Sqjnjay Jha is the worst of all the congress spokemen I have everseen and heard. He is the most irritating person who never give any straight and specific reply to the specific questions. He always talk on irrelevant subject and always think that he doing propoganda of his prty. He has got the bad habit of constantly interferring other penalists when they get their chance to speak.He think he is smart but he is a jocker and makes himself a laughing stock amongst ythe other penalists and the pople who watch and hear him. Why Arnab Goswamy the finest TV anchor invite him and tolerate Sanjay Jhas utter nonsense on his panel.Indian Merchant Chamber is a very reputed institution and they should not bring down their standard lower by calling this jocker as a speaker on any subjuect which he dont know.The opposition parties should thank congress for having such spokemen which make their task easier in the coming election as the people who are with congress will definitely move away from congress after watching and hearing Sanjay Jha.
Re: PITY
by telenganadaku on Aug 24, 2013 05:04 PM
INVITING JHA FOR ANY DEBATE IS NOTHING BUT DIABOLICAL NONSENSE, THIS GUY IS ON OFFICIAL PAYROLL OF CONGRESS & VINOD MEHTA IS ON UNOFFICIAL PAYROLL.
Re: PITY
by P S SHAH on Aug 25, 2013 03:09 PM
He is like a dull student who has not prepared for examination at all and sent by his parents forcefully to attend the exam and write whatever he know and feel in the answer paper.
Re: I think the author was beaten by Sanjay Jha.....
by Aron Que Marr on Aug 24, 2013 12:00 AM
POOR JHA NEVER GETS ANY VALID POINT TO DEFEND !!! SO HE IS FORCED TO BLABBER ENDLESSLY ABOUT NOTHING
there were some records kept as guidelines for the new serving officer by his predecessor. as per those: if you see a jha and a snake approaching you at the same time, kill jha first.
I listen debate and observe that Sanjay lacks knowledge and get arrogant when opposition ask question.For example:this govt did not do any thing for the last 9 years in the field of road,power,manufacturing and health and education.The GDP sustained for 4-5 years on the work done by NDA in all these fields and having huge foreign reserve.And lastly the GDP fall down to 4-5%,where as in 2004-05,the GDP increased to 9%.Sanjay always give wrong argument in debate.
Mr Jha is a programmed robot of the Congress party.He could not say any thing original. IMC was not wrong in inviting Mr Jha but it was wrong on the part of the Congress party to have permitted Mr Jha to accept the invitation.He has made a fool of himself alright.But we should thank him for giving us an opportunity to find out how hollow the ruling party is.Praise for Dr MMS,Mr PC and Mr Ahluwalia is rubbing salt in our wound. The alert audience was not a pack of morons.They knew their onion
BJP followers mindset typically that of India shining campaign, rambo act of Modi, Gujarat developed phenomenon...
BJP spokespersons get more time but end up yelling and throwing fake data, including quoting Vajpayee govt whom India rejected despite their tall claims on development.
Sincerity matters. People of India do not accept empty noise and faking claims...
Re: Unlike BJP Spokesperson Sanjay Speaks Logically
by ramaswamy sunderrajan on Aug 23, 2013 05:56 PM
You have correctly said as to why people of India do not accept Congress's claims
The author Ganesh is conveniently ignoring facts to pay homage to the anti-govt mood in the country> Examples; 1."Golden Quad is identified with Vajpayi"?So what, Vajpayi only completed a small part of it while the major work has come in thelast 6 years. 2.GDP - Whetehr ganesh likes it or not, fact is that average GDP growht in 9 years of UPA is 7.6% while under 5 years of NDA was just 5%. Even this year, the UPA is expected ot do 5.5% which is more than the average under NDA! 3. RTI- Its is a fact UPa gave us RTI.And is only the UPA opposing bringing political parties under it, even the NDa and all parties are doing it. WHY/For the simple reason that this information is anyway given to the election commission and can be availed by RTI from the elction commission! 4.On SC order on criminals: Again NDA, UPA all are opposing this , not jus the UPA. So why blame them alone?UPA has proposed another model where any cases on politicans are undr fast track courts so they are quick results and they can be barred or seek elections as the case maybe.this is becoz if you ban somebody, he may take 30 yrs to prove himself innocent as the courts moveso slowly!
Each of the Accusations of ganesh can be easily rebutted with reason.
The problem with us is that we never base our arguments on reason only on sentoment and that is why we invariably elect the wrong people.
The problem is not with the politicians, it starts with us
Re: Convenient misrepresentation
by arungopal agarwal on Aug 23, 2013 05:45 PM
Problem lies with the total division in society due to vote bank politics, Congress in order to retain power divided the whole country in religion, caste, region, language, which are spreading hate in between poors and riches too now. Hate is the key of politics.As such whole confusion. No faith with anyone.
I listen him on news channel. He is very irritate person. Every time he tell a lie. He is loyal for Congress not for nation. He force me to change the Chanel.
Re: IRRITATIVE PERSON
by Inzy Bhai on Aug 23, 2013 05:48 PM
Sorry no one can beat Modi when it comes to lying. If Modi knew even a modicum of economics he would never repeat the lie of Rs 1 = $ 1 in 1947. What a humbug of a man.
Re: Re: IRRITATIVE PERSON
by Amit on Aug 23, 2013 05:57 PM
Read the article mad-rasa monkey ...its IMC member who is also quoting the same thing in 1947 1 INR = $1............due to corruption and mismanagement and loot the economy went down keepingthe poor poorer
Re: Re: IRRITATIVE PERSON
by ramaswamy sunderrajan on Aug 23, 2013 06:17 PM
I am afraid Modi seems to be right about a rupee being on par with the dollar in 1967.I remember the period when Rs 5 would get you a dollar.
Re: Re: Re: IRRITATIVE PERSON
by ramaswamy sunderrajan on Aug 23, 2013 06:18 PM
Sorry it was 1947 and not 1967 as mentioned in my earlier post.Regret the error