Discussion Board

Ishrat case: CBI names 11 Gujarat cops as witnesses


Total 87 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4   Older >
kareem
doubt
by kareem on Jul 13, 2013 08:41 PM  | Hide replies

First CBi should investigate that whther they were Innocents or not. If they were gehadies..I Strongly believe that action was correct.. otherwise very bad.. real brutal..as a human being I am telling this .Please religion mad fellows don't reply..

    Forward  |  Report abuse
True Indian
Re: doubt
by True Indian on Jul 14, 2013 03:31 AM
Whether they were really jihadis or not is a separate issue. The current issue is whether the encounter is real or fake. Law, which represents the opinion of majority of this country, doesn't permit fake encounters, even if they were jihadis.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
True Indian
Re: doubt
by True Indian on Jul 14, 2013 03:32 AM
Whether they were really jihadis or not is a separate issue. The current issue is whether the encounter is real or fake. Law, which represents the opinion of majority of this country, doesn't permit fake encounters, even if they were jihadis.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
vidwan soni
Re: Re: doubt
by vidwan soni on Jul 14, 2013 01:51 PM
True Indian is true. Should all SUSPECTS be killed in fake encounters? Modi Lovers can not give true judgments!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
True Indian
Re: Re: Re: doubt
by True Indian on Jul 14, 2013 02:20 PM
There is a good reason as to why Modi lovers cannot give true judgement. Mature and bright minds have created the law and courts for right seasons. It is lame duck thinking to believe that justice can be imparted by doing things outside the law. Courts are there and processes are in place so that true and complete facts can be brought to the notice of the court. Based on that, smart people can pass judgement as to whether the so-called jihadis are indeed terrorists or not. This so-called justice can be lopsided and irreversible damage could happen to people if things are decided outside the court. Also, if things are being decided outside the court, the aggreived party can resort to its own ways of implementing justice. Another important aspect to this outside-court justice is that people like police in the above case can have their personal selfish agenda - sometimes a political one and that can work as a motivation to give justice outside the court. Mature minds realize that it has got nothing to do with justice but it is only to fulfill their own personal agenda - which is, promotions and rewards for the police and political growth for Modi in the above case.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
True Indian
Re: Re: Re: Re: doubt
by True Indian on Jul 14, 2013 02:56 PM
Another significant implication of giving justice outside the court is that the truth will never come out in public. As we have seen in the above case, we will never know whether Ishrat was a terrorist or not. Since the Police and Govt has committed grave atrocities on Ishrat by killing her and others, they have complete vested interest in proving that Ishrat is indeed a terrorist and there is no other angle to that story, i.e, she is not innocent and police and govt. doesn't have a personal agenda here. In this kind of atmosphere, we, the general public will never know the truth. The police is supposed to act as an instrument for the court to seek truth. But, once it takes a certain position and takes irreversible action as above i.e, killing Ishrat, it becomes a party by itself to the whole episode. And, it would go to any extent to claim that what they have done is correct and Ishrat indeed was a terrorist and killed in true encounter. The police should never become a party and get itself involved deeply and take an extremely rigid stance. Once it does so, there is no scope for getting any justice or no scope for us public to know the truth. Anyway, the police has done grave atrocities on Ishrat by killing her in fake encounter and now they are all out to prove that they are on the right side. We do not expect any better output from them. The guilty policemen should be punished so that in future at least public would not be deprieved of knowing the truth.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Rouge
Re: Re: doubt
by Rouge on Jul 15, 2013 12:08 PM
U r C hu t ia...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
True Indian
Re: Re: Re: doubt
by True Indian on Jul 17, 2013 12:02 AM
U r very brave and smart. We all know it.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
B Chander
ishrat case
by B Chander on Jul 13, 2013 10:07 AM  | Hide replies

congress will destroy brotherhood among Hindus and Muslims for the sake of vote bank

    Forward  |  Report abuse
vidwan soni
Re: ishrat case
by vidwan soni on Jul 13, 2013 02:19 PM
You think atrocities be allowed on any community (may be Hindu or Muslim)to suppoprt your wrong views?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Om Shanti
..
by Om Shanti on Jul 13, 2013 08:31 AM  | Hide replies

It is shameful_for all us who call ourselves_as Hindus_because after having 80% population we cannot install a hindu_government in the country and we continue to be abused_by ruling party and Vatican_media.We are prepared to accept that we must pay for Haj_subsidy through our income tax and minorities_have first right to resources_! We_hindus elect sickular_parties to power so that we get_all kind of insults_and_abuses for the next five years.We hindus_are a bunch_of_impotents!

