Absolutely not. Jinnah was a well established political leader with a clear head and roadmap for the creation of Pakistan when he married his much younger bride. The single minded pursuit of his goal did not permit space for any other activity that conjugal duties would have demanded. The marriage was doomed right from the beginning.
Only goes to prove that the British left the job of administering the Indian sub-continent to two broken widowers. Mr Patel didn't weigh in until it was too late. Mr Gandhi was literally left high and dry, a fakir
Ravan was destroyed by the evil sister Soorpanaga. Jinnah too was aided by a religion oriented sister . PAK perhaps was created to help USA to fight Russia during the peak of its Cold War. Perhaps UK helped it aiming to get a twin benefit of dividing India and helping USA.
Re: Coincidence
by palanki narayana on May 02, 2018 09:23 PM
Fathima Jinnah was not religious (just like her brother) and played no role in pre-independence politics. She contested an election against Ayub Khan when the latter introduced "basic" democracy in Pakistan. She lost.
Mr.Jinha was a man with full of jelous.Mr.Nehru was full of ego and dosent carry Commom sence and thus we saw a division of a great country with a permanent enemy. Will u appreciate British mind?
Re: Jinha & Gandhi
by palanki narayana on May 02, 2018 09:18 PM
Partition was inevitable. Rajagopalachari was perceptive enough to warn his colleagues to prepare for the division. It had cost him the President's post.
Re: jinnahs
by raj on May 03, 2017 02:54 PM
pakistan is a cancer arm ...it is better it was amputated...do you want the all those terrorists to occupy the joint nation completely..
Re: Rediff don't have relevant topics to post
by pk kh on May 03, 2017 12:35 PM
That amputed MC was Evil...and leading group of Evils..but due to soft corner of Nehru ji the problem still persists and we are paying a big price inside and at the border as well
