AUTHOR SEEMS TO BE WRITING NON SENSE.IN OUR COUNTRY ALL 150 CRORE INDIANS BLINDLY TRUST MODI SIR,AMIT SHAH SIR AND TEAM BJP.AADHAR CARD IS OK WITH ALL AT PRESENT AND IN FUTURE IF MODI SIR AND TEAM SAYS IT IS BAD ,IT WILL BE BAD FOR ALL 150 CRORE INDIANS THATS IT. S.S.KASANA
Re: AADHAR
by Parameswaran on Nov 23, 2017 06:26 PM
Had the congress ruled country , the same aadhar would have become very scientific and reliable in the eyes of author
Re: AADHAR
by krishna on Nov 27, 2017 01:17 PM
Aadhaar and related projects as per the article are "arbitrary because there was no feasibility study and no cost-benefit analysis that preceded their launch." The author is talking about analysis prior to the launch of the project. You say, "National Institute of Public Finance and Policy had done the cost benefit study in 2012." UID/Aadhaar was launched on September 29, 2009. As to the analysis by National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, the fact is that it is "based almost entirely on unrealistic assumptions." The anonymous authors of this report failed to disclose their affiliation with UIDAI. This report MacroFinance group at NIPFP, a government-funded institution had a project from UIDAI on financial inclusion. It is apparent that the cost-benefit analysis itself was effectively sponsored by the UIDAI. Funding from the UIDAI to this entity created a conflict of interest, which was not disclosed in the report. It fails to take into "account alternative technologies that could achieve the same or similar savings, possibly at lower cost." NIPFP report admits that there are no “robust” estimates of duplicates and ghosts.
