Romas are the monad people living in mostly eastern part of Europe and other European countries. Their ancestors were indians taken as slaves by the invading musleem armies and sold in the bazaars of arab countries. This is not told in out history books because that is against so called secularism. If Timoor himself did not write in his book that his army kelled more than lakh hendus in Delhi, out sickular govt would have never let that come out. Our destorted history to please the minority vote bank will be corrected now so that out future generations will know the true history. why should minorities feel bad about this. why would they identify themselves with the Ghoris and Ghajani's or Aurangzeb's who were invaders and keller of humans including other musleem kingdoms.
Re: Does our history books talk about Romas .?
by Kathir Krishnamurthi on Aug 29, 2014 02:33 AM
Please enlighten about Gypsies in Europe.. Also about molten lead poured into the ears of Indians listening to Vedas...
They were interested to obtain Hindu women in their harems to get the numbers. However, they strictly their stopped women to reach Hindu's (This happens even now). Later, Aurangjeb was very agresive !!! Other kings like Tipu, Haidar in Karnataka, the king of Hyderabad, etc were forciibbly doing c0nverrtion and abbduction of women !!!!
As a result of their combined effort, Undivided India before Ishlaameec invasion with 0% moseleem was replaced by 35% Mooselaem in 1700 AD ... had British delayed by a few years, India would have been an Isslomic country !!!!
In our history the prominently shows Mughal and Pathan era with huge glorification. No mention about Islamic horibble genocides, 130 mn killed, mn's of women forcibly sent to harems !!!
Our glorious past with Gupta / Mourya / Chalukya and many ... are shortened down !!!
True history must come out !!!
We Indians have the right to know what was our true past !!!
It is high time we Bhartiyas (Indians) stop learning our own language from other countries. For example Yoga went from Bharat to America, they reaped its benefits and now Barrack Obama says that Yoga does not belong just to Bharat. Just as what they did with Basmati rice, soon they will patent Yoga as well as Saffronisation immaterial whatever one names it. It has been widely accepted today by them (NASA) that Sanskrit is the next generation and probably the ultimate language of Technological developments and Software. Thanks, they yet do not know that Sanskrit is also all about spirituality. Germans have taken interest in Sanskrit long back. Today the intellectual class world around praises the Bhartiya values and culture. There is no way to peace in the world unless the teachings of Ramayana and Mahabharat are understood globally.
Saffron is the colour of sun, indicates enlightened approach i.e. changing as per circumstances, India had been secular from the last 3000 years due to its diversity. All religion whosoever has come has been respected here. Saffronisation will give up British era and bring new light.
And of course science and technology. So let some people contests endlessly about history. While it is good to know your history and discuss about it, those in position of power and responsibility should focus on development - like how from being 131 in respect of per capita income, in the world our rank improves to two digits over the next five years and may be single digit- among the top ten by 2030.
How can any evidence become outdated unless contradicted by other evidences?
So, what did you find out about the history of the horse in the sub continent?
And horse remains have been found at multiple strata?
Will you say with references whether they have been found in the bronze age strata as well?
So, when did the iron age begin in India?
The horse arrived in India before it did in Mesopotamia?
What are your references for saying this?
Are the horse remains you refer to really those of horses or of asxses or the thing called Onagers (half asxses)?
What about the main evidence that bursts the carefully built up and labouriously sustained myth that the Vedic age subsumes the Indus valley civilisation - the Indus valley one was entirely urban in character (completely so and in this at least, there is no difference of opinion between historians of various hues) while the Vedas (all the four ones) have only pastoral/rural societies pictured in them?
And raxcial intermingling?
Read what Specer Wells has written in his The journey of Man; a genetic odyssey (2002). Read Michael D Pertaglia in his The evolution and history of humans in South Asia (2007).
All these works (and several others too) derive their references from several large sample studies of the Mitochondrial DNA (maternal DNA) and genome sequencing of hundreds of Indian sub-communities and compare them with those of other populations worldwide.
Re: Sri, in response to your post
by piri on Jul 28, 2014 02:44 PM
As other works - both by Indian as well as western scholars - argue, migrations in batches of various sizes into the sub-continent from the north west (and from other directions also though to lesser extents) were routine for tens of thousands of years. Broadly, the negritos from the African coast came first, followed by Australoids, then by numerous groups from the Central Asian regions who are often called the Indo-Europeans.
Linguistic evidence points to continuous assimilation in Indian languages.
By the way, I am neither a crusader (do they exist now?) nor an evangelist!
