Re: 1984
by Sun on Dec 18, 2018 12:02 AM
How can you forget lacs of Hindus killed in Punjab before and after 1984 by Sikh terrorists and extremists?? No one bothers..
Does anyone know, 1984 victims have got justice several times in the form of several lacks of rupees, petrol pumps, housing plots/flats, etc.? But they will keep playing the minority card, as in this country, no one bothers about majority. In Punjab, still Hindus are killed and our religion is abused in Punjab till now by Sikhs and no one raise voice. Poor reporting !!
I disagree with the statement " the Army was sitting in the Barack and doing nothing" sorry dears I was in the Army that time,kindly note that Army carry out any thing only on ORDERS please dont blame Army saying doing nothing.
Re: Who is next?
by VIKAS SINGH on Dec 18, 2018 09:18 AM
By the way, why does Ashraf along with all his Modi-bashing colleagues refer to Modi as Narendra Damodardas Modi, and not as Narendra Modi or plain Modi?
Re: Who is next?
by Sandeep Singh on Dec 18, 2018 12:08 PM
You said it!! That means army should start talking strongly to ruling politicians if they deliberately make mistakes for vested political interests..
If 1984 victims were got justice by the time nobody were dare to do subsequence riots including Kashmiri Pandits. There were numbers of riots happened during congress regime including Bhagalpur & Ahmedabad (1969) among the worst. Justice started only 2002 riots from Gujarat & now 1984 after SIT by Modi. So rediff don't be partial & hide 1984 riots on the veil of 1992 & 2002
Re: Riots
by Gladyschellam on Dec 18, 2018 10:25 AM
There is no relevance to Link Mr Modi as if he was instrumental for this judgement.
Nov 1-4,1984 341 people killed and large properties were damaged. 24.10.2005: Investigation entrusted to CBI.
13.1.2010: CBI filed Charge Sheet
24.5.2010: Trial Court frames charges agst all the 6 accused. 30.4.2013: Trial Court acquitted Sajjan Singh 19.4.2013: CBI made an appeal with High Court Delhi agst Sajjan Kumar
17.12.2018: High court accorded judgement agst Sajjan Kumar.
Killing of Brahmins wouldnt qualify? by
Abhishek Thakur on Dec 17, 2018 09:08 PM | Hide replies | Hide message
After Mahatma Gandhi was killed, Congress organized killed, arsoning and looting of Brahmins in Maharashtra. But I guess that wouldnt count. The ethnic cleansing of Kashmiri pandits is also glossed over. I guess these are not supposed to be talked about.
I also have strong objection to the poster shown here that talks about "2008 violence against Christian". This only shows malicious intent on parts of these protesters. The 2008 violence was between 2 groups of tribals, one of which had converted to Christianity surreptitiously. It broke out after Swami Lakshmananand was brutally killed. But of course, killing of Swamis is perfectly acceptable and must not be talked about!
1984 first followed by 1992 and 2002 what about killing of Kashmiri Pandits ? Is the writer of this article not aware of it or intentionally ignored it ?
Re: Hindus skipped
by VIKAS SINGH on Dec 18, 2018 09:11 AM
Ashraf is not suffering from amnesia. He and his ilk believe that that Hindus are meant to be given the short shrift, so no tears be shed for them.
Re: Hindus skipped
by Sun on Dec 18, 2018 12:05 AM
How can you forget lacs of Hindus killed in Punjab before and after 1984 by Sikh terrorists and extremists?? No one bothers..
Does anyone know, 1984 victims have got justice several times in the form of several lacks of rupees, petrol pumps, housing plots/flats, etc.? But they will keep playing the minority card, as in this country, no one bothers about majority. In Punjab, still Hindus are killed and our religion is abused in Punjab till now by Sikhs and no one raise voice.
Re: 1984
by ASHOK UPADHYAYA on Dec 18, 2018 09:08 AM
True.... incidences of 1984 n 2002 are different... reasons are different, people are different etc....in 2002 had Hindus been killed more as witnessed in earlier riots... it would have been considered secularism...
Re: 1984
by ASHOK UPADHYAYA on Dec 18, 2018 09:32 AM
True.... incidences of 1984 n 2002 are different... reasons are different, people are different etc....in 2002 had Hindus been killed more as witnessed in earlier riots... it would have been considered secularism...
