Discussion Board

'Loya's death was natural': SC dismisses pleas seeking probe


Total 90 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3   Older >
piri
No surprises !
by piri on Apr 19, 2018 03:22 PM  | Hide replies

When a thief, who stole farmland meant for landless farmers with a false declaration about occupation and held on to that land till the Orissa govt cancelled the allocation, becomes the Chief Justice of India and when he abuses the court tradition of the master of the roster deciding benches to hear sensitive cases, one cant expect any better !

However, komaaaaali Modi, who is far and away the most corrupt PM India has ever had, now has begun to sense that all the blatantly false propaganda he has unleashed using his partys immense black money hoard may not quite continue to fool a large enough segment of the most gullible people on earth - North Indian commoners !

His constant braying at the top of his grating voice has had less and less impact even on these gullible simpletons !

    Forward  |  Report abuse
ashish tiwari
Re: No surprises !
by ashish tiwari on Apr 19, 2018 04:44 PM
Piri always makes me laugh..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
piri
Re: Re: No surprises !
by piri on Apr 19, 2018 05:30 PM

Hee...hee....mind if I join you ?

But.....on one condition !

You must tell me the reason why you laugh !

   Forward   |   Report abuse
P S SHAH
Re: Re: Re: No surprises !
by P S SHAH on Apr 19, 2018 10:35 PM
Abe kaliye, Have you ever given reasons why you point your ever dirty stinking fingers only at Modi and BJP and not against the party and ideology you blindly support ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
P S SHAH
Re: Re: No surprises !
by P S SHAH on Apr 19, 2018 10:33 PM
What about his dirtiest stink coming out of his kaaaaali never washed or cleaned .................?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message awaiting moderator review
deepak  kumar
Re: No surprises !
by deepak kumar on Apr 19, 2018 05:40 PM
An apex institution is being converted into a broker run organisation. Now it is upto your capability to get a favourable decision. Fact and evidences....my foot.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
P S SHAH
Re: No surprises !
by P S SHAH on Apr 19, 2018 10:32 PM
AbeKaliye, the ever stinking dirty komaaaaaaaaaaaaaaali, just repeat your comments on CJI alltge time without having guts to write directly to CJI accusing him of his frauds. Every one at Rediff know you as real komaaaaaali. And you will die as komaaaaaaaaaaaaaaali only with your constant chanting about North Indians.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Voice of people
Et tu brute
by Voice of people on Apr 19, 2018 03:18 PM

Nothing will be happen, Its India, here there is no law and order, no justice.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
deepak  kumar
Honesty and Indian Judicial System
by deepak kumar on Apr 19, 2018 03:07 PM

It is a well known fact how honest our judicial system is. Just do an asset/property audit of all the judges, current as well as retired and then you will know what percentage of them has been honest in discharging their duties. It is one of the most corrupt institution in India. But the best part is they have immunity from prosecution.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Vijay Sahani
13 questions
by Vijay Sahani on Apr 19, 2018 03:07 PM  | Hide replies

1. Why was Judge JT Utpat, Judge Loya’s predecessor in hearing the case, transferred from hearing the case despite a 2012 Supreme Court order specifying that the same judge should hear the matter from start to finish?

2. Were Bombay High Court Chief Justice Mohit Shah or the principal accused Amit Shah aware of any alleged inducements offered to Judge Loya to ensure a favourable judgment in the case?

. Does Justice Mohit Shah deny the allegation by Judge Loya’s sister Anuradha Biyani, that he himself made an offer of Rs 100 crore in return for a favourable judgment?

4. Who made the arrangements for Judge Loya’s transportation to Dande Hospital on the night of his death, and why was this not in a vehicle from the government guest house or an ambulance?

5. Do Dande Hospital and/or Meditrina Hospital have records indicating what medication was provided to Judge Loya while in their care, and who was with him at the time?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Vijay Sahani
Re: 13 questions
by Vijay Sahani on Apr 19, 2018 03:11 PM
6. What was the time of Judge Loya’s death according to the records of Meditrina Hospital and when do call records show this was intimated to Judge Loya’s family? Did the death occur at 6:15 am or before 5 am on 1 December 2014, or did it in fact occur before midnight?

7. In what circumstances can a person die of “coronary artery insufficiency”? Is it possible for a person in good physical health without any cardiac history or other markers of this condition, experience “coronary artery insufficiency” and lose their life?

