By that coin, he is an Italian first. To be specific, he is 50% Italian. His father was only half Hindu/Brahmin (at best), so he is not more than 25% Hindu/Brahmin. Jawaharlal Nehru is of Kashmiri Pandit descent, so unless the Article 370 of the Constitution is repealed, the Nehru family's 'Indianness' is questionable. Feroze Gandhi, born to a Parsi (Iranian) father, lends 25% to his genes, theoretically speaking.
So here's a person who is less than 25% 'Indian', and he harbours fantasies of becoming its Supreme Leader, and considers himself to be among its traditional elite? What a delusional idiot!
there are enough records to show that it was MK Gandhi who made firoz a parsi, MKG was against this marriage but foolish Jawaharlal allowed the trouble some marriage to be solemnised; we Indians are paying the penalty for this for the last sixty years and more V Ramanathan village rengasamudram
Re: firoz is not a parsi
by Inspector Bhende on Apr 20, 2012 09:45 AM
Rahul should inherit the remote control from SG -- that will give him better leverage than PM-ship
Gujratis are going to buy what this so called prince has to say. He is rejected in Biahar and in UP by masses. Now he will go to Gujrat with I don't know what stuff, muslims, 2002 riot, communalism. In whole of India there is anti incumbency against the congress due to price rise, inflation, petrol, diesel rates going up.
People are fed up of congress, wherever there is congress there is corruption, these guys have no respect for the country, all they work on is how they can get rich, how they can get power, India is not what it used to be, people of India have changed, and there is a strong anti incumbency against congress due to corruption, there are lot of chances this party might be ruined in coming Lok sabha elections.