Discussion Board

Have 'strong' evidence against Modi in riot case: Teesta


Total 155 messages Pages | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
abrahm yankee
Start
by abrahm yankee on Feb 20, 2013 06:22 PM

Congress paid started barking

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Amit Sharma
I have strong evidence
by Amit Sharma on Feb 20, 2013 02:53 PM  | Hide replies

I have strong evidence of Teesta being financed by a US citizen whom I emailed but never got any answer.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Ranveer Kumar
Conquered
by Ranveer Kumar on Feb 20, 2013 11:23 AM  | Hide replies



T S has finally conquered the aftermath of her menopause and is back in action with fictitious evidence of Modi's involvement in the 2002 riots!

For the umpteenth time, it wasn't Modi but ordinary Gujarati people who rioted during that time!

If we are going to hold the CM of a state responsible for every crime that is committed in his or her state during his or her tenure, then let us first start with states ruled by the Congress party!

It is not Modi who is the villain! It is collectively all the Gujarati people living everywhere all over the world!

Why single Modi out for 2002 riots when it was the lumpen Gujarati people who committed all the crimes during those riots?!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
SHAN BAID
Re: Conquered
by SHAN BAID on Feb 20, 2013 12:45 PM
Ranveer,i appreciate your attachment to Modi.Its natural that when you like some one too much for one reason you turn blind eye to the darker side of icon.
Its open fact that Modi was involved indirectly in the riot giving '72 hrs'free hand to 'reaction'that followed Godhra.This is acknowledged by his fans as per convenience of argument(justifying against Godhra act). Its not that riots didnt take place in the past rather this was unique in the sense that the authority who was constitutionally bound to save ,became part of 'unrule'albeit behind the doors thereby violating 'rajdharma'.'action-reaction' chain is infinite there fore unjustifiable.But fortunately the indian society has elements who dont cut the corners and take on the 'populism' by righteousness and Teesta is one of them.They are constant eyesore for orthodox and fascist elemnts. The irony is that evidence agaisnt such crimes can come up only when the kulprit is suspeneded and machinary is available to offer evidence. This is basic requirement of justice but alas missing. Although, the uncontrolled riot itself speaks volumes about 'admin ability'but that itself is not justified reason for remain insulated from prosecution

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Savitha Patil
Re: Re: Conquered
by Savitha Patil on Feb 20, 2013 01:43 PM
Teesta is back in action on whose behest, this needs to be probed, also her links with some of the so called NGOs & their funding, hope she does not make a spectacle of herself thistime....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
SHAN BAID
Re: Re: Re: Conquered
by SHAN BAID on Feb 20, 2013 01:57 PM
The real spectacle can be had if Modi is removed from position and natural justice be prevailed

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Savitha Patil
Re: Re: Re: Re: Conquered
by Savitha Patil on Feb 20, 2013 02:13 PM
Just because some people do not like Mr Modi do not give them the right to start anti modi cottage industry, why no action on all other riots in this country start with 84 riots, else move on....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
abrahm yankee
Re: Re: Conquered
by abrahm yankee on Feb 20, 2013 06:35 PM
Pak ki shan Baid
Started barking

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
samcarto
Re: Re: Conquered
by samcarto on Feb 20, 2013 07:58 PM
Why is the same logic not being used against Rajiv in the Anti Sikh riots? If prime accused of Godhra can be deemed innocent by the court, what is wrong in Modi being deemed innocent by the SC appointed SIT? That too in a scenario where the central government is inimical to him

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Aftab Alam
yawn
by Aftab Alam on Feb 20, 2013 11:09 AM

.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
rishiraj kumar
what is your view
by rishiraj kumar on Feb 19, 2013 09:40 PM

what is your view and evidances for Aasam, Kashmir, And burning of Train In Godhra?
You must would be in toilet that time.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
desiiii
joke
by desiiii on Feb 19, 2013 05:17 PM  | Hide replies

delhi is the capital of country and its a city with large number of police force and certainly not like the size of gujarat yet not a single rioter was shot dead unlike gujarat where 300 died in police firing

    Forward  |  Report abuse
rishiraj kumar
Re: joke
by rishiraj kumar on Feb 19, 2013 09:46 PM
True,
Who is this lady to keep memory for gujrat only. I want to know about her view on decrease in non-muslim population in any muslim dominated place, even including Kashmir, Pakistan, Bangladesh? Why can not everyone fix responsibility and speak true. Modi is not angainst anyone but public voice is tough to ignore so he is leading. There is only one Leader in India whom all any abuse but he react only for matters not for meaningless things.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Bharat Bhushan
For The Record
by Bharat Bhushan on Feb 19, 2013 05:07 PM  | Hide replies

The government told parliament that 790 Muslims and 254 Hindus were killed, 223 more people reported missing and another 2,500 injured.
In other words, was this as one-sided a riot, as the secular brigade would have you believe?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
samcarto
Re: For The Record
by samcarto on Feb 20, 2013 07:56 PM
Moreover, most of this 254 hindus died in police firing.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
rahul malhotra
uneducated person
by rahul malhotra on Feb 19, 2013 04:06 PM  | Hide replies

Modi an illiterate person cannot be a pm of india... Support AAP .. keriwal ji jindabad

    Forward  |  Report abuse
samcarto
Re: uneducated person
by samcarto on Feb 20, 2013 08:01 PM
This is a weak argument. We have see what a highly literate PM can do to the country's administration in the last ten years.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Ramesh Shah
Modi vs Teesta.
by Ramesh Shah on Feb 19, 2013 03:06 PM  | Hide replies

Nothing is concrete against Modi in this article.
All are vague accusations.
Ramesh Shah

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Farooq Khan
Re: Modi vs Teesta.
by Farooq Khan on Feb 19, 2013 04:42 PM
If somebody cuts your mother right infront of you, will you say nobody have concrete evidence to prove it..
My mother is not killed.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
aleem Baig
Re: Re: Modi vs Teesta.
by aleem Baig on Feb 19, 2013 06:23 PM
no, Ramesh will ask him to stop and will call first witness and then he will permit to the killer to kill.....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
adrgdr adrgdr
Re: Re: Re: Modi vs Teesta.
by adrgdr adrgdr on Feb 20, 2013 09:16 AM
Yes Both Farooq and Aleem baig are right. When urMother is burnt on a train ailve, we should not keep quite. We should killl all thoseBastardPigs who did it.
Now Thats whatModhi did. Whats wrong in it?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Nol I
Re: Re: Re: Re: Modi vs Teesta.
by Nol I on Feb 20, 2013 01:34 PM
The wrong is that Modi's mother was not part of the train carnage, which could, by extension, have been a reason for "free hand to reaction". He, on the other hand, being the CM of a democratic state, was duty bound to find and punish the perpetrators of the train carnage. He commissioned one crime and omitted to find the perpetrators in the other. And that is wrong.

Reasons like "No more riots", "Other states' status", "Kashmiri pandits", "great governance" etc. etc. are not going to erase that wrong, considering that he refuses to apologise for the same.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
abrahm yankee
Re: Re: Modi vs Teesta.
by abrahm yankee on Feb 20, 2013 06:37 PM
Madarsi brain washed What about killing by your ancestors for years ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
samcarto
Re: Re: Modi vs Teesta.
by samcarto on Feb 20, 2013 08:04 PM
Being sentimental about Mother is not a part of judicial process. Then how should one take the Prime Accused of Godhra train burning being acquitted by courts?? The question is if Modi did that. There is no evidence that has in any way implicated him.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 155 messages Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message