Natual party for Indians..Indians should be fed up with big govt license and dynastic raj they hv back home. Indians are individualistic free people who shine when free market democracies. From a country which is ruled by the Laloo thru Rahul Gandhi bandwagon, GOP's emphasis on self reliance, national pride and dignity, a committment to fighting terror, upholding traditional time tested values that also strengthen Hindu values of family, heterosexuality, etc, Indians are a natural fit in GOP.
GOP is in death grip of Christianvadis. As a result, GOP is becoming extremely right wing. This are slippery and dangerous slopes for religious minorities. Indian Americans are greedily looking at Tax Cuts and free-market opportunities but is it worth the risk?
Re: GOP is a natural party for Indian American Christianvadis.
by arvin g on Aug 31, 2012 02:57 PM
greater risk will be 4 more years of current regime but that will be too much for u to u/s... so keep on practicing ur sickular mantra of religious minorities while ur children/grandchildren turns to izlam... u will be welcome by corrupt congress in india...
Dp not? SO WHAT. REMEMBER WHAT MANTHARA SAID AND I QUOTE IN TULASI RAM CHARIT MANAS. KOU NROPUP HOU HAME KYA HANI. CHRRI CHHADI HOU NAHI RANI. AND FOR THOSE INDIAN AMERICANS I TRANSLATE. WHETHER REPS OR DEMS BECOME RULERS HOW DOES IT HELP THEM. THEY WILL BE SUBSERVIENT ONLY NOT RULERS.
Re: GOP Natural?
by arvin g on Aug 31, 2012 02:53 PM
only the people whom dont belive in core values of america or have colonial slave mentality will be subservient to any one in US...
Re: Re: GOP Natural?
by deepak on Sep 10, 2012 02:41 AM
Indians can learn from GOP pride and dignity of the human being. The slippery populist speeches of Obama needs to be ended.
slave mentality idiots... they vote for democrats without much thought the way they vote for congress in india coz thats what media tells them and they dont have their own thinking... more than 90% indians in US wont be able to name even top leaders of democratic party forget about knowing republican leaders... and being active in politics for them means getting their pictures taken with whatever level politician...
Re: indians are basically...
by FAPS on Aug 31, 2012 12:21 PM
You are so wrong. Indians are very smart and Very active in American politics. They are not only aware about what is happening in the uUS but also India.
Re: Re: indians are basically...
by arvin g on Aug 31, 2012 02:48 PM
like i said being active in politics for them means having their pictures taken with whatever level politicians...
he bases his argument mainly on fiscal pert of it. nearly all ethnicities are fiscally conservative, and hence conservative. but that does not make them republicans. actually, obama has shown more fiscal responisibility than traditional republicans have nothwithstanding the fact that deficits have increased on his watch - mainly in view of sustaining the two wars he inherited. indian americans are not happy about the fact that the republicans dogmatically partisan and refuse to co-operate with the other side on all issues, even the fiscal cliff.
Re: dhume is not right
by arvin g on Aug 31, 2012 02:51 PM
obama has shown more fiscal responsiblity... what world do u live in or what drugs are u on... typical no brain democrat mentality...
Re: Re: dhume is not right
by shilpy on Sep 01, 2012 12:25 AM
MarketWatch — Of all the falsehoods told about President Barack Obama, the biggest whopper is the one about his reckless spending spree. As would-be president Mitt Romney tells it: “I will lead us out of this debt and spending inferno.” Almost everyone believes that Obama has presided over a massive increase in federal spending, an “inferno” of spending that threatens our jobs, our businesses and our children’s future. Even Democrats seem to think it’s true.But it didn’t happen. Although there was a big stimulus bill under Obama, federal spending is rising at the slowest pace since Dwight Eisenhower brought the Korean War to an end in the 1950s.Even hapless Herbert Hoover managed to increase spending more than Obama has.Here are the facts, according to the official government statistics:• In the 2009 fiscal year — the last of George W. Bush’s presidency — federal spending rose by 17.9% from $2.98 trillion to $3.52 trillion. Check the official numbers at the Office of Management and Budget.• In fiscal 2010 — the first budget under Obama — spending fell 1.8% to $3.46 trillion.• In fiscal 2011, spending rose 4.3% to $3.60 trillion.• In fiscal 2012, spending is set to rise 0.7% to $3.63 trillion, according to the Congressional Budget Office’s estimate of the budget that was agreed to last August.• Finally in fiscal 2013 — the final budget of Obama’s term &
