Re: double standards!!!
by Biswajyoti Borkakoty on Dec 03, 2016 09:28 AM
No disrespect to the National anthem but originally the national anthem was composed to eugolized King George V.
'Jana Gana Mana' was first sung in 1911 in praise of King George V. Tagore was awarded with Knighthood in 1915 by the King. Though, Tagore vehemently backtracked that in 1937 (after King's death in 1936) and denied that it was meant for the Emperor George V.
However the Translation of the all the five stanza (national anthem is the first stanza) of his Brahmo hymn 'Bharot Bhagyo Bidhata' reveals who the supreme King it was devoted to...
National Anthem deserves respect not order. I dont think that singing national anthem in private events will do any value addition to patriotism. It should be made mandatory before the starting of any national event.
After "China Attack" on India.. in 1962 It was A Tradition To Play National Anthem in Theaters. It Certaintly Increases Feelings Of People Towards Nation.
Re: After 'China Attack' on India.. in 1962 It was A Tradition
by ravi mohota on Dec 02, 2016 04:35 PM
After "China Attack" on India.. in 1962 It was A Tradition To Play National Anthem in Theaters. It Certaintly Increases Feelings Of People Towards Nation.
Re: pathogenic patriotism
by rishi on Dec 02, 2016 03:36 PM
there is nothing "wrong" in thinking patriotically even if some others may not agree.....like in this case that the Supreme Court has decided against making it mandatory, which is also perfectly ok.
Re: pathogenic patriotism
by ravi mohota on Dec 02, 2016 04:37 PM
After "China Attack" on India.. in 1962 It was A Tradition To Play National Anthem in Theaters. It Certaintly Increases Feelings Of People Towards Nation.
Re: practise what you preach supreme court
by ravi mohota on Dec 02, 2016 04:37 PM
After "China Attack" on India.. in 1962 It was A Tradition To Play National Anthem in Theaters. It Certaintly Increases Feelings Of People Towards Nation.
First PM stopped use of currency notes n now the court order to respect National Anthem. It is just to haress people n make mockery of our own national anthem like our national flag which is found on roads n gutters after 15 Aug n 26 Jan. The National Anthem should be made compulsary in all courts n Parliments before proceedings n also in Mantralya at a fixed time in mornings. Y haress only common people. Let the law makers also get the feelings of common man
Re: Just to harress people.
by Against Pseudos on Dec 02, 2016 02:58 PM
Domnic: How many lakhs had you stored in 1000 and 500 notes? I am happy that tax chors like you were harassed.
Re: Just to harress people.
by Against Pseudos on Dec 02, 2016 07:52 PM
Domnic: How many lakhs had you stored in 1000 and 500 notes? I am happy that tax chors like you were harassed.
If you see a filthy movie, why to endorse our sacred national anthem to it. Courts are related to government activity, why not sing anthem before proceeding?
Re: Double standards
by Anti on Dec 02, 2016 06:10 PM
Courts are related to normal people as well as govt. National anthem singing in court might make sense more than movies yes
Arnt court or offices or public meetings..supposed to b sacrosant where serious work is done , which decides the future of the country & wher to instill a sense of patriotism makes sense ..rather than making it compulsory in a a frivolous place like a movie hall..wher people may have gone to watch Sunny Leone !!! What has happened to the sanity of thought process in this country ???
Arnt court or offices or public meetings..supposed to b sacrosant where serious work is done , which decides the future of the country & wher to instill a sense of patriotism makes sense ..rather than making it compulsory in a a frivolous place like a movie hall..wher people may have gone to watch Sunny Leone !!! What has happened to the sanity of thought process in this country ???
when modi comes out of house he should sing national anthem and then start work and not drink heavily and speak
modi also drinks like mann and then speaks.
what about the parliament why national anthem is not in parliament or in government offices first coming into the offices they should do national anthem.
modi knows people will stop going to films if he insists for national anthem it happened last time also whne bjp insisted people stoped going to the films.
and now government officers are aking for 2000 rupees notes as under table money and modi says corruption has ended
Re: modi should start first
by CHAKRABORTY I on Dec 02, 2016 02:17 PM
hey which planet are you coming from??? Any patriot will go to cinema hall & sing the national anthem. Only madrassha output like you will cite it as an excuse fot not going to film
Re: modi should start first
by Against Pseudos on Dec 02, 2016 02:59 PM
You wrote stories in 2002. Modi won. You wrote stories in 2014. Modi won. So pls carry on writing stories. Very nice of you. :-)
Re: Re: modi should start first
by P S SHAH on Dec 02, 2016 03:57 PM
In 2024 also they will continue writing their story of 2002 and will conveniently forget 1984 due to lack of long memory.
Re: modi should start first
by Against Pseudos on Dec 02, 2016 07:53 PM
You wrote stories in 2002. Modi won. You wrote stories in 2014. Modi won. So pls carry on writing stories. Very nice of you. :-)