Ishrat_Jahan Bihar_Ki_Beti
Dawood_bhai India_Ka_beta
Osama_jee is our_idol

We are slaves_of fake G_family.Long live_sickularism.

When in majority,we are sickular_!
When in minority,we are homeless in our own home(Kashmiri_pundits).



    Forward  |  Report abuse
Rouge
Re: ..
by Rouge on Jul 15, 2013 12:10 PM
Exactly true.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Suresh Tenvillage
Is it the only encounter India has met since Independence??
by Suresh Tenvillage on Jul 12, 2013 04:18 PM  | Hide replies

Why so much coverage to this one incident, because Sonia and congress want to intricate mr. modi and his entire police force so as to get muslim sympathy.

It is well known to all the top echelons of judiciary, Congress bureau of investigation (CBI), IB etc., still they are wasting their valuable time on this case.

we should not scapegoat the police in this case, which will have cascading effect on the overall police functioning in future.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Abraham Philip
Re: Is it the only encounter India has met since Independence??
by Abraham Philip on Jul 12, 2013 07:08 PM
FROM YOUR IT IS VERY CLEAR U R A HINDU FUNDAMANTIST SUPPORTING MODI FOR HIS WRONG DOING



   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
True Indian
Re: Is it the only encounter India has met since Independence??
by True Indian on Jul 14, 2013 03:45 AM
This incident is receiving wide coverage for different reasons although police atrocities in various forms have been a norm almost everywhere in India. Whatever be the reasons, this is a good opportunity to set a correct precedent for the future. Convict all criminals wearing khaki. It will send a message, loud and clear to all the thugs wearing police uniforms that even they have to follow the law of the land. Also, this incident would bring into light the demonic nature of the police force. We need to convict more and more thugs in police uniforms in order to make these goondas toe the line of the law.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Ranjan Thirumalai
Too much
by Ranjan Thirumalai on Jul 12, 2013 07:08 AM  | Hide replies

Too much propaganda is made in isharat case which is one in so many thousands happening in India which CBI is stretch too far to satisfy c'gress political crookedness.Honest people expect this will be exposed in the legal battle.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
vidwan soni
Re: Too much
by vidwan soni on Jul 13, 2013 02:26 PM
Nonsense. Why are you afraid of truth?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
vidwan soni
Re: Too much
by vidwan soni on Jul 13, 2013 02:26 PM
Nonsense. Why are you afraid of truth?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Dulal Das
Repeating History?
by Dulal Das on Jul 11, 2013 10:56 PM  | Hide replies

Rediff was flooded with pro-Mamata views. Just see the news 'Anyone opposing Mamata is arrested or tagged a Maoist'in the same page of today's rediff news. We do not want History should repeat. Better learn from past.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
as lal
congress is putting pressure on policemen
by as lal on Jul 11, 2013 06:59 PM

hoping some one will utter MODIJI,S name i any context.Then immediately they will arrest MODIJI and hope to win the election. Desparation of congress is disgusting and harmful to nation

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Vishvaksenah
Gandhian investigation
by Vishvaksenah on Jul 11, 2013 04:18 PM  | Hide replies

Let there be Gandhian investigation.
This country was founded single handedly by the great work of one individual- Beloved Bapuji- who is the father of present day India.

Any act in this country should strictly follow the ideals of beloved Bapuji- father of present day India.

CVI or IB or NIA or SIT can investigate .
But they should bear in mind that the investigation should be Gandhian in nature.
Let me explain briefly


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Vishvaksenah
Re: Gandhian investigation
by Vishvaksenah on Jul 11, 2013 04:19 PM

On 23.12.1926, Secularist Abdoul_Rasheed did a very secular act.

Our beloved Bapuji- father of present day India condoned this act and pleaded for Rasheied's clemency.

To know what this secular act, please google- 23.12.1926 – Abdul Rashid

The CBI investigation of Ishrat_Case is truly Gandhian. Let the BodhGaya investigation be also Gandhian in nature.

Then we can have the triumph of secularism !
Long live Gandhigiri !


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 87 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4   Older >
Write a message