The critics of MODI and BJP,are interested to inculcate that Godhra riots to tarnish BJP and MODI.But why are these fools in the garb of politicians and officials say about the incident which lead to godhra riots.More than 200 karsevaks were britally killed in a train compartment,with spraying petrol on them and locking the compartment and putting fire in to it.Was it not a dastardly act?General DYER of british india is infamous for his wagon tragedy and this wagon arsoning in independant india did not seem to be a dreaded act to these fools.There will be retaliation and it is natural,even if riots and violence is condemnable.I am not supporting godhra riots,but all are to be seen with a non partisan view.In kashmir more than 3 lacs hindus were driven out and their assets were occupied by others ,but nothing was done;even after hindu protectors that BJP came to power.But when 50000 rohingyas were driven out of myanmar,as myanmar government says that these were extremists,these so called human rights activists fight for them.We are not to give asylum to rohingyas,as many of their fold are Pak ISI ans ISIS supporters and will become trouble mongers to our country.
As Election is in December in Gujarat, all those anti Gujarat and anti BJP are coming up one by one with CD, paper and all faltu stuff.Here silliest question is "In case the BJP does not secure enough seats to form a government, and the Congress along with other regional outfits are in a position to cobble a working majority, will you join such a coalition?" ......can he get 1000 vote in any of constituency of his choice???
As Election is in December in Gujarat, all those anti Gujarat and anti BJP are coming up one by one with CD, paper and all faltu stuff.Here silliest question is "In case the BJP does not secure enough seats to form a government, and the Congress along with other regional outfits are in a position to cobble a working majority, will you join such a coalition?" ......can he get 1000 vote in any of constituency of his choice???
Re: Riots
by P S SHAH on Sep 20, 2017 06:18 PM
There is big difference between 2002 and 1984. In 2002, nearly 300 people died in police firing. The state government gave full cooperation to the investigation and courts and helped them to convict number of culprits. The case were decided by the fast track courts and some cases outside Gujarat. In 1984, there was absolutely no law and order for three days in the capital of the country. Not a single bullet was fired by the police who were mute witness to the crime. Even after 32 years, the families of victims are waiting for a real justice while the main culprits are roaming free. CM Modi had never given any irresponsible statement like ex PM Rajiv Gandhi justify the violence in 1984
In April, the court had allowed her to include Shah, the second most powerful man in the BJP and Rajya Sabha MP as defence witness. Thrice now she has filed applications seeking further time to serve summons to Shah to testify in the case claiming that she had been unable to get the address on which to do so as Shah was busy and on the move. On Tuesday, the special court hearing the case issued summons to Shah to depose as a defence witness on September 18. Kodnani’s inability to reach Shah has bared the helplessness and her complete isolation by the BJP.NOW THE great Second in Command and right hand man of PM Narendra Modi says that Dr. Kodnani was not present in in Naroda Dam on the fateful day in the YEAR 2002 - Babri Masjid riot case. What is happening in BJP India. Amit Shah was untraceable for summoning as a witness for Kodnani. Suddenly he deposes that Mrs. Kodnani was in the Assembly on the day of massacre of 2002. Amit Shah may be the BJP National President and the right hand man of PM Modi. He is powerful enough to manipulate evidences, manufacture new theories. Kodnani has already served number of years in prison and she could not assert or disclose that she was in Assembly on the fateful day. It will be a traversity of justice if Shah-Modi succeeds in heir manipulations.
Re: Gujerat Riots
by biren maur on Sep 20, 2017 05:12 PM
You got a point Mr. Bhaskaran... Hope its not drowned in the DIN by psedisecularists & their blind followers
In April, the court had allowed her to include Shah, the second most powerful man in the BJP and Rajya Sabha MP as defence witness. Thrice now she has filed applications seeking further time to serve summons to Shah to testify in the case claiming that she had been unable to get the address on which to do so as Shah was busy and on the move. On Tuesday, the special court hearing the case issued summons to Shah to depose as a defence witness on September 18. Kodnani’s inability to reach Shah has bared the helplessness and her complete isolation by the BJP.NOW THE great Second in Command and right hand man of PM Narendra Modi says that Dr. Kodnani was not present in in Naroda Dam on the fateful day in the YEAR 2002 - Babri Masjid riot case. What is happening in BJP India. Amit Shah was untraceable for summoning as a witness for Kodnani. Suddenly he deposes that Mrs. Kodnani was in the Assembly on the day of massacre of 2002. Amit Shah may be the BJP National President and the right hand man of PM Modi. He is powerful enough to manipulate evidences, manufacture new theories. Kodnani has already served number of years in prison and she could not assert or disclose that she was in Assembly on the fateful day. It will be a traversity of justice if Shah-Modi succeeds in heir manipulations.
