Discussion Board

Som's right: Foreigners built the Taj


Total 127 messages Pages | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Soumitra Goswami
Painful history
by Soumitra Goswami on Oct 27, 2017 03:32 PM

The soothe hearers often forget that keeping painful history alive gives big learning for generation to come. India's colonisation happened because of divisive states within. These monuments remind that the history should not repeat. That only can happen by not altering history.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Sayed Raja
great monuments built by moghuls in india
by Sayed Raja on Oct 26, 2017 10:22 PM  | Hide replies

moghul rule of 800 years in india and after that british rule of 90 yrs was the golden era of indian history of 2000 yrs.the achievement of this era in architecture,monuments ,aviation,rly,telephone,medical science,univercities are making indians educated otehrwise they would have been living in jugles even now.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
grahana
Re: great monuments built by moghuls in india
by grahana on Oct 27, 2017 04:36 PM
that's why your people are begging for perks and other allowances from the tax payer's money

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Ramesh
Please
by Ramesh on Oct 22, 2017 08:46 PM

Please give me the name of the main Contractor who was awarded this contract. Next month I will try to meet him

    Forward  |  Report abuse
sarjit saharan
The Taj mahal
by sarjit saharan on Oct 20, 2017 08:27 AM  | Hide replies

The Taj Mahal was build by the indian labours with the Indian money. By its destruction Aam Aadmi and the nation would achieve nothing. it will be gain to contractors and politician like construction of highways & govt not repairing the existing roads net work . Aam Aadmi will receive dust pollution.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
paul theo
Re: The Taj mahal
by paul theo on Oct 22, 2017 02:34 PM
MOST OF THE GOVT BUILDINGS EXISTING TODAY INCLUDING COURTS , PARLIAMENT HOUSE WERE BUILT BY THE BRITISH.
THEY STAND AGELESS , WITH EXCELLENT ARCHITECTURE, SO ARE THEY TO BE DEMOLISHED BECAUSE THE BRITISH BUILT THEM? ONLY FOOLS WILL TALK LIKE THAT, BUT WE HAVE ELECTED SOME FOOLS, UNFORTUNATELY

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Satyanarayan Moharana
Dipawali in Ayodhya
by Satyanarayan Moharana on Oct 19, 2017 01:52 PM

Congratulations to CM Yogi for organising Dipawali Festival at Ayodhya which worldwide people watched. People now could know that somebody named Raam physically existed in Ayodhya for whom Dipawali is being observed since thousand of years by Indians.

However, we do not find Raam in our Indian Text Books. This is very bad. Now it should have been done atleast.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
MISSIONARY
British rule was golden era in Indian History!
by MISSIONARY on Oct 19, 2017 01:47 PM  | Hide replies

British rule was golden era in Indian History!

1. British unified over 550 princely states into a single entity.
2. They ended Moslem domination in India and liberated Hinddus from 1000-year long subjugation that eventually led to the rise of Hinddu intellectual class who could eventually fight for the freedom of India.
3. British rule prevented India from becoming a BarbaricIslamicState by ending forced conversions to Izzlam.
4. British built excellent dams, bridges, railways, roads, etc which unheard in the rest of Asia (during 19th century).
5. British opened many universities and colleges in India, which helped Hinddus to rise as an intellectual class.
6. British introduced English helped India to become a software superpower in the world today.
7. British rule considerably weakened the barbaric caste-system, even though remnants of the system remain. Even superstitions decreased to a great extent.
8. Due to better medical services, death rate dropped and life-span increased.
9. Railways, postal services, modern education, English medicine, etc rapidly improved the standards and quality of life.
10. It is a myth spread by deceivers that Indian economy was 27% of world economy is 1700. India was much poorer at that time.
11. HHindus were living under complete subjugation of Mozlems. British rule gave great religious freedom to HHindus
12. British rule altogether gave a new direction to Indians who were mired in ignorance, superstitions, caste-barbarity.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
MISSIONARY
Re: British rule was golden era in Indian History!
by MISSIONARY on Oct 19, 2017 01:48 PM
13. British Neutralized Mozlem Rulers in India and restored religious freedom, though many do not want to agree.

14. Even in 1857-58 mutiny, British killed mostly mozlems (nearly 1 million) and only 200,000 HHindus were killed.

15. British built railways to efficiently transport goods to ports in India, but they also allowed Indian public to travel in trains, though not in the whites-only compartments.

16. British built several colleges and universities. It is incorrect to state that British education was set only raise 3-level clerks to serve the British. There were many high-ranked Indian officers in the British administration.


