'identify-and-fix-the-problem' method, namely, people will vote for you if you give them what they need. It is, if you will, a highly effective -- but municipal -- approach to running a country. What use having policies if the result is not good enough?What matters is the result. India had had all policies for 70 yrs with the poor results.”but municipal –“How many Municipalities are well run?Now if it is accepted as Municipal approach what had been the result of running this Country with every Non Municipal approach? “Where do we stand on the ladder of equity? This is a question that citizens of the republic can ask the state after 70 years of legislating welfare laws and adjudicating measures to deliver social justice.""The ground reality is dismal," he(Hamid Ansari) said during the inaugural address at the 9th National Conference of the Indian Association of Lawyers here. while the top 10 percent controlled about 74 percent of it. The poorest 30 percent, meanwhile, had just 1.4 percent of the total wealth.Also add to it the what is said in the research paper of Research paper by Thomas Piketty and Lucas web site WID.world R.Ponnambalam
'identify-and-fix-the-problem' method, namely, people will vote for you if you give them what they need. It is, if you will, a highly effective -- but municipal -- approach to running a country. What use having policies if the result is not good enough?What matters is the result. India had had all policies for 70 yrs with the poor results.”but municipal –“How many Municipalities are well run?Now if it is accepted as Municipal approach what had been the result of running this Country with every Non Municipal approach? “Where do we stand on the ladder of equity? This is a question that citizens of the republic can ask the state after 70 years of legislating welfare laws and adjudicating measures to deliver social justice.""The ground reality is dismal," he(Hamid Ansari) said during the inaugural address at the 9th National Conference of the Indian Association of Lawyers here. while the top 10 percent controlled about 74 percent of it. The poorest 30 percent, meanwhile, had just 1.4 percent of the total wealth.Also add to it the what is said in the research paper of Research paper by Thomas Piketty and Lucas web site WID.world.We don't take yearly GDP growth %to market to buy our needs R.Ponnambalam R.Ponnambalam
For instance, 20% North Indians AreMaadharChods but that rate is less than 1% in South India.
According to me South India means Kerala, TN, AP, Karnataka, Telangana and Maharashtra, where major offences like murders, rapes, big robberies are less. NEXT, IN SOUTH CRIMES ARE BETTER REPORTED and media is highly active whereas in North, crimes get attention only when recorded on CCTVs, some passersby notice & report or when they explode otherwise into big issues.
North means all other states except South India and Orissa, Assam and North-Eastern states. Even in Orissa, I find crime rate to be less.
Delhi, UP, Haryana, Punjab and Bihar are the worst places where MaadharChodhsAre highest in proportion.
MaadharChodhsInclude rapists, robbers, dacoits, murderers, religious extremists, corrupt fellows, corrupt govt officials, dirty politicians, etc (notwithstanding the literal meaning of the term).
Just like credit rating, there should be criminality rating. It should be made mandatory to hang or shoot 100,000 criminals pan-India every year, irrespective whether they are South Indians or North Indians. Everyday at least 55 criminals (20,000 per year including Jats, Yadavs, Gujjars, IzlamicCriminals, etc) should be hanged in NCR, Noida and Haryana. All Indians (South or North) need conscience-development training, but there should be special focus on North Indians.
