looted Asia and Africa, the riches found in Europe is all due to earlier loot of their raw material and cheap labour, they made railways and roads to make loot swift and quick. As regards Education in India , Every Village in India we had a School but Britishers abolished and destroyed that system and patronized their own education to sustain longer in India through english knowing Clerks in their offices to converse with locals . As They had no capability to learn our language and further those who are posted in India , most of them were on punishment posting in India and out lawed persons of their own country. What else u could expect from such persons ? Brutality , Exploitation, loot, divide and rule, destruction of Culture, etc..
Re: Breaking India
by aam admi on Sep 29, 2014 04:24 PM
who is Malhotra ? I never heard him as a writer ? if u, please read and be happy.Must be ur friend, u r not holding good company, make change for good.
Re: British rule was the golden era in the history of India
by Wasim Akhtar on Sep 28, 2014 02:31 PM
there were negatives as well about the british rule but overall they are a lot better than our own deshi netas who are ripping off the country without caring for the people
Re: Re: British rule was the golden era in the history of India
by mandook raj on Sep 28, 2014 03:47 PM
One is free to choose between slavery under the British and freedom.
Re: British rule was the golden era in the history of India
by SRAO on Sep 28, 2014 02:42 PM
Not only for India,they have gifted good public administration system where ever they ruled,only limiting factor is racist behavior which finally put an end to their rule.India is a land of Wisdom and knowledge but middle east invasions ruined their identity.
Re: Re: British rule was the golden era in the history of India
by mandook raj on Sep 28, 2014 03:48 PM
What system? Only red tape system which prmotes, breeds and spreads corruption at all levels
Re: Re: British rule was the golden era in the history of India
by SRAO on Sep 28, 2014 04:32 PM
Burning of Nalanda university was a biggest disaster.Anyway British united India as a single kingdom to a major extent and sardar patel completed rest except j&k
Re: British rule was the golden era in the history of India
by nitmohan on Sep 28, 2014 03:00 PM
for conversions of religions the Missionaries use to put breads in the wells of GOA ........
Re: British rule was the golden era in the history of India
by Jagdish Dubey on Sep 28, 2014 03:20 PM
"According to economic historian Angus Maddison in his book The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective, India was the richest country in the world and had the world's largest economy until the 17th century AD. British economist, Angus Maddison argues that India's share of the world income went from 27% in 1700 (compared to Europe's share of 23%) to 3% in 1950.[17] Modern economic historians have blamed the colonial rule for the dismal state of India's economy, investment in Indian industries was limited since it was a colony"Wiki. Nothing left to add!
Re: Re: Re: British rule was the golden era in the history of Ind
by mandook raj on Sep 28, 2014 03:50 PM
Unlike some sections of population, we should not believe in quantity but strive to improve quality.
Re: British rule was the golden era in the history of India
by ayalur madhu on Sep 28, 2014 06:50 PM
Wished you had also written about the negatives of the rule to balance your thought. What about the treasures looted, the deforestation in the Himalaya's to lay railway tracks back in England, a ship load of silver which was found sunk of late and a host of similar instances which exposes their misdeeds.
Re: British rule was the golden era in the history of India
by sanjeev singla on Sep 29, 2014 02:33 PM
missionary: your points appeal to be right. with post bindependence it was sardar PATEL who kept and aligned the fragment states with India post independence.
Re: British rule was the golden era in the history of India
by aam admi on Sep 29, 2014 04:27 PM
for person who has slavery genes in the blood of their forfathers we can't help it ? enjoy ur slavery and live like a faithful pet.
D. Goel Pklafternoon SAunday 28th September . 2014 It isgreat proud moment for theaccomplished swinger Madam Kavitaji to play to thebig audience in madison Squareassembled to listen to PMModiji in Newyork, on hisarrival on friday last.All indians must feltsynergy and bonhomie of feeling on People from far &Near gathered to have a look charismatic Modi come to meet US President.it is s festival time for indian families there. D. Goel
Re: Re: Sickular forces must oppose this....
by ram bachan on Sep 28, 2014 01:19 PM
Mr. Wasim Akhtar, People like you can never understand National Anthem, My question is: If u don't understand National Anthem of India, then how u can say to change national Anthem.. first Understand then give your Opinion ....
Re: Re: Re: Sickular forces must oppose this....
by Wasim Akhtar on Sep 28, 2014 02:20 PM
Mr.Ram, national anthem was written before partition. Now Sind is in pakistan which shows that it is no longer relevant. besides, it should be in a language which is presently understood by the common man.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Sickular forces must oppose this....
by Indian on Sep 28, 2014 03:19 PM
Wasim,
Sindh in the anthem stands for Sindhi people, not place. Because the word Maratha, in the same line was never a place or land, but people. As far as language is concerned, they cannot have 'Kya bolti tu' just because it is sung by a Khan, and understood by common man. Take the example of prayers, half of a specific community doesnt understand that language in India, but recite it 5 times a day. Should we talk about changing that?
But I do agree that National Anthem should be changed, because it was originally a 5-paragraph poem written in honour of King George (Bharat Bhagya Vidhata), and it has nothing to do with Indians.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Sickular forces must oppose this....
by mandook raj on Sep 28, 2014 03:54 PM
Common man understands it well. It is only some uncommon people protest that they do not understand. Sorry for them. Anthem cannot be changed for some people, they should learn the meaning and the tune and the text.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Sickular forces must oppose this....
by SRAO on Sep 28, 2014 04:22 PM
There was a discussion on Sind sometime back,now it cooled down.Meaning appears that it is praise of a king. I may be wrong.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Sickular forces must oppose this....
by SRAO on Sep 28, 2014 04:27 PM
It is n Bengali.I feel words like Bharatabhagya vidhata,Adhinayaka,to be changed,as they are praising words for British king and in their place new words can be incorporated.
Re: Re: Re: Sickular forces must oppose this....
by Amresh Chandra Mathur on Sep 28, 2014 05:53 PM
a pseudo nationalist always writes like this. Remember more than 30 percent of voters have not voted for modi. Will you say the same for them.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Sickular forces must oppose this....
by gottachange on Sep 29, 2014 06:59 AM
Amresh. You seem to be a Glass half empty guy. no point expliaining to you. You will still see negative. Try and see truth i am not sure you can but try.
