IT IS A SABOTAGE AGAINST EX-SC-JUDGE MR.A.K.GANGULLY, HE IS A HONEST & FAIR IN PROFESSION, HE HANDLED NOTORIOUS 2G SCAM & AWARDED TO NATION A STRONG JUDGEMENT TO PUNISHED THE CULPRITS, HE HAMMERED TO OUR CORRUPT POLITICAL SYSTEM & TRIED TO BREAK CORRUPT SYNDICATE, NATION SHOULD NOT FORGET HIS HONESTY, CORRUPT POLITICAL LEADERS MAY TRIED TO SPRAY BLACK PAINT ON MR.GANGULY, WHY THY THE SAID INTERN OWN SELF IS A LAW GRADUATE, SO SHE KNOWS IPC'S ALL THE SECTION HE IS NOT A INNOCENT URBAN GIRL, WHY SHE SLEEP SUCH A LONG TIME TO BRING THIS ISSUE,MAY HER VEST PERSONAL MOTIVATION,SEXUAL HARASSMENT SECTION OF IPC SHOULD VALID WITHIN A TIME FRAME OTHER WISE FURTHER IT WILL BE BADLY UTILIZE LIKE IPC'S SECTION 498A, ANY INSULTING TO MR. GANGULY WILL BE EFFECT ON FAIRNESS JUDICIARY & DEMORALIZED THE HONEST JUDGES. NARK O-TEST SHOULD BE DONE OF INTERN THOSE HAVE ALLEGED
IT IS A SABOTAGE AGAINST EX-SC-JUDGE MR.A.K.GANGULLY, HE IS A HONEST & FAIR IN PROFESSION, HE HANDLED NOTORIOUS 2G SCAM & AWARDED TO NATION A STRONG JUDGEMENT TO PUNISHED THE CULPRITS, HE HAMMERED TO OUR CORRUPT POLITICAL SYSTEM & TRIED TO BREAK CORRUPT SYNDICATE, NATION SHOULD NOT FORGET HIS HONESTY, CORRUPT POLITICAL LEADERS MAY TRIED TO SPRAY BLACK PAINT ON MR.GANGULY, WHY THY THE SAID INTERN OWN SELF IS A LAW GRADUATE, SO SHE KNOWS IPC'S ALL THE SECTION HE IS NOT A INNOCENT URBAN GIRL, WHY SHE SLEEP SUCH A LONG TIME TO BRING THIS ISSUE,MAY HER VEST PERSONAL MOTIVATION,SEXUAL HARASSMENT SECTION OF IPC SHOULD VALID WITHIN A TIME FRAME OTHER WISE FURTHER IT WILL BE BADLY UTILIZE LIKE IPC'S SECTION 498A, ANY INSULTING TO MR. GANGULY WILL BE EFFECT ON FAIRNESS JUDICIARY & DEMORALIZED THE HONEST JUDGES. NARK O-TEST SHOULD BE DONE OF INTERN THOSE HAVE ALLEGED
ANY INSULTING TO MR. GANGULY WILL BE EFFECT ON FAIRNESS JUDICIARY & DEMORALIZED THE HONEST JUDGES. NARKO-TEST SHOULD BE DONE OF INTERN THOSE HAVE ALLEGED.IPC'S SECTION OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT TO BE DEFINE IN TIME FRAME FOR ALLEGATION, OTHER WISE IT WILL BE MISUSED LIKE SECTION 498A, ALL THE FEMALE NOT FAIR LIKE ALL THE GLITTERS ARE NOT GOLD.
The Supreme Court panel has NOT indicted Mr Ganguly. It has merely said that the intern's statements suggest there is a prima facie case against Mr Ganguly. At the same time, the panel has neither dismissed nor vouched for the veracity of the allegations.
My only question is WHY DID SHE AGREE TO GO TO HIS HOTEL ROOM AFTER 9PM ON X'MAS EVE? FOR A LECTURE / TRAINING ON LAW MATTERS OR IS SHE A POLITICAL POINT!!
Re: AK GANGULY
by arahaman on Dec 06, 2013 05:33 PM
crime was confirmed by none other than committee made by SC (panel of judge).we have extreme double standard when discuss matter with judge and judicial system. people in democratic country like us can not criticize the judgement given by any court of law other wise he will be charged with contempt of court! i think he should face the truth.we are living in a country of Buddha, Gandhi.
Reaction of the Supreme Court is not just baffling but also suspicious. If my post tantamount to contempt, yes, that is what I have.
It was a known fact when the matter surfaced, that the Judge was retired and the Intern was not an Intern at the point of the alleged incident.
Knowing these facts before hand, what was the purpose of the convening the committee?
If the SC had already decided before hand that it will not act if the findings are adverse and also do not entertain any complaints about former judges, then the sole purpose of the Committee is to find if the allegation is false.
In the first place, when the intern was not an intern at the point of the incident and when the incident occured not in the premises of SC or any of its offices and timings, then where is the point of treating it as binding on them to look into the matter?
Now look at the wordings of the Committee's findings: "an unwelcome verbal/non-verbal advances of sexuaal nature"
Why is the committee chose the word non-verbal? why cant they be direct; was it physical, was it showing objectionable content on an electronic or mobile device, or exposing himself before her?
Was it not a nuanced word calling it "an unwelcome" Why didnt they use some other appropriate word given the objectional intention of the Judge.
At this frate, no on e would be willing to become a judge, an election commissioner, an ips officer or even a petty govt official in west bengal (oif u k now trhe latest: the case of the Publications Deptt Registrar Biusmay Roy)
Now the BJP has also fallen in the TMC trap and called for his resignation. Clearly, BJP wants TMC's support post 2014 Elections and is indulging in political foreplay with TMC
Re: Justice Ganguly
by Vijay Sahani on Dec 06, 2013 03:04 PM
Even if they realize what's up, it is not in their interest to go against the tide, especially when everyone is in election mode.