8. Why was a post-mortem report ordered into Judge Loya’s death when no panchnama or FIR was filed terming it a suspicious death, and why was Judge Loya’s family not informed about the performance of a post-mortem? Alternatively, were any reasons for performance of post-mortem report recorded, where were these recorded and who recorded them?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vijay Sahani
Re: 13 questions
by Vijay Sahani on Apr 19, 2018 03:13 PM
9. Who signed the post-mortem report pages as “maiyatacha chulatbhau” (ie paternal cousin brother of the deceased) when no relation of Judge Loya was present in Nagpur? Does the countersignatory, the senior police inspector of Sadar police station, recollect who this was?

10. What was Ishwar Baheti’s relationship with the deceased and on what basis was he coordinating the funeral arrangements for Judge Loya, including contacting the family? Why was Judge Loya’s phone returned to the family by Mr Baheti rather than the police? Alternatively, did the police ask Mr Baheti to return the phone to Judge Loya’s family?

11. Does Judge Loya’s family still have the allegedly bloodstained shirt worn by Judge Loya at the time of death which the post-mortem report claims was dry?

12. Is it true that the CBI was only given 15 minutes to argue against the discharge of Amit Shah in subsequent hearings of the case before Judge Loya’s successor in hearing the case, Judge Gosavi, as against three days for the defence lawyers?

13. Has the Hon'ble SC answered these nagging questions which the appellants had asked?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
piri
Re: Re: 13 questions
by piri on Apr 19, 2018 04:29 PM
Perhaps it is to leave such questions un-addressed that the CJI has laboured so hard (even proving in the bargain that he is just another big time thief) to keep the 4 *difficult* judges of the collegium out of the benches to hear cases such as this one !

   Forward   |   Report abuse
ashish tiwari
Re: Re: Re: 13 questions
by ashish tiwari on Apr 19, 2018 04:46 PM
Why these two known deranged lunatics are allowed to vomit on this forum?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
piri
Re: Re: Re: Re: 13 questions
by piri on Apr 19, 2018 05:55 PM

The stink is not that of vomit, it is that of excreta !

Perhaps it is coming from your unwashed bottom !

You are from North India, aren't you ? This must be very familiar !

   Forward   |   Report abuse
P S SHAH
Re: Re: Re: 13 questions
by P S SHAH on Apr 19, 2018 10:44 PM
Oye Ever stinking Kaliye, do you know anything about law ? Have you read the full judgement before continuing your usual non stop nonsense ? The malaise intention of four judges to control judiciary is fully exposed before the county and their leader Justice Chelameshwar will be first to get out from Apex Court in June, 2018.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
piri
Re: Re: Re: Re: 13 questions
by piri on Apr 20, 2018 12:53 AM

Hey wayside defeacator dumbo, stop pretending that you know something about law !!

What is a malaise intention ?

Malaise intention ??

Whatever is that ??

Did you mean........... MALAFIDE INTENTION ?

And you say MALAISE INTENTION ???

You are so ignorant that you do not even know you are making a mighty fool of yourself !!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
P S SHAH
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 13 questions
by P S SHAH on Apr 20, 2018 09:38 AM
Oye kaliye, ever stinking dirty komaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaali,every one at rediff know that you are the biggest idiot who has no activity except writing nonsense and to post repeated copy pastes free of cost.

Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Rajnath Guru
Re: 13 questions
by Rajnath Guru on Apr 19, 2018 05:01 PM
Mr .. U are taking notes from Takles article as if you have something new...Deception to hoodwink the forum.. But do not forget all that days of decption and tom foolery by your likes is over ... Your breed stands exposed but shameless that you are to the core will castigate everyone ...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
piri
Re: Re: 13 questions
by piri on Apr 19, 2018 05:32 PM

Hey, dumbo, stop trying to pretend that you can understand any of the arguments and logic !

It is reserved for those with common sense !

   Forward   |   Report abuse
P S SHAH
Re: Re: Re: 13 questions
by P S SHAH on Apr 19, 2018 10:45 PM
Oye Ever stinking Kaliye, do you have any common sense ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
piri
Re: Re: Re: Re: 13 questions
by piri on Apr 20, 2018 12:56 AM

Much more than you, you dumbo !

What common sense do you have ?

You are so much of a nitwit that you make a big fool of yourself each day on this board with your ignorance about law, about jurisprudence, about legal jargon...about everything with your impossibly broken English !!

