Nearly four lakh Kashmiri Pandits were hounded out of their homes due to this turmoil thousands were killed. Some put the present figure of the number of exiled Kashmiri Pandits at 7.5 lakh. No commission or probe has focused on ethnic cleansing and the genocide of minority Pandits, which led to their exodus from the valley. Moreover, the persecutors are roaming freely in P O Kashmir
and congress both have hopes on concessions to the voter, where as BJPs Modi wants to deliver same product at low prices through positive governance. He has inspired his people through relentless hard work with one goal i.e. progress. This is visible in Guj. which no one wants to recognize. Thats how his opponent cheats himself. He is not the image of someones weakness, but a genuine worker who plays genuine and non divisive politics. For him poor are poor. His poor does not belong to a section. His detractors are not ignorant but rigid and do not want come out of dreamy world. UNDER MODI WHOLE OF INDIA CAN PROGRESS AS ONE UNIT.
Sir Badri Narayan, I disagree with your view points, I feel most of the Thinkers or Intellectuals(Branded by media) are not able to understand/digest what is happening in and around politics of India, Intellectuals/thinkers must always connect to the people mode and that basis they need analyze not based on what there ideologies . You mention so many good points Rahul Gandhi is doing in congress, that's welcome change for india, Same way can't you accept the Modi(BJP) and AAP party doing good things. Why are you saying daily facing issue as transactional issue(have not herd small small drop of water makes streams, small small streams makes lakes .... final big ocean, same theory applies in economics, if we remove small corruption every day life and secondly if we get basic facilities , over head cost of manufacture gets distributes) and also we want leader who can galvanism people confidence by connecting with leadership capabilities and some proven track records.
Re: Sir Badri Narayan - I disagree with your view points
by SUDHIR PARASHER on Dec 22, 2013 10:27 AM
Well said! Only ideology is ECONOMY and the well fare of people. Any other issue is irrelevant in 21st century.
Re: Headgear
by nuthan adalagerenemirajaiah on Dec 22, 2013 10:30 AM
If Modi say economy plan in Gujarat model , then people object is 2002 model? or malnutrition? or untouchable?. I don't know he is the solution for all the problems. As forum writers we must not just ask the question and we must give some solution this will constructive for India and Most of the parties connected to social media. Which ever party picks up its good for India, win-win for us. End of the day our vision of India is implemented that's very important then who rules the country.
[Modi - Suggestion] He needs to balance his speech between bashing and understand people problem(Country) facing and make that as speech what he has done in Gujarat or his counter parts done in other parts of the country or going to do, it not just promise must see the feasibility.
MODI IS GOOD IN CARRYING THE MESSAGE OF BANIAS,COMMUNALISM IS THE ESSENECE OF INDIAN BANIA TO DOMINATE THE MARKET. SO MODI IS MEANT FOR IT. BUT RAHUL IS NOT CAPABLE OF CARRING SENTIMENTS OF COMMON INDIAN IN HIS LANGUAGE.SO THERE IS A SPACE FOR "AAM ADMI".MEDIA IS MOSTLY FOR INDIAN BANIAS SO RAHUL IS DESCRIBED AS ALLERGIC TO MEDIA.THAT'S IT
Prof. Badrinarayan observation that electronic media is allergic to Rahul Gandhi is somewhat strange. I have found the English media promoting may I call it marketing Rahul Gandhi day in and day out. Congress party works like a Govt. It appoints its leaders and dismisses them when it likes. It is single family operation since the days of Indira Gandhi. Rahul Gandhi is also a product of the same way of working. Whatever leadership is being attributed to him is mostly media creation.
Re: Modi is orig
by sanjoy basu on Dec 21, 2013 10:57 PM
Yes, he is not byproduct of a puppet.
Puppet is byproduct of Puppeteer. Puppet wants gaddi/chair at all costs, wants to show he was PM, will now be remembered as person who shamed the position.
