Re: Not seen the last of this
by aryan on Feb 20, 2013 05:57 PM
let them celebrate..but they r not understanding they are digging their own grave..now..the act begins..wait n see
Re: Not seen the last of this
by Ranjan Thirumalai on Feb 20, 2013 10:28 PM
You are cheating T.nadu so long.SC has hit the nail on your head.Justice will and should prevail.
Re: Re: Re: K'kata
by aryan on Feb 20, 2013 05:51 PM
srikrishnan are u not ashame of urself..most of the tamilians are eating in ur villages because of working in bangalore..ask them..they will tell u what is karnataka and what is bangalore
Re: Re: Re: Re: K'kata
by Srikrishnan V on Feb 20, 2013 06:01 PM
to answer one point, too many shettys/bunts in mumbai bars and sending money to native village. i am sure there are enough karnataka people in TN. all i am saying is before getting emotional with numbers given in the notification, how many of us here can understand what these mean? we are not water experts, if you are please clarify. for example, what happens when rains are low? how about higher than normal rainfall?
Re: K'kata
by Srikrishnan V on Feb 20, 2013 05:51 PM
if you had retained JJ in mysore, maybe the outcome would have been different. but who on these forums understand the numbers? how many dam experts here?
Re: Re: Re: Sheer injustice to karnataka
by sankar narayanan on Feb 20, 2013 05:41 PM
dear brothers- dont use abusing language - and dear moderator please look after it
As Tamil Nadu is a State with regional party at the helm of affairs and Central Government needing the support of either of the parties from TN i.e., DMK and AIADK (Karunanidhi or Jayalalitha) in forming a Government at the Centre, this award of the Tribunal is an act of balancing the political interest and nothing else. How can you put in numbers i.e., so much TMC of water for a state when you cant predict the amount of rain every year. And moreover, TN being the Lower Delta Region, it receives water from rain which falls below the dams in Karnataka i.e., below Mysore region, which cannot be stored anyway by Karnataka and also the rain which falls in TN every year. If the tribunal had to be fair, it could have fixed the percentage of water to be utilized by each State and not a fixed amount of TMCs. And secondly, the cauvery region in Karnataka does not receive any water from any upper region as there is no connecting the cauvery to any other river from either Karnataka or any other state. So, once the water is flown out of our dams in Karnataka, we cant get any water for drinking purpose, if not irrigation. So how can this be fair. As can be seen, 419 TMC against 516 TMC is given to TN and only 270 TMC as against 465 TMC is given to Karnataka. How can this be a balancing act or a fair order. The Tribunal was comprised of politically influenced people who would listen to the Central Government and not give an order on the correct facts put forth before it by the States.
Re: Balancing Act true...but an act of balancing political intere
by sudhir thakur on Feb 20, 2013 05:35 PM
Very good study done y Mr. Rajesh. I agree with him that injustice is being done to Karnatak.
Re: Re: Re: Balancing Act true...but an act of balancing politica
by aryan on Feb 20, 2013 05:47 PM
how can supreme court give judgement ..when civil cases are pending on the same issue..is it because election is nearing
Re: Re: Re: Re: Balancing Act true...but an act of balancing poli
by Ranjan Thirumalai on Feb 20, 2013 10:34 PM
You cannot be dodging the law and courts by filing cases and there should be a limit and now SC has done justice to TNadu of its millions of years of right on cauvery water.Your cultivation is of recent times and not old.
Re: Balancing Act true...but an act of balancing political intere
by Srikrishnan V on Feb 20, 2013 06:33 PM
mr. rajesh, good reasoning by you as compared to others. as you seem knowledgable, and I am most certainly not, maybe you can answer the doubts. what percentage of river flows over each state? also, let us assume that requirement of TN is X. now, since there is loss through evaporation, flow dynamics all due to natural causes, certainly something more than X has to be released from source. Do you know this extra quantity, or at least how it can be estimated? it could turn out that though 400 something units of water is released, in reality maybe a very small fraction actually reaches the farmers down the river.
