So what is being contested ? That something happened or Jay Shah did something, but it should be kept private? How is someone defamed if their ROC filings are made public, analyzed? Jay Shah's and Tushar Mehta must ask the Minister of Corporate affairs why the ROC filings are allowed to be accessed by anyone and everyone :)
The guys thought they can muzzle a journalist, tough luck !
Re: Privacy ?
by anti congress on Oct 10, 2017 02:26 PM
ROC filings are public but is there any wrong doing? if not, why take his name in unwarranted manner? isn;t that a case? this is not khangress bharat who shiver to put in case against jay...
Re: Privacy ?
by Useless Comments on Oct 10, 2017 03:44 PM
Ache din for corrupt people they wanted privacy so that they can do corruption ... and Duffer PM can sing saga that we havent done any corruption
Re: Re: Re: Privacy ?
by kartavya on Oct 10, 2017 07:24 PM
auntie congress is crying since his papa and uncle are caught cheating. pls run to your papa and ask him why he cheated you and the public. btw are you too a beneficiary
Re: private?
by ashish tiwari on Oct 10, 2017 03:41 PM
In Vadra's case there was sufficient evidence of wrong doing. here there is no evidence just a media article.
Re: private?
by ashish tiwari on Oct 10, 2017 03:42 PM
In Vadra's case there was sufficient evidence of wrong doing. here there is no evidence just a media article.
Re: Re: private?
by Gladyschellam on Oct 10, 2017 05:15 PM
THE WIRE has just ignited Fire. Has to be watched. As to why the suit had opposed in Right to Privacy Act - Had the Wire furnished anything wrong - straight away sued the Wire
as a citizen we want to real and true fact and who is braking law he must be punished what part may be if jay shah is wrong as per rule he must be punished so as if the media only for political view and their news trading means business purpose published it then they must and must be punished too hard because you get a permission for news media that means you can not published any thing that is MESSAGING wrong and damaging someone . SO court media house prove their published with that matter. ACTUAL IT IS FOR THE COMING OF GUJRAT ELECTION
as a citizen we want to real and true fact and who is braking law he must be punished what part may be if jay shah is wrong as per rule he must be punished so as if the media only for political view and their news trading means business purpose published it then they must and must be punished too hard because you get a permission for news media that means you can not published any thing that is MESSAGING wrong and damaging someone . SO court media house prove their published with that matter
Re: Re: Ache din for corrupt people
by jhatu on Oct 10, 2017 05:47 PM
Auntie-Cong & At Seed Why don't you ask your boss that why this Jr. Shah's company closed just one month before Demonetization?
Re: Re: Re: Ache din for corrupt people
by Against Pseudos on Oct 10, 2017 06:49 PM
JHatU: Many things happened before DeMo. Kejri became CM before DeMo. Go crying to him and ask why? :-)
Many of the "defenders" of right to privacy are supporters of the ersewhile Soviet Union. What was the commitment of the Soviet Union to privacy is too well known as a high percentage of its government staff had only one job-to spy on the fellow citizens. If it is ok for the "liberals"(most of them are pro Soviet) they have no moral right to attack the NDA govt on this issue
