Discussion Board

Why Kashmiris are agitating in favour of Art 35A


Total 50 messages Pages | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >
GOPINATHAN ANILKUMAR
Article 35A
by GOPINATHAN ANILKUMAR on Aug 25, 2018 07:39 AM

The objection to the scrapping off of Article 35A is against national interest. The Article 35A has been created without considering the constitution of India, without seeking the approval of the Parliament. Who created and for what purpose it was created; all these points should be brought before the people of India. Let us do it boldly. Otherwise we would be nurturing anti-national interests. Why "nurturing anti-national interests?" Let us go through history; then we will understand how it is nurturing anti-national interests.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
P S SHAH
Aritcle 35 A of indian constitution.
by P S SHAH on Aug 07, 2018 09:54 AM

As per article 35A, the Kashmiris only get permamnent status of residents of Kashmir and get right to own property in the state, jobs in public sector,scholarship, other welfare etc. the people other than Kashmiris enjoying status of permanent resident have no rights to do this. This is unfair to the people of others citizens of this country. The Kashmiris can buy properties in any part of the country but other than kashmiris can not buy any property in Kashmir. This is continued for last 70 years and now it is time to stop this nonsense and to give equal rights to every citizen of this country.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
claudius lazarus
Kashmiris have never had any idea why they protest?
by claudius lazarus on Aug 07, 2018 09:51 AM

The Kashmiris are a brainwashed lot, they protest for money. They have no idea about any article of the constitution. The Jihadists and the Hurriet had only one agenda to multiply exponentially and attain a great majority. Once that is attained they believe they can write a new constitution for themselves. All this inflamed and funded by pakistan. So the kashmiris have no idea what is happening they are just puppets in the hands of the jihadists and the hurriet.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Hare Pradhan
J&K Issue
by Hare Pradhan on Aug 07, 2018 09:48 AM

Abolition of article 370 and 35A will help restoring peace in the state. All states should have same rule,same provisions and same status. We all are Indians

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Suresh
Show love
by Suresh on Aug 06, 2018 08:32 PM

When any India can settle down in any state and buy immovable assets, why should Kashmir be any different. Only when everyone moves to kashmir and show them the love they are missing, they will understand the meaning of one-india.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
suravarapu gopal rao
Separate entity
by suravarapu gopal rao on Aug 06, 2018 08:10 PM  | Hide replies

Kashmir is a part of India. It need not be repeatedly told. Once someone felt that Kashmir should have special status. In the coming years, the so called residents restricted to Muslims whereas when the special entity given, there were people of all communities. Pakistanis are entering and disturbing the peace of India. The loyalty towards the country of those remaining there is changing. The so called separatists want their own version, which is not acceptable to India. If a handful of people live there with different mentality, action should be taken against them.
If those Kashmiris can roam the entire country, settle wherever they want, occupy posts in government and private organisations, why the remaining Indian people cannot enjoy the area of Kashmir. There is no reason for continuation of special benefits to be given at the cost of other States of the country. In the name of development, Kashmir is given lakhs of crores. Where is the development? Whose money is given for Kashmir development? It is the money of other States. Long years have passed. There should not be any delay. Kashmir should have benefits as any State and it should be accessible to the whole of Indians.
Get the POK be cleared of outsiders and brought into Indian domain..
Jai Hind. Jai Bharat.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Suresh
Re: Separate entity
by Suresh on Aug 06, 2018 08:35 PM
Also split Jammu and Kashmir to Jammu, Ladak, Kashmir Valley. So development funds can be channelled properly.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
suravarapu gopal rao
Separate entity
by suravarapu gopal rao on Aug 06, 2018 08:10 PM

Kashmir is a part of India. It need not be repeatedly told. Once someone felt that Kashmir should have special status. In the coming years, the so called residents restricted to Muslims whereas when the special entity given, there were people of all communities. Pakistanis are entering and disturbing the peace of India. The loyalty towards the country of those remaining there is changing. The so called separatists want their own version, which is not acceptable to India. If a handful of people live there with different mentality, action should be taken against them.
If those Kashmiris can roam the entire country, settle wherever they want, occupy posts in government and private organisations, why the remaining Indian people cannot enjoy the area of Kashmir. There is no reason for continuation of special benefits to be given at the cost of other States of the country. In the name of development, Kashmir is given lakhs of crores. Where is the development? Whose money is given for Kashmir development? It is the money of other States. Long years have passed. There should not be any delay. Kashmir should have benefits as any State and it should be accessible to the whole of Indians.
Get the POK be cleared of outsiders and brought into Indian domain..
Jai Hind. Jai Bharat.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 50 messages Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >
Write a message