Dear fellow countrymen, The only objective of this post is to highlight the biggest gaffe committed by the producers and director of the film Padmavati in the cast itself. It is an Indian psyche that we associate the reel life characters to their real life and expect the same kind of nobility and purity from them. That's the reason a Prithviraj kapur cast as Akbar on stage may not bow down to the Indian prime minister as he considers himself at that point of time a bigger entity than PM himself and the PM too sportingly has to accept the fact. By the same logic the PM prays to Ram Laxman during the annual Ram leela event although the actors themselves are lesser beings. Sanjay Leela had committed the same mistake in showing a Rajputani in a love relationship with a pastoral class in his movie Ram-Leela, however was forgiven although both the castes were offended as it is fact of history that no marital relationships exists and the men women of either caste share the most relationship of brother and sister with end number of instances where the honour of each is protected by the other at life cost. Hence Sanjay has the habit of doing this things and later claiming innocence as he did by previewing the movie before select media persons to get it certified even before the censor board did so. For the Rajputs, the queen is nothing less than a deity, however are in a minority compared to the remaining fellow citizens but do the majority have a right to hurt the sentiments..
Re: The Fake cast
by AJAY SARVAIYA on Nov 23, 2017 11:25 AM
Request to Editor to delete the repeat posts..In continuation of the earlier post..of a minority and if yes, then the ideals cherished in the constitution of this republic are threatened. Jauhar, the ultimate self-sacrifice to protect ones honour by the queen and thousands of such Rajputanis who self-immolated themselves rather than falling prey to the brute invader revealed human spirit at its zenith which also astonished the winner and making him feel like a loser. The barbarians had to modify their view of Hindu society which protected them from further forceful conversions. Sanjay Leela started on the wrong foot by playing with this noble sentiments by the cast itself with Deepika playing the noble character with her boyfriend with whom as everyone knows is having a live in relationship and who plays Khilji, so even if the movie does not carry any scene together as certified by the select media persons who previewed this movie, the relationship of the cast itself is an anathema and a mischief played knowingly or unknowingly to play with the sentiments and this issue has been entirely missed out by all concerned and could have been averted at the beginning itself.
Dear fellow countrymen, The only objective of this post is to highlight the biggest gaffe committed by the producers and director of the film Padmavati in the cast itself. It is an Indian psyche that we associate the reel life characters to their real life and expect the same kind of nobility and purity from them. That's the reason a Prithviraj kapur cast as Akbar on stage may not bow down to the Indian prime minister as he considers himself at that point of time a bigger entity than PM himself and the PM too sportingly has to accept the fact. By the same logic the PM prays to Ram Laxman during the annual Ram leela event although the actors themselves are lesser beings. Sanjay Leela had committed the same mistake in showing a Rajputani in a love relationship with a pastoral class in his movie Ram-Leela, however was forgiven although both the castes were offended as it is fact of history that no marital relationships exists and the men women of either caste share the most relationship of brother and sister with end number of instances where the honour of each is protected by the other at life cost. Hence Sanjay has the habit of doing this things and later claiming innocence as he did by previewing the movie before select media persons to get it certified even before the censor board did so. For the Rajputs, the queen is nothing less than a deity, however are in a minority compared to the remaining fellow citizens but do the majority have a right to hurt the sentiments..
Dear fellow countrymen, The only objective of this post is to highlight the biggest gaffe committed by the producers and director of the film Padmavati in the cast itself. It is an Indian psyche that we associate the reel life characters to their real life and expect the same kind of nobility and purity from them. That's the reason a Prithviraj kapur cast as Akbar on stage may not bow down to the Indian prime minister as he considers himself at that point of time a bigger entity than PM himself and the PM too sportingly has to accept the fact. By the same logic the PM prays to Ram Laxman during the annual Ram leela event although the actors themselves are lesser beings. Sanjay Leela had committed the same mistake in showing a Rajputani in a love relationship with a pastoral class in his movie Ram-Leela, however was forgiven although both the castes were offended as it is fact of history that no marital relationships exists and the men women of either caste share the most relationship of brother and sister with end number of instances where the honour of each is protected by the other at life cost. Hence Sanjay has the habit of doing this things and later claiming innocence as he did by previewing the movie before select media persons to get it certified even before the censor board did so. For the Rajputs, the queen is nothing less than a deity, however are in a minority compared to the remaining fellow citizens but do the majority have a right to hurt the sentiments..
