Discussion Board

RSS: Love jihad concerns the fate of Hindu girls


Total 109 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Muhammed
There's general consensus
by Muhammed on Oct 21, 2014 11:25 AM  | Hide replies

that Indian girls are more qualified these days and also earning well.. This has made them reach out of a "middle class" man for marriage. Getting a bride is very difficult nowadays.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Arjun Kumar
Re: There's general consensus
by Arjun Kumar on Oct 21, 2014 11:28 AM

Is this why you are still unmarried?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Muhammed
Re: Re: There's general consensus
by Muhammed on Oct 21, 2014 12:03 PM
Yes

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Somdev Guha
Re: Re: Re: There's general consensus
by Somdev Guha on Oct 21, 2014 12:18 PM

Man-Woman ratio is 1-0.8 ...

However, a h'girl, can be easily f00led because, if she can convert because of l0ve and come under shareea 3-tlq rule from a rationsl h'rule, what can be a better example of f00lisness ?


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Somdev Guha
Re: There's general consensus
by Somdev Guha on Oct 21, 2014 12:47 PM

And Muhammed,
Why M'gals do not reach out to H'boys ?

Do you know ?

Does the religi0n and social restriction comes for them, imposed by their men ? Who themselves enjoy the H'openness to their benefit ?


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Muhammed
Re: Re: There's general consensus
by Muhammed on Oct 21, 2014 12:51 PM
Agree with Somdev.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Arjun Kumar
All
by Arjun Kumar on Oct 21, 2014 11:08 AM  | Hide replies


All main Bollywood KhAn5 are married to "Indian" girls!

And you need more proof for L J not being pr0paganda?!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
prem moras
Re: All
by prem moras on Oct 21, 2014 12:09 PM
Hrithik Roshan married to ....its different marriage got divorced...but it counters your argument.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
chowdhary raza
Love Jihad
by chowdhary raza on Oct 21, 2014 11:01 AM  | Hide replies

Love Jihad is Propoganda only, are the Indian girls fools so they will get involved in love without knowing the Man.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Pat Thakur
Re: Love Jihad
by Pat Thakur on Oct 21, 2014 11:05 AM
Yes. Indians are fools & can be ruled over by anyone. This has been proved down the ages as we have had one alien rule after another. Even now, it's the USA, FBI, CIA, Vatican, Mecca combine that's ruling us.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Against Pseudos
Re: Love Jihad
by Against Pseudos on Oct 21, 2014 11:31 AM
Raza:

Well said... there are actually no atrocities on Indian women coz they are very smart as highlighted by you... Right?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Somdev Guha
Re: Re: Love Jihad
by Somdev Guha on Oct 21, 2014 12:08 PM

hahaha ... insisting to change the relig0n of a lover by using her feeling of l0ve ... is an example of atr0city, although cannot be caught by law !!!


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Somdev Guha
Re: Love Jihad
by Somdev Guha on Oct 21, 2014 12:06 PM
@Raza,

Large diffenences in nos. of occurrences for this phenomenon between two c0mmunitis has made it rather an one sided affair, courtesy to h'openness and therefore m'boy's easiness for befriending h'women.

The same didnot happen from other community side due to closeness of muslim culture and lack of reciprocation of the same openness for m'women !!

In a mixed society like ours, openness should be a means of living and denial of openness will disturb social harmony, as it appears to do now !!!

M's should do better to think of this !!!


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sameer
riots
by Sameer on Oct 21, 2014 10:53 AM  | Hide replies

riots possibleility if the RSS remote presses teh right modi button

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message awaiting moderator review. |  Show message
Against Pseudos
Re: riots
by Against Pseudos on Oct 21, 2014 11:32 AM
Is it? Flashback of 1947 Mahatma Gandhi buttons?


   Forward   |   Report abuse
vidwan soni
Bharat
by vidwan soni on Oct 21, 2014 10:44 AM  | Hide replies

They are just to destroy the communal harmony among all religions. They were equally responsible for making Pakistan in 1947

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Anil Gourishetty
Re: Bharat
by Anil Gourishetty on Oct 21, 2014 10:57 AM
My dear Vidwan, how can you say that RSS was equally responsible for partition in 1947? It was not at all strong and was not in a position to influence the decision. Its impact came to visible much after independence.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
chowdhary raza
Re: Re: Bharat
by chowdhary raza on Oct 21, 2014 11:08 AM
Dear Anil, try to see the positive side. U commented on the negative statement but u have not tell anything about Mr. Vidwan first statement regarding communal harmony. which is 100% correct.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: Bharat
by Against Pseudos on Oct 21, 2014 11:34 AM
You want to have communal harmony? Excellent... Then you are thinking along the same lines RSS thinks

   Forward   |   Report abuse
vidwan soni
Re: Bharat
by vidwan soni on Oct 21, 2014 11:14 AM
I meant to say that along with Muslim League, they were equal in spreading riots. See Tamas film by Bhisham Sahni.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Bharat
by Against Pseudos on Oct 21, 2014 11:33 AM
Sony TV:

The man in-charge (just like Modi was in 2002) was a gentleman called as Mahatma Gandhi... Please accuse him as much as you want..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Ashish Sharma
Re: Re: Bharat
by Ashish Sharma on Oct 21, 2014 12:04 PM
Everyone was communal when the nation was divided. And bhisham sahni only presented one view of the story as the other views were either edited or banned.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Bharat
by Against Pseudos on Oct 21, 2014 11:32 AM
Sony TV:

Mahatma Gandhi was responsible along with Nehru for making Pakistan? Well said...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
G Krishnan
Re: Bharat
by G Krishnan on Oct 21, 2014 11:48 AM
In which way. Are they seeking special privileges for 'HIndus'. Have they sought persecution of other communities. They are propagating their views in a democratic way. Others have been countering it with all the pwoer vested with them. After 67 years of Independence a star from their parivar has taken the reigns in Delhi. Their influence for creation of Pakistan was next to nil. The partition was a natural consequence of centuries of mistrust between communities and in my opinion served the best interest of the people. Imagine the condition if we would have been together with kind of feelings running deep between us. They feel that there is a threat and they are placing it before the people. It is for us to take it or leave it.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 109 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Write a message