Discussion Board View article

Total 23 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2
vijay shrivastav
NOTHING IS WRONG.
by vijay shrivastav on Jan 19, 2018 12:34 PM  | Hide replies

IF THERE IS ANYTHING WRONG THAN OTHER 20-JUDGES HAD ALSO COME OUT IN PUBLIC, BUT IT SEEMS THEY ALL ARE SATISFIED BY THERE JOB.SO IT LOOK LIKE THIS FOUR ARE ON WRONG TRACK.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Gautam Kar
Re: NOTHING IS WRONG.
by Gautam Kar on May 07, 2018 02:05 PM

SOMETHING IS WRONG WHICH IS REDIFF AND MEDIA AND THEIR MASTERS

   Forward   |   Report abuse
susarla suryaprakasam
Why are judges' disputes coming out in the open?
by susarla suryaprakasam on Jan 19, 2018 12:28 PM

Because they have become larger than the Government that employs them, larger than POI, and 3 hoots to Parliament that passes the laws / amendments.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
susarla suryaprakasam
Why are judges' disputes coming out in the open?
by susarla suryaprakasam on Jan 19, 2018 12:28 PM

Because they have become larger than the Government that employs them, larger than POI, and 3 hoots to Parliament that passes the laws / amendments.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
subash chandra
legal position on discretion
by subash chandra on Jan 19, 2018 11:47 AM  | Hide replies

I do not know who is right or wrong among 5 judges. It can be decided after understanding how discretion is exercised.
If it is exercised judiciously, Then Cji may be right.
Otherwise Four Judges may be right
Present available information on media is not sufficient to arrive any conclusion
However we are of this view
In Indian circumstances,Appoinment etc of Judges should not be under any type of control of politicians
This present episode in Supreme Court should not be permitted to give power to politicians in interfering Judiciary


    Forward  |  Report abuse
venu  gopal
Re: legal position on discretion
by venu gopal on Jan 19, 2018 01:09 PM
Subash Chandra. Politicians are controlling the Judiciary. Once the names of Judges (selected) by cllegium , it is send to law ministry for approval, it is whims & fancy of govt of the day to pass he whole lot or retun back to collegium for review ,deletion, addition, etc.then when the govt approves only it goes to president for clearance. So how do you say politicians should not be given control. this is going on since independence.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
arungopal agarwal
Indiscipline
by arungopal agarwal on Jan 19, 2018 11:35 AM

Part of our culture post independence. Let us see how Modi tackles it, we have seen all intolerance, caste based division, religious based hate, etc.,etc., - part of political agenda, now judges too showing their bias approach to judicial system.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Why are judges' disputes coming out in the open?
by on Jan 19, 2018 11:24 AM  | Hide replies

The reason is obvious. They have personal interest in some of the cases, which were allocated to different benches by CJI as per procedure. In connivance with the Big Open Hand and the small Left Hand, they wanted to give per-determined judgements to those cases which were drifted away from under their feet. This frustrated them to revolt. If they got an opportunity to decide on those cases favoring their political masters. When this happens, if the next government of their favored political party comes into power, the revolted judges who are to retire in a few months, will be ion gravy train after their retirement.I don't know if my comments will be posted.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
janga sridhar
Re: Why are judges' disputes coming out in the open?
by janga sridhar on Jan 19, 2018 05:57 PM
You nailed it. It is not the roster system or constitution of benches. That thing is a charade. The real purpose was their personal interest in certain cases.
Those who dragged the SC to a press conference are not fit to be judges anymore.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
subash chandra
incorrect
by subash chandra on Jan 19, 2018 11:11 AM

In Indian circumstances,Appoinment of Judges should not be under any type of control of politicians
This present episode in Supreme Court should not be permitted to give power to politicians in interfering Judiciary


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 23 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2
Write a message