Dear fellow countrymen, The only objective of this post is to highlight the biggest gaffe committed by the producers and director of the film Padmavati in the cast itself. It is an Indian psyche that we associate the reel life characters to their real life and expect the same kind of nobility and purity from them. That's the reason a Prithviraj kapur cast as Akbar on stage may not bow down to the Indian prime minister as he considers himself at that point of time a bigger entity than PM himself and the PM too sportingly has to accept the fact. By the same logic the PM prays to Ram Laxman during the annual Ram leela event although the actors themselves are lesser beings. Sanjay Leela had committed the same mistake in showing a Rajputani in a love relationship with a pastoral class in his movie Ram-Leela, however was forgiven although both the castes were offended as it is fact of history that no marital relationships exists and the men women of either caste share the most relationship of brother and sister with end number of instances where the honour of each is protected by the other at life cost. Hence Sanjay has the habit of doing this things and later claiming innocence as he did by previewing the movie before select media persons to get it certified even before the censor board did so. For the Rajputs, the queen is nothing less than a deity, however are in a minority compared to the remaining fellow citizens but do the majority have a right to hurt the sentiments..
Dear fellow countrymen, The only objective of this post is to highlight the biggest gaffe committed by the producers and director of the film Padmavati in the cast itself. It is an Indian psyche that we associate the reel life characters to their real life and expect the same kind of nobility and purity from them. That's the reason a Prithviraj kapur cast as Akbar on stage may not bow down to the Indian prime minister as he considers himself at that point of time a bigger entity than PM himself and the PM too sportingly has to accept the fact. By the same logic the PM prays to Ram Laxman during the annual Ram leela event although the actors themselves are lesser beings. Sanjay Leela had committed the same mistake in showing a Rajputani in a love relationship with a pastoral class in his movie Ram-Leela, however was forgiven although both the castes were offended as it is fact of history that no marital relationships exists and the men women of either caste share the most relationship of brother and sister with end number of instances where the honour of each is protected by the other at life cost. Hence Sanjay has the habit of doing this things and later claiming innocence as he did by previewing the movie before select media persons to get it certified even before the censor board did so. For the Rajputs, the queen is nothing less than a deity, however are in a minority compared to the remaining fellow citizens but do the majority have a right to hurt the sentiments..
Dear fellow countrymen, The only objective of this post is to highlight the biggest gaffe committed by the producers and director of the film Padmavati in the cast itself. It is an Indian psyche that we associate the reel life characters to their real life and expect the same kind of nobility and purity from them. That's the reason a Prithviraj kapur cast as Akbar on stage may not bow down to the Indian prime minister as he considers himself at that point of time a bigger entity than PM himself and the PM too sportingly has to accept the fact. By the same logic the PM prays to Ram Laxman during the annual Ram leela event although the actors themselves are lesser beings. Sanjay Leela had committed the same mistake in showing a Rajputani in a love relationship with a pastoral class in his movie Ram-Leela, however was forgiven although both the castes were offended as it is fact of history that no marital relationships exists and the men women of either caste share the most relationship of brother and sister with end number of instances where the honour of each is protected by the other at life cost. Hence Sanjay has the habit of doing this things and later claiming innocence as he did by previewing the movie before select media persons to get it certified even before the censor board did so. For the Rajputs, the queen is nothing less than a deity, however are in a minority compared to the remaining fellow citizens but do the majority have a right to hurt the sentiments..
it is sad that bhansali is trying to release his movie in pakistan...looks like he will have to wait till 2019 to release the movie...sad that we have to live in pakistan for 5 years...
bhansali has made an excellent movie which shows the valour of rajput and praising them....but idiots who want to ban the movie dont understand this...
Re: hi
by daniel thorat on Nov 23, 2017 12:02 AM
Right. Actually, it is not necessary to sing the valour of Rajputs, for the simple fact that they were obviously not united and lost to Khilji. Padmini herself seems to be more a myth rather than hard historical fact. Was surprised to read and hear that she was the 15th wife of the Rana. History demands a corroboration from a third uninvolved party about valour etc. which seems unavailable.Chances are inspite of this senseless issue, the BJP may not reap electoral benefits.
is speaking like a fool, he is anti Rajput or favouring Bhansali, is not clear from the words coming out from his big mouth. but he has habit to speak some absurd words. No one cares for his remarks.
Re: shot gun
by daniel thorat on Nov 23, 2017 12:08 AM
The Shotgun, along with brilliant minds and true nationalists like Yashwant Sinha, Shourie, and many others from BJP and all over the country, are trying to save parts of this country from being ruled by people like some Yogi and Chaouhan and Raje etc. But the self-serving netas have lost their sense of balance and are trying to please the fountainhead of the present situation in all areas of this country.
On the one hand Mr. Sinha says he will speak after S L Bhansali. And then on the other hand he asks why Amitabh Bachchan, Aamir Khan and Shah Rukh Khan have not spoken. He is being duplicitous.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Duplicity
by anilsharma on Nov 23, 2017 07:45 AM
Again sado day B day it comes to know by ur Msg dat ur memory power is decreasing.. So take treatment immediately
Re: Duplicity
by daniel thorat on Nov 23, 2017 12:11 AM
He knows the reasons are Panama papers, anti-minority policy of the govt. coupled of realistic fear of abuse of State powers to punish those falling out of line.