A dumbo pretending to know something about law but is ignorant about basic legal terms !!

Off with you, you dunce !

   Forward   |   Report abuse
P S SHAH
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 13 questions
by P S SHAH on Apr 20, 2018 09:42 AM
Oye kaliye, the ever stinking dirty komaaaaaaaaaaaali Buffoon, you have absolutely no knowledge about law.You write better English or exposing yourself how ignorant you are about law. You Ch...a ,depressed, frustrated, confused, jealous man can not achieve anything in your life and will remain jobless and useless throughout your life.

Forward   |   Report abuse
Rajnath Guru
Re: 13 questions
by Rajnath Guru on Apr 19, 2018 05:02 PM
Mr .. U are taking notes from Takles article as if you have something new...Deception to hoodwink the forum.. But do not forget all that days of decption and tom foolery by your likes is over ... Your breed stands exposed but shameless that you are to the core will castigate everyone ...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
P S SHAH
Re: 13 questions
by P S SHAH on Apr 19, 2018 10:40 PM
As per the law, the onus to prove allegation is on the petitioner .They have miserably failed to prove any of their allegations. The verdict of three member bench has not kept any scope for any one to challenge their judgement.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
P S SHAH
Re: Re: 13 questions
by P S SHAH on Apr 19, 2018 10:48 PM
The people with inadequate knowledge maywrite hundreds of points but it is of no use as the Apex Court has finally closed the case relating to the death of Justice Loya.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vijay Sahani
Something amiss
by Vijay Sahani on Apr 19, 2018 03:03 PM  | Hide replies

It's strange that a leading forensic expert Dr RK Sharma—the former head of the Forensic Medicine and Toxicology Department at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences in Delhi, and the president of the Indian Association of Medico-Legal Experts for 22 years—has dismissed the official claim that Loya died of a heart attack

BUT

The Supreme court thinks that eyewitness evidence of judges is more important than forensic evidence.

This is against jurisprudence which puts forensic evidence, especially if the post mortem report (issued by a government medical hospital) raises suspicion.

There is something amiss (and i'm being extremely polite here).

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Vijay Sahani
Re: Something amiss
by Vijay Sahani on Apr 19, 2018 04:33 PM
This is against jurisprudence which puts forensic evidence above eyewitness's statements, especially if the post mortem report (issued by a government medical hospital) raises suspicion.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vijay Sahani
Re: Something amiss
by Vijay Sahani on Apr 19, 2018 04:41 PM
Eyewitness statements by a judge have no more value in law than that of ordinary citizens BUT "Hon'ble" SC teems to think that a statement by a judge should be considered as Gospel truth.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Rohtas jain
Natural Death of Justice Loya
by Rohtas jain on Apr 19, 2018 02:16 PM

How can SC decide that the justice Loya's death is natural within minutes. whereas they take years to conclude for an open case. Strange ???

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Rohtas jain
Natural Death of Justice Loya
by Rohtas jain on Apr 19, 2018 02:16 PM

How can SC decide that the justice Loya's death is natural within minutes. whereas they take years to conclude for an open case. Strange ???

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Suresh Babu
Justice Loya's death
by Suresh Babu on Apr 19, 2018 02:04 PM  | Hide replies

Loya's death is unnatural because of fake encounter master Amit Shah's very much involvement in this case. So a thorough enquiry into the death is necessary.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
ashwani sharma
Re: Justice Loya's death
by ashwani sharma on Apr 19, 2018 02:48 PM
Babu Ji
Your P Chidamaram , Sushil Shinde, Shivraj Patil, Former PM Manmohan Singh,UPS Boss Sonia Ji, Depty Boss Rahul Gandhi had all the time in the world to bring Amit Shah to justice! Why could they not do that?
Do we assume that as the cases were forged ,hence could not be proved!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
gokula patra
Re: Justice Loya's death
by gokula patra on Apr 19, 2018 02:50 PM
Sorabuddin was a saint and a nationalist of highest order like his masters in khangress.. So converts are all now in pain to loose one of their kin...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
ashwani sharma
The Buck Stops Here!
by ashwani sharma on Apr 19, 2018 01:41 PM

Hope with SC verdict settles the matter to complete rest. We pray peace to the departed soul of Justice Loya. Request all not to use Judiciary as a tool settle to settle the political battles. Hope the entire spectrum of politicians, Judiciary ,Executive understands this very clearly.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 90 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3   Older >
Write a message