Re: Gujerat Riots
by P S SHAH on Sep 20, 2017 01:00 PM
K Bhaskaran. Why don't you also write such a long comments about what happened in 1984 Delhi riots ?
Re: Re: Gujerat Riots
by K Bhaskaran on Sep 21, 2017 11:11 AM
It is a sad story - the Delhi Riots case. It is better that the causes and consequences are not boiled up for yet a repetition of riots.
Re: Gujerat Riots
by P S SHAH on Sep 20, 2017 01:01 PM
K Bhaskaran. Why don't you also write such a long comments about what happened in 1984 Delhi riots ?
Re: Gujerat Riots
by P S SHAH on Sep 20, 2017 01:01 PM
K Bhaskaran. Why don\'t you also write such a long comments about what happened in 1984 Delhi riots ?
In April, the court had allowed her to include Shah, the second most powerful man in the BJP and Rajya Sabha MP as defence witness. Thrice now she has filed applications seeking further time to serve summons to Shah to testify in the case claiming that she had been unable to get the address on which to do so as Shah was busy and on the move. On Tuesday, the special court hearing the case issued summons to Shah to depose as a defence witness on September 18. Kodnani’s inability to reach Shah has bared the helplessness and her complete isolation by the BJP.NOW THE great Second in Command and right hand man of PM Narendra Modi says that Dr. Kodnani was not present in in Naroda Dam on the fateful day in the YEAR 2002 - Babri Masjid riot case. What is happening in BJP India. Amit Shah was untraceable for summoning as a witness for Kodnani. Suddenly he deposes that Mrs. Kodnani was in the Assembly on the day of massacre of 2002. Amit Shah may be the BJP National President and the right hand man of PM Modi. He is powerful enough to manipulate evidences, manufacture new theories. Kodnani has already served number of years in prison and she could not assert or disclose that she was in Assembly on the fateful day. It will be a traversity of justice if Shah-Modi succeeds in heir manipulations.
The case of Gujrat Riots is far from complete Modi and Amit can not escape the final judjment of responsibility. As management of Ryan International School of Gurgaon is not spare with one death of student how Modi and Amit are free with 2000 killing in the state
Re: Gujrat Riots
by Lalukumar Choubey on Sep 20, 2017 03:14 PM
a crow in disguise of a peacock shall always remain a blacky crow. A crow may have any western name like Flora, Francis, Christofer, Daniel, william, John, Michael, Peter, Joseph, Judas et c. but will never be able to change the color of the skin. Will never be able to rub off the past lineage. A crow, born as a crow, shall also die as a crow. Meantime, may manage to get free rice bag, ration, meal every week and nothing more than that. A renegade, a turncoat, a proselytizer will never get salvation.
Re: Gujrat Riots
by Lalukumar Choubey on Sep 20, 2017 03:14 PM
a crow in disguise of a peacock shall always remain a blacky crow. A crow may have any western name like Flora, Francis, Christofer, Daniel, william, John, Michael, Peter, Joseph, Judas et c. but will never be able to change the color of the skin. Will never be able to rub off the past lineage. A crow, born as a crow, shall also die as a crow. Meantime, may manage to get free rice bag, ration, meal every week and nothing more than that. A renegade, a turncoat, a proselytizer will never get salvation.
Re: Gujrat Riots
by SUDHIR SINGHAL on Sep 20, 2017 04:39 PM
Surendra Flora, you are a moron to question the deliberated findings of the Highest Court of the Land. And Prasanna De Zora is a bought and paid stooge of Rediff and the Congress.
Re: Gujrat Riots
by P S SHAH on Sep 20, 2017 06:22 PM
Surendra flora, Congress tried their best to nail both Modi and Amit Shah by misusing power and government machineries but failed miserably in their mission in absence of any evidence showing their involvement. Why you bias and colour blind person conveniently forget the worst ever massacre of 1984 and the people responsible for it ?
Re: Gujrat Riots
by rajesh rameshwar sharma on Sep 20, 2017 11:28 AM
What a great comparison!!! Modi has become PM partly on his successful CM tenure & partly on account of Gujrat riot. I salute congress & officer like Sharma without whom Modi could not become PM.Keep continue on Gujrat riot & we see Modi will complete second tenure as PM
Re: Re: Gujrat Riots
by P S SHAH on Sep 20, 2017 06:27 PM
Mr Sharma, Congress never like Modi to continue as CM as under his presence, Congress has absolutely no chance to come to power in Gujarat again. They tried their best to nail Modi for 2002 riots but failed miserably in their mission in absence of any evidence which can prove Modi's involvement in 2002 riots.