17. They gave an equitable Justice system (even though a minority British citizens, less than 1%, living India enjoyed special status).

18. Indians never had the habit of writing. All the history we read is based on myths, fictions, and fantasies.

19. Shashi Taroor is half-educated and half-ignorant.


20. I accept though HHinduism develops porous and idiotic mentality, HHinduism is far better than Izzzlam which develops brutal and crude mentality under the garb monotheist extreemism.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Satyanarayan Moharana
Re: Re: British rule was golden era in Indian History!
by Satyanarayan Moharana on Oct 19, 2017 02:07 PM
Reply to Sl.18: I agree with it fully. British got the opportunity of mythologocal trend books like Purans, Bhagawat,etc prevalent in India and included Raam and Krishna's life perios in them instead of in History at all.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Pen diamond
Re: British rule was golden era in Indian History!
by Pen diamond on Oct 23, 2017 03:35 PM
1. British did not unify the princely states, it was not their intention, they wanted to loot India
2. British did not intend to liberate the Hinddus, They wanted to loot India
3. British did not intend to prevent India from becoming a Islamic state, their intention was looting India
4. British did not build anything. It was our engineers and our money with our workforce who built it. They wanted to maximise the looting that is all
5. British did not open a single University in india. The IIT was opened after the Indian independence
6. British introduction of English has led to the loss of local languages. There are countries in the world who are pretty much not English but in their local language have established a developed society
7. British system divided lay the seeds of hatred in the caste system ; India was harmonious with caste before their advent
8. The death of Ayurveda is directly linked to the British subjugation of this fantastic science
9. Modern education is good in creating coolies which the English wanted
10 It is a truth that Indian economy was 27% of world economy that is exactly why the British came to India for
11. Hinddus were not completely living under muslim rule. There were considerable amount of non mozlem ruler in India
12. British successfully created a inferiority complex in the minds of the people that their ancient culture was but ignorance, superstitious, and barbaric where as it was the other way round
13. It was not the intention of the Brit

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Pen diamond
Re: British rule was golden era in Indian History!
by Pen diamond on Oct 23, 2017 03:36 PM
Z1. British did not unify the princely states, it was not their intention, they wanted to loot India
2. British did not intend to liberate the Hinddus, They wanted to loot India
3. British did not intend to prevent India from becoming a Islamic state, their intention was looting India
4. British did not build anything. It was our engineers and our money with our workforce who built it. They wanted to maximise the looting that is all
5. British did not open a single University in india. The IIT was opened after the Indian independence
6. British introduction of English has led to the loss of local languages. There are countries in the world who are pretty much not English but in their local language have established a developed society
7. British system divided lay the seeds of hatred in the caste system ; India was harmonious with caste before their advent
8. The death of Ayurveda is directly linked to the British subjugation of this fantastic science
9. Modern education is good in creating coolies which the English wanted
10 It is a truth that Indian economy was 27% of world economy that is exactly why the British came to India for
11. Hinddus were not completely living under muslim rule. There were considerable amount of non mozlem ruler in India
12. British successfully created a inferiority complex in the minds of the people that their ancient culture was but ignorance, superstitious, and barbaric where as it was the other way round
13. It was not the intention of the Bri

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Pen diamond
Re: British rule was golden era in Indian History!
by Pen diamond on Oct 23, 2017 03:37 PM
13. It was not the intention of the British to establish religious freedom, intention was to loot india
14. the stats of 1857 mutiny are wrong. British killed equal numbers
15. British built railways to transport slaves and loot precious resources
16. British did not build any Universities. It was not their intention to educate this country beyond what it thought necessary
17. India had a far advanced judiciary before the advent of British
18. Kindly refer to the Puranas where History was written down to the hilt, when the libraries of India were being burnt it burnt for months
19. Sashi Tharoor knows what he is talking about,
20. HHindu Dharma produces one of the most rational, open minded and practical karma based model for living while the great abrahamic missionary that you profess is merely a faith based system.


   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
SS Nayak
Taj
by SS Nayak on Oct 19, 2017 12:07 PM  | Hide replies

Who built the Taj, it is not important. The Taj was made with Indian cost. Hence it is our property. That's all.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
sunil vaidya
Re: Taj
by sunil vaidya on Oct 20, 2017 05:23 PM
but it was built by traitors...so either it should be destroyed or it should be transferred to pakistan...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Dias
income
by Dias on Oct 19, 2017 11:30 AM

Dies it mean that all past and future income from taj mahal tourism should go to foreigners

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 127 messages Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message