Even after 66 years of independance ,12 five year plan had over what is the real status of tribal India now?.Every union budget millions of rupees alloted to improve the lifestyle of the tribal people by providing schools ,homes.sanitary facilities roads ,how many of them avail these facilities as off.People asking how naxel movement (Govt called extremizm) had become strong in indai?.All the fund alloted to these people had gone to the pocket of bureacrats,politician,etc..... Now people realized that we arec cheated by the goverment and fight with weapons against goverment is the onlt solutions to get our rights in Indai.Do the congress party can run away from this ??.the congress party and its leaders are the mail culprit for the bad conditions of the tribal people in India.the goverment has to conduct a surway and to disclose the real status of the tribal people in Indsai especially W bengal,odisha,bihar madya pradesh and chathisgad.If this tendencu continues ,the scenario will not change ,poor people will become more poor a few will become multi holders.Like reliance .
There is nothing new in this; it was clear game plan of RSS to send externed criminal like Amitbhai Shah who did the Godhara Kand to repeat it in UP.
With Fekkoo stand-by Amit Shah's job became easy at Muzzafarnagar!.
Moreover,now that paid news in whether print media or electronic media is an matter of done thing; as frustrated News Barons will write everything against the UPA II, with an intent to "kill" UPA III.
Re: AMITBHAI WAS SENT TO UP WITH A MISSION-RSS GSAME PLAN
by Raja on Sep 19, 2013 03:58 PM
Why is congress afraid to bring presidents rule in UP. This is a match fixing between congress, SP and BSP. Isnt it funny that SP is ruling UP and Cong/BSP is ruling at the centre
Re: AMITBHAI WAS SENT TO UP WITH A MISSION-RSS GSAME PLAN
by bigben bigben on Sep 20, 2013 02:33 AM
Anybody who uses the word feku is a paid congie stooge. Therefore your words are meaningless.
Re: UP Communial Riots
by jatin joshipura on Sep 19, 2013 03:53 PM
what were BJP MLAs doing in Jat Mahapnachyat on 7th September? why did BSP MP Kadir Rana called Panchayat on 30th August after Friday Prayers?
Re: Re: UP Communial Riots
by Raja on Sep 19, 2013 03:54 PM
Why is congress afraid to bring presidents rule in UP. This is a match fixing between congress, SP and BSP. Isnt it funny that SP is ruling UP and Cong/BSP is ruling at the centre
Re: Re: Re: UP Communial Riots
by Raja on Sep 19, 2013 03:57 PM
What was the govt machinery doing when meetings were held by opposing forces. Is it not the accusation always on Modi. So how are SP, BSP and congress different. One can only say that for a pseudo secularist like joshi what Modi did was wrong and what SP BSP congress does is correct
Re: Re: Re: UP Communial Riots
by jatin joshipura on Sep 19, 2013 03:59 PM
was president rule imposed after 2002 Gujarat riots? BJP MLAs gave provocative and inflammatory speeches on 7th September during Jat Mahapanchayat and one of them circulated fake CDs of muslim mob killing jat boys sachin and gaurav
Re: Re: Re: Re: UP Communial Riots
by Raja on Sep 19, 2013 04:03 PM
That is what BJP and Modi was accused of doing. So tell me how is congress/ SP and BSP different. PS I am not a supporter of Modi. Why dont you see the program on AAj TAK news channel. What stopped Akhilesh govt from arresting the culprits for eight days
Re: UP Communial Riots
by sudhakar sk on Sep 19, 2013 04:00 PM
There is nothing new in this; it was clear game plan of RSS to send externed criminal like Amitbhai Shah who did the Godhara Kand to repeat it in UP.
With Fekkoo stand-by Amit Shah's job became easy at Muzzafarnagar!.
Moreover,now that paid news in whether print media or electronic media is an matter of done thing; as frustrated News Barons will write everything against the UPA II, with an intent to "kill" UPA III.
Re: Re: UP Communial Riots
by jatin joshipura on Sep 19, 2013 04:05 PM
why did muslims call Panchayat on 30th August after Friday Prayer despite 144 being in force and during which local BSP MP Kadir Rana and others (including leaders of both SP and Congress) made provocative speeches? did RSS and Amit Shah ask them to do that?
Re: Riots
by Raja on Sep 19, 2013 03:48 PM
Why is congress afraid to bring presidents rule in UP. This is a match fixing between congress, SP and BSP. Isnt it funny that SP is ruling UP and Cong/BSP is ruling at the centre
Re: Riots
by NATARAJ PAUL on Sep 19, 2013 03:58 PM
Communal riots will keep taking place till VOTES are cornered /given on caste and religion basis. We need DEVELOPMENT , GROWTH , PERFORMING ECONOMY. SEE GUJRAT, TRY MODI.
