REMOVE ARTICLE 370 LET ESTABLISH PANDITHS AND ALL OTHER INDIANSIN KASHMIR, AUTOMATIC TOURISAM WILL DEVELOP KASHMIRIS BUSINESS WILL IMPROVE YOUTH WILL GET JOBS. TERRARISTS AND PAKISTAN WILL BE ANSWERED.
Re: ARTICLE 370
by some one on Oct 04, 2017 03:04 PM
1. Pandits should have and should fight their war with their own hands first and not depend on being spoon fed. Government should not help those who do not help themselves first.
2. War with the foreign enemy must be fought through scientific management instead of being handled by non professional like politicians or civilian officials.
3. All senior civilian officials must have at least 5 years of combat experience in the forces if they wish to reach the senior levels of government. An IAS recruit must first of all go into the army, serve 5 years and only then join his own civilian positions.
National security is serious issue and brave soldiers are trying to protect us from hostile forces in hostile situation but ignoring this vital fact,judiciary is speaking unnecessarily in these sensitive issues better it focuses on giving effective and prompt justice to common men,harassed by each & every segment of judicial system.
Re: Why judiciary speaks in matters where it should no t??
by Sandeep Singh on May 13, 2017 11:34 AM
Parliament has to make law against judiciary interfering directly in matters of National Security
Judiciary should stay out of Defense matters which concerns the security of the country! Let us face it there is an undeclared war on our Western borders as well as with the Maoists!
Re: Leave out Army
by Sandeep Singh on May 13, 2017 11:35 AM
Parliament has to make law against judiciary interfering directly in matters of National Security
Judiciary should be more concerned about how to clear the backlog of millions of court cases which are pending for more than 25-30 years rather than worry about human rights of stone pelters, jehadis and naxalites.
Re: War Like Situation
by Sandeep Singh on May 13, 2017 11:35 AM
Parliament has to make law against judiciary interfering directly in matters of National Security
If so, why U R sparing traitors like Abdullahs? Why U R treating paid stone pelters and flag raiders as our citizens? where are rubber / plastic bullets to scare them?
In order to protect the National interests, SC should stay away from meddling in AFSA related issues. Beside an independent institution, SC is also a National Institution, it should not forget. Protecting the borders of the country is not just the duties of the Armed forces but all of us.
Re: SC should stay away from AFSA
by Sandeep Singh on May 13, 2017 11:36 AM
Parliament has to make law against judiciary interfering directly in matters of National Security
The so called human right activists should be sent to Kashmir to stand with our Military and face stone pelters. Let us see how they deal with the situation. You can talk anything sitting in AC cabins.
