Discussion Board

Deplore India's current measures to deport Rohingyas: UN human rights chief


Total 25 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3   Older >
R  ponnabalam
U.N. should not talk interfere on Indian law and order&lo pro
by R ponnabalam on Sep 16, 2017 03:20 PM

Speaking at the opening of a Human Rights Council session in Geneva, Zeid also referred to the killing of activist-journalist Gauri Lankesh, observing that she "tirelessly addressed the corrosive effect of sectarianism and hatred." What she addressed or did.?It must be substantiated authenticated .These are Indian political affairs. U.N has no business to talk on indian Politics There are many societal fault lines in India .In this case mentioned nothing is Indian Public domain yet beyond what had been published.Sectarianism and hatred is going on India from 1880s;Articles on What Sir Syed khan had said in 1880 would throw light on Sectarianism and hatred R.PONNAMBALAM

    Forward  |  Report abuse
R  ponnabalam
Advise Bangla desh
by R ponnabalam on Sep 16, 2017 03:10 PM

"I deplore -- in India to deport Rohingyas at a time of such violence against them in their country," Zeid said.These people hadn't got citizenship from 1948 .What had U.N. Human Rights commission done on that that for this long." violence in Myanmar began in August when Rohingya militants attacked police posts in Rakhine, killing 12 security personnel."Why the Myanmar Govt . is told by U.N that they have to keep quiet when their security personnel are killed and why don't U.N H.R commission pontificate on that to Myanmar.E.Pakistan(now called Bangladesh) was for Bengali speaking Muslims.Why on earth reports say Bangladesh Govt doesn't accept them." by virtue of customary law" Is there a customary law designed provision to permit U.N.H.R. commission to be ineffective from 1948? "India cannot carry out collective expulsions, or return people to a place where they risk torture or other serious violations." These are potential Security threats to India;these can be drawn into Globalcommunityism Religion slogan by Pakistan and can be used by Pakistan against India.U.N couldn't vacate Pakistan's aggression on India yet ; keeps listening to Pakistan which like a man who in 1959 didn't marry a girl of 22yrs but wants to marry a girl of 22years in 2017 because his father had decreed and told so to him,comes to U.N without ever vacating it's aggression Kashmir ,Kashmir.U.N. doesn't has it to throw out this time wasting practices.R.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
R ponnabalam
If you couldn't convince Myanmar you had got convinced by Myanmar
by R ponnabalam on Sep 11, 2017 09:47 PM

Respected UN human rights chief This is not a problem a day or two.For so many years that it has been going on don't you accept that you had failed to convince Myanmar that these people are Maynmarish , thereby by getting youself convinced that they are not Myanmarish. Then with that it should have possible for you to convince Bangladesh, the other party.If you had failed there too.declare a FALIURE BOARD,Raise your hands and advise not to INDIA R.PONNAMBALAM

    Forward  |  Report abuse
R ponnabalam
Talk to Both the concerned Country.If you cannot better be sile
by R ponnabalam on Sep 11, 2017 09:38 PM

This Myanmar Refugee problem has been lingering for long What the international organizations have done for years on this..Why these couldn't prove to the lady-chiefs who is at fault & why they teach India.It is their job to convince the concerned parties to the case.They should not lecture at India, an outsider to this problem.R.Ponnambalam

    Forward  |  Report abuse
R ponnabalam
Your duty to convince myanmar or bangladesh
by R ponnabalam on Sep 11, 2017 09:32 PM

Charity begins at home.They are part of a global communityism.So sir you should accomodate them in your country when you cannot prove to Myanamar that they are myanmarish or to bangladesh that bangladeshi's If you fail in that India is not responsible for your failure to do that.R.PONNAMBALAM

    Forward  |  Report abuse
cabe walker
Fo
by cabe walker on Sep 11, 2017 08:44 PM  | Hide replies

The jordanian..prince Zeid..should preach to his own country and his neighbors..Saudi etc. He has habit of over steppin his boundaries time and again. He had problems from russians to filipinos..US etc etc..but never with Middle east rulers..now he is on Indias case..he can just £c⬠0££

    Forward  |  Report abuse
R ponnabalam
Re: Fo
by R ponnabalam on Sep 11, 2017 09:28 PM
Which Muslim Country had supported India against Pakistan's attempts in Kashmir to dismember India and India's islamization. Has he seen to it that all Bangladeshi's who came during 1971 have returned. Why can't he ask Myammar and prove to them that they are wrong.If he is failing to convince myanmar or bangladesh to take them should India take them?If so he can and should accomodate them in his country. Charity begins at home R.POnnambalam

   Forward   |   Report abuse
R  ponnabalam
Re: Fo
by R ponnabalam on Sep 16, 2017 07:38 PM
Ask him to read the knighted man of 1880s. Sir Syed Khan This UNHC would know what is sectarianism and what is hatred from that R.Ponnambalam

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 25 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3   Older >
Write a message