.The income share of India’s top 1% rose from approximately 6% in 1882 -1883 to above 10% a decade later and then to 15% in 2000 and further still around by 23% by 2014.This runs parallel to the period of Economic Reform,Market Economy,Privatization Non performing Mount build-up and scam islands. The national income share of bottom 50% -approximately 390 millions adults was just two thirds of the share of the 1% consisting of just 7.8 million people. ’Now we are by constitution amendment a socialistic country giving loans in the range of Rs.44000 to some select corporates, a corporate said it in open and the pity is the banks had not(?)said -to how many more Indians the Govt. can give loan disbursal like this- but with no party or individual M.P.questioning the correctness of this in Parliament.These had been in newspaper .But no party seems to be concerned about this and has not questioned those who brought about this situation.An Ex, Vice President has said :the situation is dismal."Still alas!! divisive policies are practiced to camouflage all these.R.Ponnambalam"
Let us forget all these .Let us look for the economic development of the country.That alongwith Education will change all these societal problems. That we have failed the county in our standing in the ladder of equity is said by Credit suisse quoted by the Ex.V.P. and by Research paper by Thomas Piketty and Lucas Chancel .The pity is neither the Indian Government nor the Indian Economicsdom had brought this out nor had studied it.those who caused this disatrous situation are doing all this destructive politics.It is not to speak for BJP or any other party's Govt.Whatever may be the ruling party the nation has to move forward.BJP or Congress no one is a paragon of virtues.The stand of the country as said in what was quoted is"Where do we stand on the ladder of equity ?Ex.V.P. had added quoting credit Suisse “while the top 10 percent controlled about 74 percent of total wealth the poorest 30 percent, meanwhile, had just 1.4 percent of the total wealth," The following is from from Thomas Piketty and Lucas Chancel web site WID.world Income inequality in India in 1930s >Top 1% earners captured 21% of total income.In the early 1980s that income for top 1% dropped to 6% ; There were set of socialist policies with strict govt.control over economy with an explicit goal to limit the power of the elite the report said.R.Ponnambalam
" BJP's online warriors today will declare that listening to the Dalit voices in Mumbai is dangerous, populist, even treasonous.":What the Congress had done for 60 out of 70 years for the upliftment of this societally down cast (NOT CASTE)people.The Country or Govt. had continuously kept them down cast with opportunities in low paying professions.How much money and other efforts had been done by Congress Govt and with what result.Affirmative Action in U.S.A was discussed in newspapers in India .At least learning from that what the Cong. govt had done for 60 years.If after 60 years of reservation they had not come up,it means Congress had to explain where it let them downR.Ponnambalam
" BJP's online warriors today will declare that listening to the Dalit voices in Mumbai is dangerous, populist, even treasonous.":What the Congress had done for 60 out of 70 years for the upliftment of this societally down cast (NOT CASTE)people.The Country or Govt. had continuously kept them down cast with opportunities in low paying professions.How much money and other efforts had been done by Congress Govt and with what result.Affirmative Action in U.S.A was discussed in newspapers in India .At least learning from that what the Cong. govt had done for 60 years.If after 60 years of reservation they had not come up,it means Congress had to explain where it let them downR.Ponnambalam
Secular' politics -- a politics organized around ensuring, first of all, that minorities of various kinds feel safe in this country. Secularism is India is a hoax where one religion is called majority and six other religions are said as minorities and one religion enjoys all benefits because it is treated as a Religion-vote lord like a Landlord .Why it is not six majorities and one (the Jews ) minority.Where does elsewhere such a definition exist? R.Ponnambalam
Re: Re: MaadharChodhsAre more in North India
by R ponnabalam on Jan 20, 2018 10:02 AM
Geography shows Maharastra in South India. So Maharastra is part of South India.They do not belong to the Dravidian set which is taken as Tamil,Malayalam,Telugu Kannada.R.Ponnambalam
Aspirations of hindoos be it OBCs, Dalits or uppercaste cannot be brushed aside as wishes of BJP. Hindoos have become aware and understand that their only chance of making it to the next century is staying united. They wish for a strong modern and united nation capable of giving a befitting reply to violent jehadi ideology of medieval times perpetuated by pakistan and its alliance partners aka marxists and lefteists. This is a wish of majority of Indians not only BJP.
