i know chinese more than their own mathers know them. The PLA already started an attack plan 5-6 years ago. everything including stationing of troops in PoK. silk route blah blah is a cover for what is its final agenda towards west. annex eastern india and get an easy route to sea than go to pak. ...poor indian civil passed, life failed babus in RAW are looking elsewhere.
Re: now i will make the point
by Force Kirpan on Jun 29, 2017 09:16 PM
gwadar is only plan B... its not plan A ...chinese are too clever to put their investments in a country where loyalties change by the hour. chinese would never like to pay ransom and move across NWFP towards gwadar. This whole silk route theory is to contain india... than any particular trade benefit... china cannot make anything more than what it is making today ...so read them silently... never utter anything. any admonishment is required then let the business end take care of it
on what basis is this two front doctrine framed ? and why does indian army brass always make it a point to discuss this in media ? ...if only 20 % of kashmir population is indulging in stone pelting, it takes a whole army and country's elite to pacify them. imagine if tomorrow both the fronts open up and entire kashmir population revolts and jams all roads ...what if trouble erupts in northeast too ?
what is two front theory based on ? ...i dont believe indian politicians ever. they are most incompetent bunch in whole universe. if they want i would go on to say that parliamentary democracy is unavoidable curse on india. its like malignant cancer. u cannot get rid of it and yet you die along with it.
MPs ...congress BJP CPM JDU TMC RJD ....man ...do we need any more enemies ...probably we would be better under chinese than these parties... if anyone from them still sees this
Re: what is two front
by Force Kirpan on Jun 29, 2017 09:05 PM
the UPA government sat on defence procurement for 10 years... procuring nothing. expecting what ? ..... MMRCA still not realized.
History of 1962 would not repeat. If China declares war with India , we can create such an havoc on China that it would loosing bigger and developed cities compared to an hostile hilly land. Further Modi has not done the same mistake of Nehru. He has already made the West to realise the hegemonistic game plan of China. Additionally India now has the same power of commercial tools to hit China hard. More than any thing USA and RUSSIA would be willing to be oppose China to support India . Above all non ISLAMIC world would have by now would have realised the damage a war could create on a developed Country by witnessing the visual presentation by the affected country to name a single example- Syria.
The country suffered a lot and even today it is facing problem from China and Pakistan because of hasty and wrong decisions taken by Nehru and subsequent wrong policies of congress who ruled us for a long period. Every Indian should understand that giving the nation in to the hands of congress would be a disaster for India
I do not think ,going against china is a wise decision in the current scenario. In case of a war with China no doubt that it is going to be also with Pakistan.Right now we do not know who are there with us(Countries), Also we do not know what could be the Russia's and Iran's stand in case of a war. Being close with America,all these countries may stay back from us. If Japan,US,South Africa,Israel and India form a team like NATO, then ,confidently we can face both China and Pakistan.Till that point of time better to be good with China. Refusing China,s products itself will be a good blow to China
All our problems started when China annexed Tibbet unopposed in 1952.The nincompoop Indian PM nehru allowed this to happen. But Modis India is a different India. We will liberate Tibbet from the hands of the Chinese this time. A buffer country will ensure our distance from those yellows.
what the chinese spokesperson said is true. we should stop rhetoric. but the business end of the stick should show results in the scenario of a sustained interference on both fronts. open war may not be the scenario. but it is more like no war front and no ceasefire. that is dangerous situation. if both parties can up the ante by helping separatist groups then army would find itself more and more in an unwelcome situation.
unfortunate thing is...in so called indian great parliament system according to our MPs... continual dissent of ruling party is the only way to justice... and in that process, even if we have to lose our freedom once again, then so be it.
Re: Internal Treats
by Force Kirpan on Jun 29, 2017 08:47 PM
internal threats does not mean muslims. ofcourse u cannot think beyond ur religion ...myopic? ...internal means maoists
