why u move america.forgetting both modi & u.trump forgetting.but i m not forgetting this.mind it.u not love america,donot care america.then why move america.tell me answer.first!
Re: stop mouth,what telling in past. i donot care america.
by Against Pseudos on Oct 31, 2017 04:26 AM
BARIK you. Getting upper. Lower deck. Why blacking? In the park. Birds birding but you not enough. Absolute mind. :-)
Re: Re: stop mouth,what telling in past. i donot care america.
by pk kh on Oct 31, 2017 09:45 AM
His patent sentence I am ordering you....no vote modi trump rss...
rightly point you have raised. it is our culture . all MP ;MLA, municipal ward leader; political worker behave like king and there devotee. recently indident in maharastra by MNS worker is example. there people can beat the public but when public beat there people they are arrested. this is law which we inherited from british. and no change in it.
AkarPatel Given the state of India Pakistan relations,It would take months to process a visa. It is therefore a humanitarian gesture on the part of the foreign minister to intercede and speed up the process. if you are not aware of this basic fact, you don't deserve write such a motivated article with extraneous analogy.Editors should watch out and curb such meterial
AkarPatel Given the state of India Pakistan relations,It would take months to process a visa. It is therefore a humanitarian gesture on the part of the foreign minister to intercede and speed up the process. if you are not aware of this basic fact, you don't deserve write such a motivated article with extraneous analogy.Editors should watch out and curb such meterial
Mrs Swaraj's speech at the UN was delivered in her own style but was Modi-fied to please the PM. Her part of Pakistan policy is to win over the hearts and minds of the women and children troubled by the backward men !
There is little doubt that someone of Mrs Swaraj's age will also have a matronly disposition to the rest of the world and probably was expected by the PMO. Other matters are too serious for someone who has no physical stamina.
The same applies to Mr Jaitley. His highly irritable countenance and pedantic discourse is a shield against any hard questions. He merely holds a durbar conveying the mind and decisions of the PMO - quite apparent.
The ministers fall over each other to compete and impress. That the whole cabinet trooped to the Election Commission just to thwart the election of a Congress loyalist who didn't defect, speaks of just one thing - use any and all ways and means to please the high command. How are they different from the servile and sycophantic Congressmen grovelling at the feet of their high command?
I guess you are wrong in this matter Mr. Aakar Patel, not only Mrs. Sushma Swaraj all other ministers in central govt. pay attention to every matter, railway ministry, pertolium ministry, or any other ministry they all pay attention and solve issue, they are approachable and sincere in their work.
Re: They have process. We have durbars
by P S SHAH on Oct 30, 2017 11:25 AM
Mr Srivastav, This Akaar Patel is India head of Amnesty International and is a known Modi hater. He is known for writing nonsense most of the time and the people should not give any undue importance to such useless and bias person.
Re: They have process. We have durbars
by sowmya shetty on Oct 30, 2017 11:53 AM
Question is not about wether they are approachable or not, question is why should a person find it necessary to have to contact the ministers.. while it is appreciatable that the ministers are reachable, at the same time there should have been drastic changes in the functioning of our embassies by now.
Re: Re: They have process. We have durbars
by Against Pseudos on Oct 30, 2017 02:22 PM
Shetty: By the same logic there should have been drastic change in Aakar and you by now.
I guess you are wrong in this matter Mr. Aakar Patel, not only Mrs. Sushma Swaraj all other ministers in central govt. pay attention to every matter, railway ministry, pertolium ministry, or any other ministry they all pay attention and solve issue, they are approachable and sincere in their work.
Well, systemic improvements are always necessary and is the main course of duty of officers in Foreign Ministry departments. However intervention by a foreign minister in exceptional cases is a sign of liveliness in the policy which was missing since many years. We cannot raise our eyebrows for these. Milind Joshi
