When there verses from a particular religion inscribed in the walls of his house even after socalled reconversion, how come the court says he does not belong to that religion? It is not just that there is evidence of his following the religion by which he was dalit, but he has kept proof that he had converted to a religion foregoing his dalit status and continues to hold that belief.
One place you say "Its your misconception that Islam religionabusing othersreligion, dear friend its your mind set only because have very poor knowledge about the Islamic History."
Another place you say "Definitely piglets like u must bestoned tilldeath"
Every one can express his opinion. And by the way this 'golden' is abusinghinduism since 2006 with abusiveandlibellious language.
Re: Re: WE CARE FOR EACH OTHER
by mmrehman on Nov 01, 2013 08:14 PM
but this is even before Independence that time there were no such piglets. is not your comments supports some ideology
Re: WE CARE FOR EACH OTHER
by Shyam Sunder on Nov 02, 2013 10:22 AM
Sticks are for self protection from surrounding dangers. That does not kill innocent lots.
In our country it is the judiciary that tells us what is right in religious matters; whether an atheist can refrain from folding his hands during a school prayer, whether a Jehovah Witness can refuse to sing the national anthem, whether a Muslim can boycott Vande Mataram or whether a government school can introduce Suryanamaskar. There are court judgements on all these issues.
It is clear that he was insincere both while converting and reconverting. He must have calculated the benefit of converting and later, when a greater benefit beckoned came back to the fold.
Re: what a pity..
by Vijay Chauhan on Nov 01, 2013 02:58 PM
When, in the name of religion, the hypocrites, start atrocities and violate human rights, courts need to come to picture. A bold step indeed. At least one person has dared to go against the autocracy. Great step by an individual; regardless whether converting Christianity to Hinduism or vice versa.
Re: Re: what a pity..
by mmrehman on Nov 01, 2013 07:07 PM
you mind your words, do not cross laxman Rekha and don't dare to say go to Pakistan. This is our land by the rights.
Re: Re: Re: what a pity..
by on Nov 01, 2013 07:29 PM
Agree on your second sentence. but can the u guys stop abusing others religions? tolerance does not mean abusing majority community and cry foul when hit back. v had enough of this, mind it.
Re: Re: Re: Re: what a pity..
by mmrehman on Nov 01, 2013 07:43 PM
Its your misconception that Islam religion abusing others religion, dear friend its your mind set only because have very poor knowledge about the Islamic History.
Re: Re: Re: what a pity..
by linus on Nov 01, 2013 07:36 PM
But the fact remains that Pak was formed for Muslims. Wonder why you guys stayed back ? You guys would have been very happy there and there would have no majority minority issue at all.
Re: Re: Re: Re: what a pity..
by mmrehman on Nov 01, 2013 07:47 PM
Sorry the whole world is for every body and every religion not only pak, it does not mean that some body will harass some one in the name of minority or majority.
Re: what a pity..
by on Nov 01, 2013 07:33 PM
I hope this brazenness is the result of minority appeasement by successive so-called secularist parties. I am sure if anyone abuses islam like this he wud be stoned to death. Time for Modi/BJP and stop filthy piglets like u.
