He is a reasonable person if he lets the professional work to his discretion. A professional photographer knows better what would be the ideal light and shed and the person being photographed should oblige. But a question can be asked whether the Prime Minister Mr. Morarji Desai hired him to be photographed or was the photographer doing it to serve his employer.
Why giving importance to such photographers, Modi is our PM, He is taking country in right direction, Such Photographers should be bycotted, To gain popularity this type of man can dump themselves to any extent, shame on you photographer
Re: Foolish Posts by Rediff
by Prakash Paithankar on Sep 02, 2017 05:06 PM
ENGINEER Saheb, The PM is late Morarji Desai whom the photographer did not shoot. Pl. read full article before commenting.
Which of the following points you found objectionable? (1) Paul's very first photos were judged superb. (2) Paul outdistanced all his rivals in his first interview. (3) The info is from an article which rediff itself quoted. One abusive contributor repeatedly threatened to "fu*k" my wife and you published his rants despite my reporting abuse. What are your acceptance norms, Moderator?
Once again the 'anti modi' article in 'Business Standard' published by Rediff. I feel the Photographer becomes famous by not taking photo of Modi, otherwise no body knows hime except few intellectutal
Re: Anti modi
by Anup Halarnkar on Sep 01, 2017 01:48 PM
The prime minister in the article is Morarji Desai and not Mr. Modi. Please read before commenting
