Wow - most sections of the news item are missed, save where "OU" and "Nizam College" students pelted stones and damaged cars. It would be interesting to see why there were so many students who were whipped by the coppers after barging into the hostel buildings.
Strangely, even the part where it was only a select few "students" who rushed past the student leaders and attacked the police. I wouldn't be surprised if it wasn't a decoy planted by the Congress to justify a brutal suppression of a peaceful protest. Did you know the cops bodily threw one kid onto the razor tipped barricade wires? The kid needed close to a thousand stitches all over his body, from the wounds. How come the reporter never got to hear about it?
John Mohan Red is being welcomed on red carpet in the Kamma Den and the so called - paper tigers - claws of Kammas are being removed effortlessly by his smiling punches.
Re: Rousing Welcome to John Mohan Red
by Kalyan Ram on Sep 21, 2011 11:48 PM
sub regional chauvinism, and castist fanatism are the hall mark of T separatists. Fasism maoism goondagardi extortion castism drunkenness= Telangana separatism
Two Seema Andhra politicians were honestly discussing about Honesty. One said, "You know, there are hundreds of ways of making money, but only one honest way!"
The other asked, "Tell me, what is that?"
The first one yelled, "I knew, I knew, you will not know that!"
Re: Honesty
by Kalyan Ram on Sep 21, 2011 11:53 PM
Two T separatists are discussing about talent in T. One fellow remarked, SA people can build studeos, IT companies, Pharma companies, can become heroes, music directors, singers, classical dancers, beauty peagant winners, scintists, entreprenuers, sportsmen, journalists and scholars, But what about us, what are our talents, the other fellow remarked, We can produce the best naxalites, rowdies, goondas, and extortionists, with out extortion from andhra settlers, can we exist for single day? we can also abuse them in filtiest language, they are no mach to us, the other follow remarked
Re: Re: Honesty
by jet on Sep 29, 2011 02:08 AM
Jairaj one of the main heros when indian film industry started is born in karimnagar, telangana. He won dadasaheb falke award in 1980, but andhra rulers made sure that no body knows about him in AP.
This andhra Hazare and his cahoots from his caste want to spread that he a Gandhia. Its like you scratch my back and I will scratch Yours. But the Jagan Juggernaut is rolling them down beyond recognition throughout seema andhra. Pity these pathetic guys.
A quick/easiest way to get Telangana state is to print/circulate/use Telangana currency/banknotes exclusively among Telangana people. Google Filettino.
Madras presidency was not state,that was a revenue zone for britishers which was not made on any parameter.Andhra state agitation not against tammillians or others.Asked for divide part,has no other people or sufferers.Never emigrated from divided to madras presidency or from madras presidency to andhra part.One more issue proved who ask for divide can't claim existing capital.Rajaji not ordered like what separatists claiming.After that rajaji and N.G.ranga formed swatantra party.
Re: Andhra state madras presidency
by Kalyan Ram on Sep 21, 2011 03:02 PM
Rajaji was a great statesman and a freedom fighter, However our T separatists are attributing cheap remarks made on andhras to him. There was not even an iota of truth that rajaji gave 24hrs deadline to andhras to leave the then Madras. Similarly comments atributed to Nehru in Nizamabad were ridiculous. Great statesmen like Nehru and Rajaji who never used any bad language against even Britishers could use such a cheap T separatist language against andhra people. If Nehru's comments were true why her political heiress Smt Gandhi never approved for division of states. She bluntly refused to divide linguistic states. When India became free there were 11 large provinces and 650 pricipalities, there was a dire need to reorganize those colonial vestiges to make them viable administrative units. Language was choosen as a base for reorganization, as a result State reorganization Act was passed in 1956 and linguistic states were formed. T separatists have very poor historical sense.