Re: Re: Riots
by Avik Bose on Sep 19, 2013 09:36 PM
Local people say the Jolly canal massacre turned into the communal riots of Muzaffarnagar, in which officially 45 persons returning from Maha-panchayat have been killed. But local people say the number is much higher. Eyewitnesses say after the mass killings using AK-47 rifles, the attackers dumped the bodies in the canal, which meets the Ganges river in adjoining Haridwar district. So far, 7 bodies have been fished out. The villagers accused the local administration of not acting swiftly.The police allowed the attackers to flee, some said. “The district administration has not made any effort to track the missing persons or find the bodies. Even the water flow in the canal was not controlled; it was deliberately increased to sweep away the dumped bodies."
As long as UP is a big state, it will be a descissive and Powerfull state in National Politics. With such a importance this state has, all wants to have a big pie from it. All this is costing peoples lives.
Only solution is to split UP into smaller states so that it looses its prominance in National Politics.
UP roots are the result of muslim voter appeasement gone horribly wrong. Both congress and SP are directly responsible for the Hindu revolt against making them second class citizens in our own country. Azam, farooki, rashid alvi etc have made a mess of UP which was a good state a few years back.
Re: Naked Muslim Appeasement
by jatin joshipura on Sep 19, 2013 03:23 PM | Hide message
it was in good condition in 1992 when a mosque was demolished by hindu fanatics led by Advani, MM Joshi, Uma Bharti, Ashok Singhal, Vishnu Hari Dalmiya despite assurances given by Kalyan Singh to High Court that it would be protected
It is a shame that even after partition in 1947 lessons have not been learnt by Congress party as well as by a lot of unscrupulous elements in India that the people remaining in the country named India should try to unite together and foster a National spirit. But the individuals avarice for power has allowed them to let loose the same policies of the pre-independent India viz. divide and rule and are holding the country to ransom.
Re: Not a masjid
by jatin joshipura on Sep 19, 2013 02:45 PM
just because mosque was built by babar does not make it illegal. As far as whether it was built after demolishing an existing temple, the matter is pending in Supreme Court and one should wait for the verdict of the supreme court
Re: Re: Not a masjid
by linus on Sep 19, 2013 02:52 PM
It was made by a Invader...Hence it is illegal.. why do we have a doubt on that ? After all they are building structures on forcefully occupied lands
Re: Re: Re: Not a masjid
by jatin joshipura on Sep 19, 2013 02:55 PM
Aryans too were invaders so all their temples too should be considered 'illegal' and if we go by your logic all structures built by moguls including Taj mahal become illegal
Re: Re: Re: Re: Not a masjid
by pawan aggarwal on Sep 19, 2013 03:22 PM
dear its better if you convert your name as Jishan/ suleman/ or any other name suited to you.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Not a masjid
by jatin joshipura on Sep 19, 2013 03:26 PM
sorry to disappoint you but i have no intention of changing my name or religion.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Not a masjid
by Rakesh Pandit on Sep 19, 2013 03:28 PM
Agreed.actually joshipura of Ahmedabad should have been a Nagar community person. But this chap is definetely a non hindu.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Not a masjid
by jatin joshipura on Sep 19, 2013 03:36 PM
Pandit i chat with my real name and surname and i do not have to hide my identity since i am a free citizen of this country and i do not have to assume a fake identity to express my views since freedom of expression is guaranteed by the constitution
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Not a masjid
by Raja on Sep 19, 2013 03:53 PM
The supreme court is going to decide weather the division of Babri masjid as was decided by high court is valid or not. Allahabad high court has already ordered division of disputed land between the aggrieved parties.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Not a masjid
by jatin joshipura on Sep 19, 2013 04:02 PM
Supreme court does not have to abide by verdict passed by High Courts. The order given by high court, both the fundamental issue and division of the dispute land, have been challenged in supreme court. Never knew that High Court verdict should be considered final hahaha
Re: Re: Not a masjid
by G Krishnan on Sep 19, 2013 03:04 PM
Supreme court verdict is not awaited for establishing whether a temple was existing at that place are not. Archeological excavations have already established that and the entire country knows it. The present government doesn.t have the guts to reveal and admit officially.
Re: Re: Re: Not a masjid
by jatin joshipura on Sep 19, 2013 03:08 PM | Hide message
Archeological evidence have been submitted to Supreme Court and it will decide whether those evidence prove conclusively that there existed a temple at the place where babri mosque was built by babur. This precisely is the matter pending before supreme court. please do some research
Let Mullayam realise it that his gimmick of flaring up communal clashes by not allowing administration to act stands exposed and all these foul play will bring back Maya baen strongly.The hapless law and order situation and Akhileshs failure to act as C,M, will cost Mullayam dearly and let him not day dream and not count muslim to be fools.By doing so he is offering better show in a platter to BJPand BSP.
