Re: Navy housing at Mumbai
by P S SHAH on Jan 12, 2018 09:31 AM
Gadkari is right. Althe navi officers want better accomodation in Mumbai posh area and want to object at the most of the projects where their permission is required. As compared to other arm forces and Air forces, they enjoyed comparatively better and easy life full of luxury. Gadkari is a senior central minister and he always talk with sense.
Re: Navy housing at Mumbai
by P S SHAH on Jan 12, 2018 09:31 AM
Gadkari is right. Althe navi officers want better accomodation in Mumbai posh area and want to object at the most of the projects where their permission is required. As compared to other arm forces and Air forces, they enjoyed comparatively better and easy life full of luxury. Gadkari is a senior central minister and he always talk with sense.
The ministers statement is in very bad taste. Does he want the Navy to stay permanently with their families at the border? Is that what he thinks of the defence forces? I think he should publically apologise.
Re: Gadkari's comments
by P S SHAH on Jan 12, 2018 09:33 AM
Think about the army and Airforce and see how they live and compare their life with that of Navy personnels.
Re: Re: Gadkari's comments
by Sunil Vaidya on Jan 12, 2018 12:28 PM
veda shah...there is simply no hope for you...you are beyond redemption...continue with your kraaaa,..kraaa....kraaa....
All the Armed forces Quarters need to be shifted to suit current needs of the country. Everyone is just sitting on the development done 50-60 years ago whilst everything else has grown.
so you want them to be always on sea? they should never come to land? come to home? they should have no social life at all...no holidays at all? is the navy your or indian citizen's slave?
Re: hi
by P S SHAH on Jan 12, 2018 09:38 AM
If navy unnecessarily put hurdles in the projects for development of the country, the ministers can also show his power and tell them what he can also do for them. Why Western command chief Girish Luthra, who was present didnt object to the statement of the minister ?