Re: Andhra state madras presidency
by Kalyan Ram on Sep 21, 2011 03:02 PM
Rajaji was a great statesman and a freedom fighter, However our T separatists are attributing cheap remarks made on andhras to him. There was not even an iota of truth that rajaji gave 24hrs deadline to andhras to leave the then Madras. Similarly comments atributed to Nehru in Nizamabad were ridiculous. Great statesmen like Nehru and Rajaji who never used any bad language against even Britishers could use such a cheap T separatist language against andhra people. If Nehru's comments were true why her political heiress Smt Gandhi never approved for division of states. She bluntly refused to divide linguistic states. When India became free there were 11 large provinces and 650 pricipalities, there was a dire need to reorganize those colonial vestiges to make them viable administrative units. Language was choosen as a base for reorganization, as a result State reorganization Act was passed in 1956 and linguistic states were formed. T separatists have very poor historical sense.
Re: Andhra state madras presidency
by Kalyan Ram on Sep 21, 2011 03:03 PM
Rajaji was a great statesman and a freedom fighter, However our T separatists are attributing cheap remarks made on andhras to him. There was not even an iota of truth that rajaji gave 24hrs deadline to andhras to leave the then Madras. Similarly comments atributed to Nehru in Nizamabad were ridiculous. Great statesmen like Nehru and Rajaji who never used any bad language against even Britishers could use such a cheap T separatist language against andhra people. If Nehru's comments were true why her political heiress Smt Gandhi never approved for division of states. She bluntly refused to divide linguistic states. When India became free there were 11 large provinces and 650 pricipalities, there was a dire need to reorganize those colonial vestiges to make them viable administrative units. Language was choosen as a base for reorganization, as a result State reorganization Act was passed in 1956 and linguistic states were formed. T separatists have very poor historical sense.
Re: Re: Andhra state madras presidency
by Andra Donga on Sep 21, 2011 04:52 PM
Your cheap propaganda has no viewers.The whole world is aware of the cheating techniques that these seema andhra plundeers use. Misinformation used to the hilt.
Re: Re: Re: Andhra state madras presidency
by Andra Donga on Sep 21, 2011 05:16 PM
Peddapuram Ram, settler, settled in Mendhi Bazar do not spread lies. Are one of the eminent jurist in SKC committee.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Andhra state madras presidency
by Kalyan Ram on Sep 21, 2011 11:40 PM
For peddapuram failed dongas, tagubotus, State reorganizartion act 1956 is a lie, Indian independence is a lie, according to them, Nizam was a great ruler, and quasim Razvi was their foster father. Zinnah and osama were their roll models. I have born, brought up educated and employed in Hyd. I live in yakutpura and i have studied in Anwar ul uloom. I care a hoot for dongas and tagubotus, who came to city from the bilanes of peddapalli and machirial as drain cleaners
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Andhra state madras presidency
by Andra Donga on Sep 23, 2011 01:43 PM
Yes they were peddapuram Vangabonds and Peddapuram Money spinners in the muncipal quaters also reffered as B - Blocks. It was good time pass for telanganites coming and going back to Nalgonda with these peddapuram assets in full display.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Andhra state madras presidency
by Kalyan Ram on Sep 21, 2011 11:41 PM
For peddapuram failed dongas, tagubotus, State reorganizartion act 1956 is a lie, Indian independence is a lie, according to them, Nizam was a great ruler, and quasim Razvi was their foster father. Zinnah and osama were their roll models. I have born, brought up educated and employed in Hyd. I live in yakutpura and i have studied in Anwar ul uloom. I care a hoot for dongas and tagubotus, who came to city from the bilanes of peddapalli and machirial as drain cleaners
Indian guru is definetly looks ignorant about composition of the government in AP.Not even one government since 1956 could get formed in AP with out active participation and involvement of telangana MLAs . No party could gather mejority by itself with seema andhra MLAs alone.40% of ministers were always from telangana.How can you infer that andhras alone ruled AP because they are 2/3rd in assembly( but they belong to different parties).
Basically democracy works based on mejority in assembly. It was never decided by andhra MLAs alone.
