IF RAHUL WORKS ON HIS OWN , WITHOUT BEING PARTIAL , HE WILL DO AN EXCELLENT JOB FOR THE COUNTRY. IN CASE HE LISTENS TO HIS BUNCH OF ----- & IS NOT ALLOWED TO TAKE BOLD DECISIONS , THAT MAY BE THE END OF THE DYNASTIC RULE AS WELL AS THE END OF CONGRESS RAVI MEHROTRA
Re: RAHUL
by siva kumar on Jan 21, 2013 08:16 AM
Has he anytime in the past shown that he has his own brain. He talks in most immatured way. He has proven that he is not equal to even Akhlish Yadav. Not even to one-time chaaywala Modi.
Let me tell you one thing, we have seen our self rule right from Nehru to Manmohan Singh. Nehru was the man for just initiation, Indira, with her intellectual quality in some areas might have ruled our country for a longer period, but still i think, she was not innovative and courageous to take radical changes. Coming to Rajiv Gandhi, he was inexperienced in governing the Mass India. The rest were all short lived rulers, we cannot judge them. Now coming to Mr. P.V. Narasimha Rao, i think, he was a dynamic, efficient and far sighted states man. Because in his period only, he was the only one person who had taken all decisions for improvement of our Economic Structure (with the help of Mr. Manmohan Singh), the Brain of Economy. In my view the liberalization of 1991 industrial policy had paved many ways for my countries growth. In a gist i would like to say that under the leadership of P.V. Narasimha Rao, Mr. Manmohan Singh was the Nation Builder. Mr. Rao encouraged Manmohan Singh to take good decisions. In my view those are the only two heroes who had brought our nation to this place. The rest are all Short sited states men. If you ask me my decision, i would rather tell you that, just give full powers to Mr. Manmohan Singh as Prime Minister and Mr. Abdul Kalam as President (without intervention of Congress), then our nation will be one of the powerful nations in the world. Readers kindly go through the facts. If you agree, kindly forward this message to all.
That is the message that Congress sends to the nation.
* Sushil Shinde failed miserably as Power Minister after Coalgate happened, and he got a promotion to Home Minister. * Salman Khurshid's NGO ran into financial irregularities while he was a Law Minister, and he got a promotion to Minister of External Affairs. * Raul Vinci oversaw the elections in Bihar, UP and Gujarat and earned disastrous results, and now he got promoted as Vice President of Congress.
Re: What Rahul Gandhi's elevation means for the Congress?
by sankarisarveswar on Jan 21, 2013 01:19 AM
beginning for a tragic ending for Indira congress and wrap up by Mino
In the course of rahul's first address to Congress Members said that members should either perform OR make way for Performers. Perhaps he should have asked this to himself first. Can he explain his performances to the Nation? The Common Man believes, and rightly so, that he has made it to the top for his "Gandhi" surname. Indeed this also sends a negative signal to the Society in general and Government Offices in particular, where nepotism will be the main criterion for promotion and appointment.
