Had he lived in August 15 1947, Mr. Nehru would not have been the 1st P.M. of India. Therefore, even Britishers wanted him alive to torture Mr. Bose. As both were happy to hear news of the death of Mr. Bose. they did not pursue the matter. Mr.Bose's death was a tremendous loss the true Indians.
Had he lived in August 15 1947, Mr. Nehru would not have been the 1st P.M. of India. Therefore, even Britishers wanted him alive to torture Mr. Bose. As both were happy to hear news of the death of Mr. Bose. they did not pursue the matter. Mr.Bose's death was a tremendous loss the true Indians.
Re: Mr. Subhaschandra Bose.
by raj on Feb 25, 2018 05:38 PM
bose death.. a loss for india as oppopition party.....yes....but he is no way better than NEHRU..
every person who loved Subhash Chandra Bose carries him till his end, nobody dies who has not completed his commitment, or is not happy till end, since he cannot do what he wished with many hearts together.
Mr Ashis Roy's confirmation of Subhas's death may be examined in the following light 1. The plane which was, inter alia, carrying Subhas had developed engine trouble on 17.8.1945 evening so the pilot did not venture to go to Taipe that night and halted at an unknown airportTourane at Indochina Coast. Next morning OK and the plane reached Taipe-when ? Why was not the plane checked in Type (previous Formosa ) when there was trouble ? The plain crashed on the runaway-- is there any report of crash of 18th August 1945 ? 2. Where is the report of the Japanese Govt confirming the death of Chandra Bose ? Why it is not shown in the article ? 3. Where is the death certificate and who certified the death ? Under which act the death was registered ? 4. Where was the body burned and is there any record of disposal of the body ? 5.Why there is no photograph of either of Habibur Rehman and Subhas in burnt conditions ? 6.Whether the Japan Govt report dated 15.9.1945 was internationally circulated ? Was it at all circulated in any Indian newspaper at that time ? 7.Was this fact mentioned in the INA trial ? 8. If the said Japan Govt report did hold the truth why the tag of war criminal on Subhas was not taken off ? 9. Did the Allies believe in the statement of Japan Govt it would have been referred in the Nurnburg trial or in Tokeyo trial later on. 10.After so many committees, commissions and private inquiries failing to come to conclusive decision this report is too biased to be accepted
Congress supporter Karan Thaper needed to publish it now. Further he has not elaborated how old is this finding and why in 1918 , prior to 1919 , it is needed to be brought. In fact the time of revealing the news is creating doubt in the facts by it self , all that news of his death was spread after the incident to save him from the Britisher's clutches, if Neta ji was caught by Britishers he would have been hanged for his act of fighting against Britain. Where as lot many literature published earlier in which his accidental death was doubted. And there were another set of articles in which he was seen in different countries including India. Further, there was treaty between India,ruled by Nehru and England that all the war criminals will be handed over to British power. And Subhash Chandra Bose too was considered one such criminal who fought against British power. So I doubt Karan Thaper's content and his intention too.
Re: Politically motivated news
by aam admi on Feb 25, 2018 12:52 PM
Correction in 2nd line: read....'2018, prior to 2019', instead ....'1918,prior to 1919',... mistake is regretted.
