they say is history. On the political front easily he laid strongest foundations of a stable inclusive democracy putting even the communists into parliament he would proudly brag about because in those times jail was the only place for them in the west. If our democracy has withstood the ravages of time even while all around India countries lay in tatters and instability, one man who should get credit has to be Nehru , a person of strong character & integrity with unshakable faith in P-democracy. Frankly I shudder to think what would have been the fate of our nation if only these Hindu bigots and gaurakshaks had inherited the nation from the British! To that extent credit should go to the British too because right from Churchill onward they knew the dangers of the country going into wrong hands---feudal, faddists,caste/religious bigots.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
damodaran mohan
Re: TO NAME ONE MAN BJP/MODI SHOULD BE INDEBTED TO ? NEHRU
by damodaran mohan on Jan 31, 2018 05:48 PM
(contd.) They made sure the right people took over Independent India. Unfortunately in case of Pakistan they failed or may be because of Jinnah’s premature demise. That way India did not fail thanks to Nehru and Patel even after premature death of MG.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
subhas sengupta
Nehru
by subhas sengupta on Jan 30, 2018 02:27 AM  | Hide replies

Yes,he has lots of contribution.But his failures:
1.Could not inculcate Nationalism/pride as Indian.
2.Obsessed/paronia with Bengalees like Netaji/Dr.Shyama Prasad/Air Marshal Subrata Mukherjee.
3.Ineffective/non-existance population control.
4.Unchecked/patronise corruption (Pratap Singh Kairon)/Hanging from Lamp Post?
5.Too soft with Muslims(Kashmir).In one stoke,he did huge harm to the country.
6.Not pragmatic on International Politics.(Isreal vs Arab)

    Forward  |  Report abuse
rajendra tare
Re: Nehru
by rajendra tare on Feb 08, 2018 09:00 AM
what about affinity for females???

   Forward   |   Report abuse
subhas sengupta
Nehru
by subhas sengupta on Jan 30, 2018 02:05 AM

Yes,he has lots of contribution.But his failures:
1.Could not inculcate Nationalism/pride as Indian.
2.Obsessed/paronia with Bengalees like Netaji/Dr.Shyama Prasad/Air Marshal Subrata Mukherjee.
3.Ineffective/non-existance population control.
4.Unchecked/patronise corruption (Pratap Singh Kairon)/Hanging from Lamp Post?
5.Too soft with Muslims(Kashmir).In one stoke,he did huge harm to the country.
6.Not pragmatic on International Politics.(Isreal vs Arab)

    Forward  |  Report abuse
rk singh
thank him for what??????
by rk singh on Jan 28, 2018 06:51 PM  | Hide replies

1. Kashmir got snatched 50% by Pakistan
2. Economy tanked due to his licence raj.
3. Ruined Kashmir by allowing article 370
4. Closing his eyes to China's blackmail,
5. Never tried to get India a security council seat.
6. Conceded Akshi Chin to China.
7. Sole reason for India losing to China in 1962.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Intel Midfield
Re: thank him for what??????
by Intel Midfield on Jan 29, 2018 03:32 PM
He's been awarded Bharat Ratna for these.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
sunil nair
JAWAHARLAL A SAD IMAGE OF INDIAN POLITICS.
by sunil nair on Jan 28, 2018 04:36 PM

ALWAYS REMEMBERED FATHER OF DYNASTY POLITICS IN INDIA,
it's one of the saddest thing in Indian history that we had a prime minister like Nehru.misguided the nation at every occasion, his wrong policies never worked in the interest of the nation.there are countless debacles to prove his inability.
think he was no better than rahul Gandhi.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
DINESH BARIK
ROSE VS LOTOUS
by DINESH BARIK on Jan 28, 2018 12:15 PM  | Hide replies

Rose stands for Love & Beauty whereas Lotous for creating Minority and hatred .

    Forward  |  Report abuse
pk kh
Re: ROSE VS LOTOUS
by pk kh on Jan 28, 2018 06:59 PM
I think Its LOTUS and not what your have written....Who hates whom most you only can confirm as LOTUS don't have time for such cheap things..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Intel Midfield
Re: Re: ROSE VS LOTOUS
by Intel Midfield on Jan 29, 2018 03:37 PM
Rose stand for Edvina that's what this born womaniser and drunkard did all his life. Nehru was the worst thing that could have happened to India.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
jo
Re: Re: Re: ROSE VS LOTOUS
by jo on Feb 08, 2018 08:46 AM
For that matter which leader is not a womaniser?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
ajay kumar
Nehru and Gandhi were pawns of Britishers
by ajay kumar on Jan 28, 2018 05:19 AM  | Hide replies

Britishers killed many freedom fighters in india. Bhagat singh and like one were hanged but nehru and gandhi were spared. What a ploy on ignorant indians at that time. Definitely its very unfortunate for the country. The very own existence of india is in danger now. Every day terrorists are gaining foothold in almost every part of the country. Kerala, West bengal, UP, karnatka, Bihar every where there is danger emanating from these ill faithed species.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
sam
Re: Nehru and Gandhi were pawns of Britishers
by sam on Jan 29, 2018 09:34 AM
RSS organisation was acted mainly as Informers and well wishers of english man where they enjoyed everything right from health to wealth . They have exactly opposite view of Independence rather than dependent . In simple terms they Pseudo Nationalist where as they act savers of corporate community

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 99 messages Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4   Older >
Write a message