What's the author trying to convey? Do we trade Arunachal for peace with China? No! No man or woman in that state wants to be part of a Chinese entity. Historical connects are relevant only to a point. Pakistan was a part of India. So was Afghanistan. Should we claim these nations as part of our State. What I have written may not be exactly the author's view, but he doesn't seem to factor in the sensitivities of people in the disputed areas.
What's the author trying to convey? Do we trade Arunachal for peace with China? No! No man or woman in that state wants to be part of a Chinese entity. Historical connects are relevant only to a point. Pakistan was a part of India. So was Afghanistan. Should we claim these nations as part of our State. What I have written may not be exactly the author's view, but he doesn't seem to factor in the sensitivities of people in the disputed areas.
No possibility of war in between India and China, if at all it happens, India will have to penetrate deep at the weak points of China to have respectful negotiations with them later on.
INDIAN HAVE TO KEEP AGRESSIVE MINDSET WITH EYE ON ENEMY TERROTIRIES/LAND. INDIA SHOULD KEPT ALL OPTION OPEN IN DEALING WITH CHINA INCLUDING PENELTY OF CONSFICATE BALANCE OF TRADE PAYMENT APART FROM NUCLEAR OPTION.
INDIAN HAVE TO KEEP AGRESSIVE MINDSET WITH EYE ON ENEMY TERROTIRIES/LAND. INDIA SHOULD KEPT ALL OPTION OPEN IN DEALING WITH CHINA INCLUDING PENELTY OF CONSFICATE BALANCE OF TRADE PAYMENT APART FROM NUCLEAR OPTION.
