Discussion Board

Can't afford to have 'digital divide' in India: PM


Total 64 messages Pages | 1
Subodha Barik
where u hiding? mountain or your room ?
by Subodha Barik on Feb 12, 2018 07:20 PM

where going?i m targeting u new style yorker ball u only.mind it.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Subodha Barik
what u doping, i m cleaning u from politics.
by Subodha Barik on Feb 12, 2018 07:20 PM

i m targeting u .mind it.nobody helping u in earth.mind it.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
R ponnabalam
The 1.4%and 74% of GDP(Great Divide in Prosperity)
by R ponnabalam on Oct 08, 2017 01:38 PM  | Hide replies

The divide where the poorest 30 percent have just 1.4 percent of the total wealth and the top 10 percent controlled about 74 percent of national wealth as published by Credit Suisse, leaving24.6 of wealth to the remaining is THE DIVIDE we INDIAcannot afford first.Despite being a socialist country by the 42nd Amendment in 1976(40 years have gone by) to the constitution our Govts had not ensured that wealth is generated socially and shared equally by society.Governments (and the opposition should have questioned things on this in Parliament)should have regulated the ownership of land and industry to reduce socio-economic inequalities. The divide here is too great and we have failed that amendment .It will be great if the P.M. gives importance to this, and does not allow banks to give loans like 44000 crores to one or two or 10 corporates and he should let the Govt. run industries and that too efficiently He should make the the account of Local Area Development fund Public :how much we had spent what development had come about. He should ensure that these details are positively prepared in India by agencies dealing with Economics -now outsiders point out the lopsidedness and OUR INDIAN ECONOMICS IS COMFORTABLY HAPPY TELLING IN CHORUS GDP(does it meanGREAT DIVIDE in PROSPERITY?)every year linking our GDP to the rise in Standard of living of the common man and the distribution of national wealth R.PONNAMBALAM

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Against Pseudos
Re: The 1.4%and 74% of GDP(Great Divide in Prosperity)
by Against Pseudos on Oct 08, 2017 01:53 PM
Which socialist country in the world became successful?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
ravi mohota
Re: The 1.4%and 74% of GDP(Great Divide in Prosperity)
by ravi mohota on Oct 08, 2017 04:30 PM
Go to Pak. And Join CPac project of China. You can help Pak to come out from Bankruptcy..You manupulate data Better then Pakistanis . You are Negative Mind Person..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Useless Comments
social equality
by Useless Comments on Oct 08, 2017 09:18 AM  | Hide replies

look who is speaking on social equality.....

Duffer Pm please tell us why in RSS .... only upper cast Hindus are made president

Why Dalits are never made president of RSS

Why Muslims or any other minority religion is never made president of RSS

You can fix your house ... and you are taking about socity....


Empty talks again

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: social equality
by Against Pseudos on Oct 08, 2017 09:38 AM
Which Dalir became president of Kaamgress? :-)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Satyajeet Yadava
Re: Re: social equality
by Satyajeet Yadava on Oct 08, 2017 12:28 PM
D.Sanjivayya,K.Kamraj,Jagjivan Ram.Now name RSS Dalit Sarsanghchalaks????

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: social equality
by Against Pseudos on Oct 08, 2017 01:22 PM
YadVaa:
ROTFLMAO... The RaHool is a Dalit? Nice to know. :-)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Satyajeet Yadava
Re: Re: Re: Re: social equality
by Satyajeet Yadava on Oct 08, 2017 01:37 PM
U didnot reply to the query rather proved yrself a duffer!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: social equality
by Against Pseudos on Oct 08, 2017 01:54 PM
Heard of Valmiki? Sudama? Shabri? Modi himself is OBC. Kovind is Dalit. And as pert our information the RaHool is also Dalit. ROTFLMAO

Forward   |   Report abuse
Satyajeet Yadava
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: social equality
by Satyajeet Yadava on Oct 08, 2017 02:10 PM
Sudama a dalit?Gr8 invention by Sanghiiiis!!!!

Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: social equality
by Against Pseudos on Oct 08, 2017 02:21 PM
YadVaa:
Jagjivan Ram? Nice invention. :-)

Forward   |   Report abuse
anti congress
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: social equality
by anti congress on Oct 08, 2017 02:24 PM
Jagjivan ram did not hold any significant posts in khangress cattle feeder read well -:)

Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: social equality
by Against Pseudos on Oct 08, 2017 02:20 PM
No one ever heard of the RaHool taking orders from Jagjvan Ram or Sanjaiyya ... Who are they?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
anti congress
Re: social equality
by anti congress on Oct 08, 2017 10:04 AM
Who is current president of india? Who made him president of India? is president of India better or just a president of RSS? Think useful not useless...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
P S SHAH
Re: Re: social equality
by P S SHAH on Oct 08, 2017 11:50 AM
anti congress, this useless man will write only useless comments as his name suggest.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
anti congress
Re: Re: Re: social equality
by anti congress on Oct 08, 2017 11:56 AM
When you are tired of work, you would like to see someone like him..dumbo and stuxpid..that way you get relaxed from serious work and humour in life becomes better -:)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Satyajeet Yadava
Re: Re: social equality
by Satyajeet Yadava on Oct 08, 2017 12:31 PM
RSS is BJP Bauddhik(Buddhu)Guru,so more imp.President only Ru---r St--p!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: social equality
by Against Pseudos on Oct 08, 2017 01:23 PM
YadVaa:
You are Buddhu? Excellent. :-)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Satyajeet Yadava
Re: Re: Re: Re: social equality
by Satyajeet Yadava on Oct 08, 2017 01:39 PM
All Bhakts r fekuuus of d 1st order!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: social equality
by Against Pseudos on Oct 08, 2017 01:56 PM
YadVaa:
Nice to know your characteristics oh Sonya bhakt. :-)

Forward   |   Report abuse
anti congress
Re: Re: Re: social equality
by anti congress on Oct 08, 2017 12:43 PM
yes shows a typical cattle feeder brain -:)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Satyajeet Yadava
Re: Re: Re: Re: social equality
by Satyajeet Yadava on Oct 08, 2017 12:55 PM
Yrs seems to b that of a hog???

   Forward   |   Report abuse
anti congress
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: social equality
by anti congress on Oct 08, 2017 01:27 PM
as i said, I work in software..cattle feeder -:)

Forward   |   Report abuse
anti congress
Re: social equality
by anti congress on Oct 08, 2017 10:07 AM
And if you really need social equality, we need to think beyond dalits etc..if you can talking on dalits, you are dividing again..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Satyajeet Yadava
Re: Re: social equality
by Satyajeet Yadava on Oct 08, 2017 12:33 PM
Dalits r still marginalised especiaaly in Gujrat where dey cant grow Moustachhes?????

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: social equality
by Against Pseudos on Oct 08, 2017 01:24 PM
YadVaa:
Look who is talking about Dalits ... Hohohoho

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Satyajeet Yadava
Re: Re: Re: Re: social equality
by Satyajeet Yadava on Oct 08, 2017 01:42 PM
Hahaha!!!Upper caste RSs ppl talking about Dalits???Hohoho!!In their rule Dalits r dying death of humiliation???

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: social equality
by Against Pseudos on Oct 08, 2017 01:57 PM
YadVaa:
Modi and Kovind are upper caste? Then the RaHool must be an 18 year old female lingerie model. :-)

Forward   |   Report abuse
anti congress
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: social equality
by anti congress on Oct 08, 2017 02:25 PM
Good one on pappu-:)

Forward   |   Report abuse
anti congress
Re: Re: Re: social equality
by anti congress on Oct 08, 2017 12:44 PM
If this needs to stop, dividing them as dalits needs to stop..never mind a cattle feeder will never understand this..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Raghavendra Bhat
digital divide == stop use of non-free computing systems
by Raghavendra Bhat on Oct 08, 2017 08:28 AM  | Hide replies

PM Narendra Modi should understand that the continued use of non-free computing systems in all government infrastructure furthers 'digital divide' across the breadth of free Bharath. The Government of India should promulgate orders that mandate the use of free/GNU computing solutions across its various ministries and institutions, free software is more secure and all citizens can have unfettered access to such systems. The PMO has to issue directives for the use of free/GNU computing solutions immediately lest the digital divide gets to become unbridgeable and a block in India's march to full Swaraj.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: digital divide == stop use of non-free computing systems
by Against Pseudos on Oct 08, 2017 09:14 AM
Why not free hardware? Free cars? Free petrol.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Bwinde Kang
Digital-literacy without literacy?
by Bwinde Kang on Oct 08, 2017 03:26 AM  | Hide replies

