Rahul should be hanged..how he dare to born in influential political family whose members lost their lives in politics by resisting communal politics??..how dare he talks about sincere politics in this manipulation world?? .. he can also spare media and some social sites users from twisting the world to mock him and spend time in other worthy stuff.. dynasty politics reserved only for only bjp..Munde’s in Maharashtra, Scindia in Rajastan and many more as well allies Thakary’s, Choutala’’s and Badal’s
Re: Re: HANG RAHUL
by Against Pseudos on Oct 21, 2014 10:48 AM
If I get 35 Trillion dollars, and I give 23 Trillion dollars to you, then you will be richer than Mark Zuckerberg... Right?
Re: HANG RAHUL
by nitin kalariya on Oct 20, 2014 05:09 PM
Nobody is asking about why rahul is contesting election. When you talk about dynasty it is about making Rahul the PM candidate when there are other senior Leaders in Congress. in BJP just because your daughter/son of politician you cannot become CM/PM you have to come through the hierarchy.
Re: Re: HANG RAHUL
by SureshKumar CV on Oct 20, 2014 05:27 PM
What I feel is that we should not waste our time on such trivial issues. In fact, if someone is capable and really accepts responsibility, then there is no harm in entrusting the responsibility ... whether that of PM or CM or Minister or MP or MLA .... that should not be an issue... when in politics, we must concentrate on welfare of people and must strive to carry out our responsibilities and GIVE RESULTS... its no use commenting what others have done but say WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO DO TO MAKE LIFE BETTER FOR THE SOCIETY/COUNTRY.. That's whats important I guess...all other things are useless and for wastage of time only I guess
Like Fakuchand's "victory" in 2014 election in 2014 at Baroda and Varanasi in the wake of Paid media news and power of black money in the electronic and print media blitz ushered by RSS and BJP with Fake Hindutava tadka and INC(Indian National congress) luke-warm campaign did the "wave"n "tsunami" of Fakuchand Muddy Modi and Tadipar Amitbhai, did the magic of 31% vote share Sarkar.
WILL DEVENDRA PHANDNAVIS BE MAHARASHTRA's KEJERIWAL by sudhakar sk (View MyPage) on Oct 20, 2014 03:23 PM
BJP-RSS claim that they will sweep Maharashtra Assembly can to naught with yesterdays result.
They-RSS-BJP will have to beg and lick the Shiv Sena or scheming and most corrupt Sharad Pawar lead NCP.
Assembly election of result of Haryana and Maharashtra has once again proved that RSS and BJP survives only with split and spoils.
The so called wave and tsunami are sheer big backwas.
Secular vote got split into such an extent it is an "cake-walk" for thisw "mass-miurderer and Tadipar" lead party RSS-BJP and its Sarkar at New Delhi.
It is sad even election commissioners admission of paid news menece by especially RSS and BJP; as well role of balck money in RSS-BJP media campaign.
Re: WAS IT SYMPATHY OR A FEAR OF RSS GOONDA's.
by rishi on Oct 20, 2014 05:31 PM
Are you from so-called Indian National Congress party that could not find even one competent Indian politician in its hundred-plus years of existence to lead it and everyone from the peon to the president ended up doing 'jee hujoori' to an Italian housewife ! ! ! No wonder the upright honest aspiring young electorate of India threw the traitors out first in loksabha elections-2014 and now in Haryana and Maharashtra.
Re: WAS IT SYMPATHY OR A FEAR OF RSS GOONDA's.
by Vineet Nagar on Oct 20, 2014 05:48 PM
Sudhakar is jihadi under a fake name. Ignore this paki - he should go back to his p11gland that his fa5her Jinna created.
rahul claims PM post only becoz his dad/grandma/grand-grandpa were PMs. Modi's dad was a chaiwala and Modi became PM only due to hard work. sonia became Cong Pres only becoz of her husband. Amit Shah became BJP pres only due to hard work.
Re: Re: Dynasty vs democracy
by mera bharat mahan on Oct 20, 2014 05:18 PM
100 percent correct...spread hatred, show them dream of hindu rashtra and win votes...communal politics is even worst than dynasty politics
Re: Re: Re: Dynasty vs democracy
by mani M K on Oct 20, 2014 05:33 PM
and we have seen secular politics in 1947 where 20 lacs hindus lost their life. what happned in noakhali as anybody asking ? what is minority population in pakistan today which was 40% in 1947
Re: Re: Dynasty vs democracy
by Poly Tics on Oct 20, 2014 05:30 PM
Donot cry. it is the fact that congress party is dying and you will see a glorious death in the next election, that will be end of Nehru dynasty in India.
Re: Prtam aaan milo
by vidwan soni on Oct 20, 2014 05:09 PM
Won because of the sympathy vote, but can do nothing worthwhile. Maharashtrians are very sentimental/emotional! Merits are generally ignored in our country of ignorants.
Re: family
by manoj on Oct 20, 2014 03:19 PM
rahul claims PM post only becoz his dad/grandma/grand-grandpa were PMs. Modi's dad was a chaiwala and Modi became PM only due to hard work. sonia became Cong Pres only becoz of her husband. Amit Shah became BJP pres only due to hard work.
