Re: UAe&OmanTeerorists are Slave of China,Russia&Israel!
by GulfCooperation Cancer on Jun 08, 2014 09:19 PM
UAe,Oman Teerorist try toKILL NarendraModi but fail to do so since 2001, now UAe,Oman Teerorist Sucking leakingPenis of Narendra Modi. 911Ali SalimAlOwais&SultanOmranAlowais are hiding in the Bee’ah & Sharjah East Coast and Central Region Municipalities As CleaningHead. UAe&OmanTeerorists begging to acquire NuclearBOMB from KOREANCompanies in UaeBarkha Area. Opposition political parties said: UAEs&Omans Terrorst got Billions&Billions of dollars in European Banks like EgyptiMubarak,IraqiSaddam&Gaddafi !!
Re: china needs to address trade imbalance
by Siv on Jun 09, 2014 08:03 AM
they (Chinese) give Indians (very) cheap goods in return which congress could not provide because all the capital was exported to Swiss banks and Singaporean banks.
China is taking only in last 60 years now with new Govt. it is our take policy only with China.During UPA regime china was agressive & it is agressive with all its neighbour.
Re: No give take policy with China
by Siv on Jun 09, 2014 08:06 AM
china is NOT the problem. It is our traitor leaders who were the problem who looted Indians and sent capital abroad to Italy, UK, Singapore and Switzerland!
The BJP and its NDA Alliance to deal with its counter part of China or Japan or America when our Hon'ble PM will visit these countries - it is requested that Give and Take policies in the business should be adopted with Japan and America, but, whereas with china - China has already established their business in India globally but during the (print this message)regime of UPA 1 & 2 useless government has not done any things like Give and Take policy with China counterpart, due to their weaknesses, the inflation and economic reforms have gone down in India. But, the people of India having lot of aspirations, enthusiasms and expectations by BJP that they will always think about the development of India in all aspects.
Indian diplomacy should assert for a delicate balance by moving closer to Japan and strengthening relationship with China in trade and to resolve border disputes outside Nehru's Panchasheel framework, to counter China's growing coziness with Pakistan and it's bullying tactics w.r.t Tibet.
Re: Delicate balance with Japan and China
by Ramesh on Jun 08, 2014 03:37 AM
Free Suggestion,
Like your name, for most of us here are doing nothing different!
China-Japan relationship is far stronger than India-Japan. Japanese have invested over $500 billion in China. For decades since Indira Gandhi visit to Japan, India has been seeking to improve tie with Japan, but they have been thinking differently. It is only now PM Abe wants to be friendly to India. Whether this is a long term change in Japan, or just a freakish PM attitude is not clear yet.
I think, India needs to first stress on SAARC relationship to cope with China designs.
Re: Re: Delicate balance with Japan and China
by Ramesh on Jun 08, 2014 03:41 AM
Before 1949, China used to be Far Eastern nation, along with Korea and Japan. If India regains the trust of its Muslim neighbors to ensure strategic cooperation, the expansionist designs of China can be stopped in its track.
Re: Re: Re: Delicate balance with Japan and China
by Ramesh on Jun 08, 2014 03:42 AM
Japan option is another possibility, but not an option yet, and probably less workable in the long run.
Re: Re: Delicate balance with Japan and China
by Ravi on Jun 08, 2014 08:33 AM
Ramesh, You are illiterate.
Japan China relationship is equally worse as India Pak. The investment you are highlighting here is what the Japan-China media interprets as trase war.
Talk to any Japanese national and you will be shocked to hear the reality.
Re: Re: Re: Delicate balance with Japan and China
by Ramesh on Jun 08, 2014 06:23 PM
Ravi,
Yes, off late China-Japan relationship is in top spin, not clear whether it is a long term change or not.
The old Japanese occupation of Manchuria, Rape of Nanking, etc have been revived for boycott of Japanese cars and goods. But both nations have mature diplomacy and can easily resolve those, if there is political intent.
Japan has strong nuclear relationship with China, while Japan cut off relationship with India when after 1998 N-tests. They have been opposing India in NSG and other talks.
After Nixon-Mao talks, Japan also built very strong ties which China, despite most difficult war history; the intensity levels of present disputes is quite low and amenable to reconciliation. And, I think they ought to reconcile, enable Koreas to unite, and reduce tensions in the region.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Delicate balance with Japan and China
by Ramesh on Jun 08, 2014 06:30 PM
Also, Ravi,
I have been favoring closer India-Japan relationship ever since Abe become PM for the first time and visited Kolkata to see the legacy of Subhash Ch Bose. Diplomacy begins with sentiments but can not be built on sentiments, it need strong foundation of law, values and interests, both strategic and economic.
Forget panchshil it was for seven years for trade we made Tibet part of china for five years something it w ass laps, now Tibet should become free trade none without china
Re: stop china in india
by aam aadmy on Jun 08, 2014 12:18 PM
We dont need china. We need Taiwan, Malaysia,Singapore, Indonesia, Myanmar Australia etc to do business. They are being occupied by china in the name of Greater China (ROC). India must have to explore the problems in this places and make free from china