The PM’s laudable goal, albeit too ambitious, appears far removed from reality. Basic literacy is key for socio-economic progress. With our literacy rate of 74% [well below world average of 84%] and having world’s largest illiterate population how far can we go for ‘digital-literacy’ is anybody’s guess. The 10% decrease in allocation on e-learning lays bare the government’s real intent!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Digital-literacy without literacy?
by Against Pseudos on Oct 08, 2017 07:50 AM
We are indeed fortunate that naysayers like you have always been smothered. :-)
You guys tried it in 1990 too but were thwarted. :-)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Bwinde Kang
Re: Re: Digital-literacy without literacy?
by Bwinde Kang on Oct 08, 2017 10:59 AM
Pls re-read my post. It is hard-core data. Blind adulation and smothering valid dissent will not help our PM achieve the goals he has set for the country.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: Digital-literacy without literacy?
by Against Pseudos on Oct 08, 2017 01:29 PM
Pls re-read my post. If you were around in 1990, then Rajeev Gandhi would have not been helped. Correct. :-)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Satyajeet Yadava
Re: Re: Re: Digital-literacy without literacy?
by Satyajeet Yadava on Oct 08, 2017 12:34 PM
BhKts will always b blind,will never see reason!!!

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
anti congress
Re: Re: Re: Re: Digital-literacy without literacy?
by anti congress on Oct 08, 2017 12:43 PM
and what about cattle feeder peabrain like you?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Useless Comments
Re: Digital-literacy without literacy?
by Useless Comments on Oct 08, 2017 09:20 AM
He is a joker.... Pappu PM.... Big Mouth Duffer

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Digital-literacy without literacy?
by Against Pseudos on Oct 08, 2017 09:39 AM
Duffer Rajeev said same things. :-)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Satyajeet Yadava
Re: Re: Re: Digital-literacy without literacy?
by Satyajeet Yadava on Oct 08, 2017 12:36 PM
Rajeev laid the foundations of Digital India,which now they r boasting anout!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: Re: Digital-literacy without literacy?
by Against Pseudos on Oct 08, 2017 01:25 PM
YadVaa:
Tue foundation was laid by Mangal Pandey. :-)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
anti congress
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Digital-literacy without literacy?
by anti congress on Oct 08, 2017 01:29 PM
Leave him..he is a peabrain cattle feeder -:)

Forward   |   Report abuse
Satyajeet Yadava
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Digital-literacy without literacy?
by Satyajeet Yadava on Oct 08, 2017 01:46 PM
Truth is now no Jhumla working,ground beneath BJP slipping

Forward   |   Report abuse
anti congress
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Digital-literacy without literacy?
by anti congress on Oct 08, 2017 01:50 PM
Ground below you is slipping and you think others are slipping

Forward   |   Report abuse
P S SHAH
Re: Re: Digital-literacy without literacy?
by P S SHAH on Oct 08, 2017 11:51 AM
And what about you useless and coward ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
anti congress
Re: Digital-literacy without literacy?
by anti congress on Oct 08, 2017 10:06 AM
You have a valid point that literacy rate needs to be improved. This should happen regardless of digital stuff. Right now digital will help people who are educated in performing actions. Also there should be possibility of manually doing it for illiterate people as well.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
piri
Komaaaali Modis
by piri on Oct 08, 2017 12:22 AM  | Hide replies


nasal tone in his very grating voice (kraaaa....kraaaa.......kraaa...... is the nearest articulation perhaps possible for his braying voice), coupled with his theatrics on stage and his desperate attempts to defend the indefensible, may even begin to tell on the nerves of the stupxidest segment of the Indian population - North Indian commoners !

Case of making even stupxid people wake up to reality with the sheer volume of lies and half lies dished out to them ?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Komaaaali Modis
by Against Pseudos on Oct 08, 2017 07:46 AM
Komaali Pani Puri:
Nice to see your crying in full volume. :-)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
P S SHAH
Re: Komaaaali Modis
by P S SHAH on Oct 08, 2017 11:55 AM
Kalia stinking komaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaali whatefver nonsense you may write against Modi and BJP out of depression, frustration, jealousy it will not have absolutely no effect. Butbeing a totally useless and jobless man, one can not stop you from writing long and useless comments and repeated copy paste as it is the only activity you can afford to pass all your idle time free of cost. Have you ever written anything about the party you blindly support, their vote share on all India level and the reasons why they are rejected by the people all over the country for years ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Satyajeet Yadava
Re:Digital Divide
by Satyajeet Yadava on Oct 08, 2017 12:10 AM

1st unite the hearts divided by saaaanghhhiìiii ideology,then try to fill the "Digital"Divide???

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Total 64 messages Pages: | 1
Write a message