They are seeing only quantity of riots not quality like if you see in gujrat riots continued for long time may be year or so but were not intense while in Bombay actual riots happened for 3-4 months but were intense its not job of gujrati people to do riots politician must have hired people from some other states for that to keep the riots for long time but with less intensity so we have to also consider intensity of riots rather then number of counts
the different districts is published....................and a number of middle class commoners (particularly those from North India) bray out words such as religion, communal, hyndu, muxlim, muxlim, communal, religion, hyndu...........................................................majority, minority, hyndu, muxlim........................................................communal, minority, hyndu...........................ad infinitum!
Pea brained middle class commoners!
The fact that religious riots constitute just a small proportion of all riots in many parts of the country (especially in places such as Kerala) is completely beyond comprehension for these oafs!
Re: truth
by Kathir Krishnamurthi on Jun 20, 2014 09:04 PM | Hide message
it was never practiced as your mythical propaganda from an rss pamphlet teaches you...
In your statistics you may be highlighting the numbers not may be the riots, it may police cases registered on atrocities or some other causes. Riots occurred in Assam, UP, Gujarat, etc. but there is no such riots occurred in other parts of the country. So your article and finding is baseless. Better don't post like this articles which lead into peoples misconception about riots. Political rivalries are crimes but not meant as riots. It may be big or small. Don't fuel it by mean minded articles. Research is good but positiveness is far better than negativeness and apply effort for goodness not to reflect the bad and wrong sides to the people.
