Highly opportunist politician like Mulayam, Lalu, Paswan etc., he is product of NDA regime-came in limelight due to their obligations, today siding with minority. Nothing wrong to side with them, but to speak against majority and become prejudiced is not secular face. He must be removed. We do not need any non-secular. All regional parties-majority of them is on the basis of caste, religion, region or language, and are non secular.
Re: Nitish
by VajpayeeKaulsex on Sep 23, 2013 08:30 PM
jdu isnot eigional banai it is rssbjp which is communal and anyway remmebr that time is now set fro natilisatioon of all wealth - land and all resources of nation to be redistributed
enough of corrupt communal manuwadis
go to your rss or anywhere but remember now 77% poor Indian will take back what was snatched from them by manuwadis -- corrupt communal middle classes
Each and Every politician wants to be PM. NAMO wherever he is going talking against congress and not a single word what is his plant to bring India to Shine. Secondly NK talking about seculirism. Why any one is speaking about the countries progress instead of critizing to congress. Yes there are corruption in the world but during Indira rigim there is pokaran but NDA regim it is mashed every one are forgot this. Now NAMO talking only congress critisim and he is less bother about the middle class common man what exactly they want and what are his future plan to give our vote to BJP otherwise congress is better than other parties. what you said about my views
For Nitish definition of secularism changes with time. Earlier he had told MMS that he (MMS) need not teach him definition of secularism. But now he has sided with the most corrupt and communal Cong
