Discussion Board View article

Total 77 messages Pages | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4   Older >
R  ponnabalam
No escape from Indra is India
by R ponnabalam on Dec 26, 2018 08:23 AM

Even out of Power Congress is so Powerful.One cannot but exonerate it for everything wrong it had done to the country.Long Live Indra is India,India is Indra." If anyone asks why you say so tell..we meant not Mrs.Gandhi butLord Indra.R.PONNAMBALAM

    Forward  |  Report abuse
arungopal agarwal
Muslims
by arungopal agarwal on Dec 18, 2018 01:11 PM

Next step must be to make them secular first, they have been exploited by politicians as vote bank, never cared for their welfare rather unwanted population increase is maximum with them.
Why a muslim should have hate for BJP who is ruling at present, even if not - a big force in public. All is created by politicians only.
We demand total secularisation of all political parties and bar all such nuisance who spread hate among masses and distinguish among religion, caste or region.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Samir Kamal
It was again perpetrated by a particular religious community
by Samir Kamal on Dec 18, 2018 12:33 PM

Though this riot was under the patron of congress but in no case you will see that sikh-congressi or muslim-congressi for that matter were involved in this massacre. Instead, you will notice that, as usual a, particular community were involved in genocide under the umbrella of congress AND they do this all the time under different tag like R55 or its sister concern.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Samir Kamal
It was again perpetrated by a particular religious community
by Samir Kamal on Dec 18, 2018 12:33 PM

Though this riot was under the patron of congress but in no case you will see that sikh-congressi or muslim-congressi for that matter were involved in this massacre. Instead, you will notice that, as usual a, particular community were involved in genocide under the umbrella of congress AND they do this all the time under different tag like R55 or its sister concern.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Samir Kamal
It was again perpetrated by a particular religious community
by Samir Kamal on Dec 18, 2018 12:32 PM

Though this riot was under the patron of congress but in no case you will see that sikh-congressi or muslim-congressi for that matter were involved in this massacre. Instead, you will notice that, as usual a, particular community were involved in genocide under the umbrella of congress AND they do this all the time under different tag like R55 or its sister concern.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
BP Mohanta
compare
by BP Mohanta on Dec 18, 2018 12:09 PM  | Hide replies

we can not compare 2002 vs 1984 killing.2002 was a danga and two religious people were killing each and others and one religious people were more killed but in1984 was a one sided only particular one religious people were killed by a particular political party members and lovers.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Samir Kamal
Re: compare
by Samir Kamal on Dec 18, 2018 12:35 PM
Though this rriot was under the patron of congress but in no case you will see that 5sikh-congressi or 1muslim-congressi, for that matter, were involved in this mmassacre. Instead, you will notice that, as usual a, particular ccommunity people were involved in this ggenocide under the umbrella of congress AND they do this all the time under different tag like R55 or its ssister concern.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
anil Kumar
Very Strange
by anil Kumar on Dec 18, 2018 12:02 PM

But what about Kashmiri Hindus who never took weapons for any independence fight as some SIKHS & MUSLIMS did.
Kashmiri Hindus were thrown out from their homeland for no cause. SHAME SHAME, THIS IS SERIOUS GENOCIDE.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
(null)
1984 was the beginning, followed by 1992 and 2002'
by (null) on Dec 18, 2018 10:49 AM  | Hide replies

Wrong. Even before 1984 I have witnessed two riots in Jamshedpur. The riots on religious lines started in 1947 and that was the beginning. The biggest blunder India did was accommodating the minorities instead of sending them to Pakistan.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
ASHOK UPADHYAYA
Re: 1984 was the beginning, followed by 1992 and 2002'
by ASHOK UPADHYAYA on Dec 18, 2018 11:04 AM
True... Hindu Rashtra should have been declared....with common civil code.... no appeasement Minority... All citizens....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sandeep Singh
Re: Re: 1984 was the beginning, followed by 1992 and 2002'
by Sandeep Singh on Dec 18, 2018 12:05 PM
The biggest reality>> The hindus were never ever in the history and will never be united for Hindu Rashtra!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
ASHOK UPADHYAYA
Re: Re: Re: 1984 was the beginning, followed by 1992 and 2002'
by ASHOK UPADHYAYA on Dec 26, 2018 01:25 PM
This the main draw back of Hindus... therefore they are ruled 600 years by Moghuls ... but Angrej though ruled for 200;years but gave freedom from M rulers... and many other developments...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 77 messages Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4   Older >
Write a message