The futility of Higgs Boson as the creator of mass and gravity shall soon be apparent. It was a 'discovery' by CERN as belaboured as the discovery of faster than light neutrinoes. Gravity was there from the very beginning and not after a lapse of time. Big Bang too begs greater understanding, which the current state of affairs in physics cannot provide. I had been working on it and a day back my patent application to the USPTO regarding gravity modulation has been published.
Re: I'd call it the beginning of real physics
by Sridhar Rao on Jul 14, 2012 09:36 AM
as said gravity was there before big bang (eternal) it is the property of space that give mass to the matter not the particles that are inside the proton
Re: Higgs Boson
by Indian First on Jul 15, 2012 11:16 AM
Yes that is life,dude, crooked weterners and western media treat hindus and indians only a slaves and untouchables!
Re: west always has this tendency
by Indian First on Jul 15, 2012 11:17 AM
Excellent comment, dude, that is the perverted western media and wetsren media and even slavish indian media and intellectuals too!
unless mankind knows everything about the universe. As far as LHC is concerned, they will be busy for decades researching dark matter, dark energy, miniature black holes etc. Author's frustration is that of a lay-man. Science is difficult.
Re: Physics will not stop
by sam raj on Jul 14, 2012 12:31 AM
Physics is all about providing explanation / theory about the existing cause and effects of incidents which is already happening in the world or universe
Srinivasan also does not understand the uncertainty principle - it is not about what *we* can "know" about particles, it is about the nature of the particles themselves. Heisenberg's principle says that for non-commuting observables (like different components of angular momentum, or position and momentum) the particle does not *have* fixed values for both items in the pair. Also, how can Heisenberg's uncertainty principle be a barrier to "finding the true building blocks of matter" when it is already included in the current standard model theory?
Re: Heisenberg
by secret on Jul 14, 2012 01:59 AM
True. In Quantum physics world, everything can't be observed. A lot is inferred from their behavior. It may be too difficult to observe something that lasts for a billionth of a second.
Re: Heisenberg
by nobel on Jul 14, 2012 03:27 AM
Isnt it the main barrier as it is very difficult to observe and measure simultaneously. And thats the whole point of using the LHC trying to get around the problem of measuring particles with out actually effecting them.
Re: here we go...
by Vedprakash Sharma on Jul 13, 2012 10:37 PM
And also nuts liek you to counter it even before the discussion begins! It is precisely because of slaves liek you that hate themselves, Indian is still not a super power!
Re: Re: here we go...
by Jai Neo on Jul 13, 2012 11:19 PM
Do you believe p0ppycock about Genesis, Adam & Eve, Manu, Noah, etc, etc!
Darwin, evolution, DNA, Genetics and Geological science already hold many answers!
As geneticist and Nobel Prize winner James Watson (DNA fame) said "The biggest advantage to believing in G0d is- you don't have to understand anything, no physics, no biology, no chemistry."
Re: here we go...
by Jai Neo on Jul 13, 2012 11:21 PM
Acceptance without proof is the fundamental characteristic of any religion and Rejection without proof is the fundamental characteristic of Science. Religion arose as a means of explanation of natural phenomena at a time when no other explanation of the origin of natural phenomena had been ascertained. Religion is based on FEAR-fear of death & afterlife, fear of pain & sorrow, fear of Nature's fury!
Re: Re: here we go...
by vir singh on Jul 14, 2012 01:52 AM
such thoughts about god justified themselves during the social evolution where science was the posterboy. do not forget that science restricts itself to tangiables, hence its science of measurables or conjectures or models. how do you explain the fact that a cell is more than the sum of organic molecules, how can one explain the direction of evolution, why cant u have a cocktail of chemicals that transform into a living cell, can we have a DNA getting formed inside a flask containing the neucltides even accidentaly, what constitutes the consciousness,cognition of a organism etc. science fails to account for well documented paranormal behaviours.
Re: Re: here we go...
by vir singh on Jul 14, 2012 01:54 AM
such thoughts about god justified themselves during the social evolution where science was the posterboy. do not forget that science restricts itself to tangiables, hence its science of measurables or conjectures or models. how do you explain the fact that a cell is more than the sum of organic molecules, how can one explain the direction of evolution, why cant u have a cocktail of chemicals that transform into a living cell, can we have a DNA getting formed inside a flask containing the neucltides even accidentaly, what constitutes the consciousness,cognition of a organism etc. science fails to account for well documented paranormal behaviours.
Re: here we go...
by desi twist on Jul 14, 2012 09:41 AM
Well there are nuts in both categories, both rationals and religious minded people. Both can be equally doctrinal. Its funny how the "nuts" who glorify science at the expense of religion or the nuts who glorify religion at the expense of science actually know very little. True saints and true scientists actually keep quiet.
Re: here we go...
by Just Curious on Jul 14, 2012 12:02 AM
I think you should first question the scientists who were ridiculing that it is just mythology and against laws of physics for hundreds of years. It is a lesson for all pseudo-scientists who criticize. Just because they don't know doesn't mean that it doesn't exists.
