Does anyone remember the Nagarwala Case (late 60s or early 70s), the cashier from SBI who had given Rs 1 Lac to someone on the suspected basis of suspected phone call from suspected "Mother Of Parliament"- who later died mysteriously.
If at all there is a crisis, it is caused by the media which is known for it's sick , suspicious and manipulated reporting of every happening in the government.
Casting doubt in citizens in the name of 'bringing out the truth' is what the country's media is doing.
Gossip, Guess work, trivia and some sh^t called ANAYLSIS is let lose on unsuspecting readers there by causing damage to democracy.
Matter seems to be projected as crisis in Indian Democracy and by ill wishers Indian society. Frustration expression is very normal in govt,but in judiciary seems new. Such expression only will lead to healthy democracy.
PM should have a right to seek detailed information as he is entitled to run this country. He can be questioned if he interfere . If not PM then should I go and ask what the issue is?
If the 4 judges could call for a press conference, the PM has a right to know what has exactly happened. That the CJI was not wanting to respond is another story. Had the political parties joined hands and brought the disputing judges and the CJI, there would not have been a TAMASHA. If RaGa had the right to go before the Press, why not the PM?
If the 4 judges could call for a press conference, the PM has a right to know what has exactly happened. That the CJI was not wanting to respond is another story. Had the political parties joined hands and brought the disputing judges and the CJI, there would not have been a TAMASHA. If RaGa had the right to go before the Press, why not the PM?
