In fact,J&K has been internationalized as early as 1947.It is wrong to say what ever do now is to divert attention from J&K.Is it possible to cover up J&K in a democracy-at least in India?
Pakistan must thank a biased British rulers who were wary of India becoming powerful in the region and so helped Pakistan grab ‘B’ mainly to make it comparable to India in size to ensure some semblance of balance of power in the region.That explains the British creation of K problem too and its partisan support to Pak on the issue all along. Not just British but the Americans too were wary of rise of a non-aligned India that wouldn't be its ally which explains its arming of Pakistan to teeth against India including Nukes to counter a rising India. The end result of both the British and the U.S. have been to turn Pakistan into a military state given its anti-democratic Islamic ethos to maintain the balance of power in the region. However over the decades it has backfired with both the British and the U.S. suffering on account of the terror emanating from the Af-Pak region although overall Pak gaining militarily due to its strategic partnership with the U.S. India too suffered Pak terror due to West conveniently looking the other way. However thanks to a strong foundation of Indian democratic polity as also its growth in military strength it could dismember Pakistan into two w/o much of a fight due to the geographic separation advantage as also the diversity between east and West Pak. However given that Pak army is much stronger entity now and India cannot perform a “la-Bangladesh” on B-liberation due to the geography the approach have to be a
Re: SEPARTION OF 'B' WILL HELP WEST APPROPRIATE PAK NUKES
by damodaran mohan on Sep 06, 2016 05:48 PM
(contd.)..due to the geography the approach have to be a protracted effort with at least one big power like U.S. to be actively part of the effort. It will be in U.S. interest too because with Pak reduced to 50% of its size it will be lot easier appropriating the Pak nukes which could become an ‘Islamic threat’ to west ultimately. Thus India and the U.S. and West in general must work for separation of ‘B’ from Pakistan which will be in the interest of world peace.
The Interna national recognition of Balochistan struggle now initiated through the Prime Minister of neihbouring country of Pakistan.Being part of their Pakistan the struggle there is due to economic conditions and imbalances with in their country.where as Kashmir issue which remains as sour point of difference between two countries is certainly better developed and can further progress if only peace,law and order are maintained.Indian border continue to porous as both Nations are showing interest to trade and have relationship for economic progress.Even China is also interested to extend the corridor for business purpose.Kashmir is already an issue made international much to the reluctance of Indian authorities.Pakistan does not want settlement by way of negitiation and discussions.There is little like any other Prime Minister like in the past Shri Narendra Modi Ji can do even after mobilising support from International community.Now the world is concerned is threatened with falling economies and raising inflation costs due to lack of funds for development.people need more than all these issues jobs and economic upliftment.India better focuses on these issue and like wisr Pakistan than raising adrenalin and instigating people on both sides of border
Re: All fine about Balochi struggle
by paul theo on Sep 05, 2016 10:31 AM
VAJPAYEE STARTED BUS SERVICE TO PAKISTAN AND WE GOT KARGIL WHERE WE LOST 600 SOLDIERS, MODIJI WENT TO HAVE TEA IN LAHORE AND WE GOT PATHANKOT, THIS IS THEIR FOREIGN POLICY
Pakistan was the ambition to have Baburstan in Indian subcontinet.It was ably assisted by the left -over British empire machinations and Kashmir went on to become in lime light courtesy NATO, CENTO, HAROLD WILSON,WEST ASIAN-FREE DOLLAR to PAK and thereby the international intervention .If one beats you, do show the the cheek if he is a man ie man enoungh to have the humanity not to beat.If he would beat again , you are a fool that you did not understand that he is not fit enough to be called a man.To such a man knock of his teeth and give in his hands..This is what I was taught by my class 8th teacher, a devout good Christian , a good man to the core.India could not do it keeps mumbling that our problems are in neighbourhood Anybody has to be paid back in the same coin.R.PONNAMBALAM
It was part of India and we need it back. what is the need to embarrass pakistan over Baloch issue sooner or later it will be the part of India again...
Re: It was part of India.
by Logic Wins on Sep 02, 2016 11:58 PM
If you allow Modi and our country to speak and fight for a outside country like balochistan, tomorrow those pakis will have all the excuses to fight & speak for kashmiris. So talk with brain, don't talk brainless ideas.
Re: It was part of India.
by Desh Bhakt Sipahi on Sep 03, 2016 06:36 AM
Had India taken this stance since INC ruled India, Pakistan would have been only constricted to only Punjab and rest of the provinces would have been separate country or would have been with India.