Re: Re: family
by SureshKumar CV on Oct 20, 2014 01:41 PM
There you are... its democracy and any eligible individual can contest elections as per our constitution... and any individual has option to chose the profession he wants (I mean legal ones).... so, better do not indulge in tarnishing the image of someone else when you are also doing the same thing .... be perfect to gain respect
Re: Re: Re: family
by Against Pseudos on Oct 20, 2014 01:46 PM
SureshKumar CV:
ROTFLMAO..... Now you started confusing Dynasty with Democracy? First you were confusing Dynasty with Family... :) High time you bought a dictionary.. :)
Re: Re: Re: family
by manoj on Oct 20, 2014 03:16 PM
rahul claims PM post becoz his dad/grandma/grandgrandpa were PMs. Modi's dad was a chaiwala and Modi became PM due to hard work.
sonia became Cong Pres becoz of her husband. Amit Shah became BJP pres due to hard work
Re: Question
by nishant gadkari on Oct 20, 2014 03:04 PM
DYNASTY OR NO DYNASTY IMPORTANT IS PEOPLE WELFARE. OTHERS SONS AND DAUGHTERS LIKE OF COMMON MAN ALSO FOLLOW THE PATH OF THERE ANCESTOR AS THEY GET BETTER SUPPORT THERE. IMPORTANT IS SOME YOUNGSTER FOLLOW IT IN THE NAME OF CARREER AND SOME FOLLOW IT AS THEY ARE NOT GOOD ELSWHERE. RARELY ONE HAS QUALITY OF SKILLED POLITICIAN . SO DYNASTY POLITICS IS GOING FOR ITS OWN DEATH AS THESE YOUNGSTERS HAVE JOINED FOR CAREER AND NOT FOR PEOPLE EVEN SONIA GANDHI OR RAHUL GANDHI TOO WITHOUT PURPOSE AND STAND
Re: Question
by manoj on Oct 20, 2014 03:12 PM
IF MUNDE SISTERS BECOME PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA AND BJP PRESIDENT, BJP WILL BECOME DYNASTY LIKE CONGRESS
Re: Question
by Dony Worry on Oct 20, 2014 05:19 PM
They are no different with this shameless act of dynastic politics. I am a BJP supporter but this is really shameful!
Re: Question
by SureshKumar CV on Oct 20, 2014 09:42 AM
This is just one example... there are many more... in this election itself...Please enlighten the people of India about this first.
Re: Re: Question
by Against Pseudos on Oct 20, 2014 10:14 AM
SureshKumar CV:
When Pritam's son's son's daughter's son comes into politics, THEN talk about Dynasty.... Meanwhile go understand the meaning of Dynasty if you can....
Re: Re: Re: Question
by SureshKumar CV on Oct 20, 2014 01:32 PM
If you are talking about Congress, it had heads other than someone from Nehru family in the first instance. Being oppose to Congress, you call that party dynasty. Now, when similar thing is done in other parties, including BJP, you tend to hide it.
Being an Indian, I only look forward to the well being of the nation.. not of any single party/individual etc. etc. So, I just commented when I saw BJP preach something and practically do something else. That's it.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Question
by manoj on Oct 20, 2014 03:12 PM
IF MUNDE SISTERS BECOME PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA AND BJP PRESIDENT, BJP WILL BECOME DYNASTY LIKE CONGRESS
Re: Re: Re: Question
by AK on Oct 20, 2014 02:29 PM
Dont try to be over smart. This is the problem with the Bhakts - blind support. Anyone being given a seat purely based on who his/her father/mother is, is the beginning point of dynasty in democracy. Seeing the profile of candidates across the party lines, Maharashtra seems to be a fertile ground for that. Shiv sena did that, and if BJP continues to give seats the way it is giving now, we may soon see some son/daughter of dead BJP leader becoming Maha CM. If BJP wants to retain its uniqueness in Indian democracy it has to arrest this trend.
Re: Re: Question
by SureshKumar CV on Oct 20, 2014 01:36 PM
Just see the height of arrogance... talking as if he is the most intelligent and complete individual in this universe
Re: Re: Question
by SureshKumar CV on Oct 20, 2014 01:37 PM
Just see the height of arrogance... talking as if he is the most intelligent and complete individual in this universe
Re: Re: Re: Question
by Against Pseudos on Oct 20, 2014 01:45 PM
SureshKumar CV:
When I read your messages, it is YOU who appears to be talking as if she is the most intelligent and complete individual in this universe... Whilst in reality you don't even know what Dynasty means... and when pointed out, you start abusing me.. :)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Question
by SureshKumar CV on Oct 20, 2014 01:56 PM
I didn't mean to abuse you and if you feel I did it, it was not intentional and I withdraw all such words.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Question
by SureshKumar CV on Oct 20, 2014 02:07 PM
If the individual is capable of doing something, let him do that... instead of tarnishing image of others, one must concentrate in his own responsibilities and win hearts by being responsible ... not by tarnishing image of others... that's what I wanted to say
Re: Re: Question
by AK on Oct 20, 2014 02:43 PM
How do you even know that 'nobody cried dynasty" at that time? Did you stiff thru the newspapers of those times? Or perhaps if someone did cry, a Bhakth like you would have countered it saying "When Indira's son's son's daughter's son comes into politics, THEN talk about Dynasty.... Meanwhile go understand the meaning of Dynasty if you can...." refusing to see that its actually the beginning point for that to happen! Because thats what the Bhakts always do, and on a long term they always end up harming their own party with such blind support - thats exactly what happened with Cong.