Regarding officers , the IAS guys belong to all india cadres and hence you can not impute motives to them. Further it is now clear after strike by telangana employees that 100 % of the employees in telangana districts are from telangana and telangana alone.otherwise , how is that the strike is 100% succees. If andhra employees are there , they would have definetly rebelled.
telangana developed enormously after 1956. Educated people jumped from 5% to 45% in these 60 years while in andhra region the jump is from 30% to 50%. In agriculture , the jump is over 1000% because pumpset irrigation caught on in telangana. No one pays for electricity and bank loans towards pumpsets/others are always waived off.70% of these benifits meant for AP are always diverted to telangana.Srikrishna commission studied all these and nailed the bad propaganda of separatists point by point. 80% of hyderabad revenue is due to andhra residents
Re: ignorant guru
by UsualSuspect on Sep 20, 2011 11:18 PM
What bullsh!t are you talking about ? Telangana only has 119 MLAs out of a total of 295. Non-Telangana MLAs can easily pass any bill in their favor. Plus non-Telangana people have occupied the Chief Minister chair since 1956 for 90% of the time either due to money or muscle power. When both legislative body and executive are in non-Telangana control, how can Telangana expect to get justice ?
Re: Re: ignorant guru
by National Highway on Sep 21, 2011 12:27 AM
1. Telagana politicians occupies CM chair from 1971-82 (PVN to Anjaiah) and then 89-90, which is 12 years out of 56 years. Does this equate to 10% of time? 2. AP has seen development only in last 20 years and that to in Hyderabad. CBN and YSR from Seema were responsible for the development. Seema is the least developed region in AP. Since there is no relation between where CM come from and development in that region, why should a common care which region CM come from? 3. The logic majority MLAs worked in 1969 agitation because there was only one party, Congress, at that time. Since 1983, we have two parties in the state. Can give me a single example where MLAs voted in assembly on the regional basis? If telangana formed, the MPs from telangana would be only 17 out 540plus MPs, how telangana would justice then in parliament? Politicians are cheaters and have love for any regions. So fight against bad politicians without worry where they come from. If Anna Hazare had thought like, he would have asked for a separate state for his region in Maharashtra than fight against corruption in whole India.
Re: Re: Re: ignorant guru
by Ram Online on Sep 21, 2011 02:19 AM
Jalagana vengal Rao is Andhra migrant. He is as Telanganite as Kiran Kumar reddy.
PV ruled fro 1 year(1972), Chenna Reddy ruled for 2years(78-80), Anjayya(80-81) ruled for 1years; Cehnnareddy ruled for 1year (89-90). Total of around 6years in last 55years. Its close to around 10%.
Since TDP emerged in 1983, only 1year is ruled by Telangana CM.
Re: Re: Re: Re: ignorant guru
by idea on Sep 21, 2011 07:04 AM
KCR and Jalagam fore fathers lived in srikakulam.you are saying KCR telangana,jalagam andhra.where are you man?
Irrespetive of all the chat by the detractors of Telangana. Telangana is a must and has to be a separate state, if it has to see any shades of development and growth in future.
The reason behind the backwardness of Telangana is the skewed ration in the AP Assembly.. The practical reality of biased and skewed nature is evidently visible.
The CM, Governor, Speaker, PCC president, the police and administrative top brass are all people from non Telangana region, who treat this issue like a law & order problem, whereas the practical reality is different and all Telangana people want is a separate state i.e. Geographical separation.
The center sings the tune of the people from Non-Telangana region
Unless Telangana is formed as a separate state, there will be no development in this area..
Development occurs, when there are opportunities and options available. Policy descisions for growth and development are taken by the CM and the government in TOTO and Telangana has just namesake represenation and nothing else.
This Telangana movement will not end till a separate state is achieved. The whole of Andhra Pradesh and India, will face a developmental blockade, if this issue is kept in suspended animation..
The mental rift between Telangana and Non-Telangana region is reaching its cresendo and is in no mood to subside. If that unleashes its complete fury, then there will be no place for people from Non-Telangana regions forever in this region.
Re: Telangana State a must
by satyananda rao on Sep 20, 2011 10:31 PM
people like you will be driven out of hyderabad if you try to devide telugus . If you think that you can distroy telugus , we know how to prevent the same . All these fake gurus should stop sermonising in AP which was formed on linguistic lines for telugus.
Re: Re: Telangana State a must
by Andra Donga on Sep 20, 2011 11:00 PM
Time has arrived to kick out asathyamites out of Hyderabad who are lingual fanatics and tarnish the secular image of Hyderabad.
Re: Re: Re: Telangana State a must
by National Highway on Sep 21, 2011 12:35 AM
Practise what you preach. Please come out of regional fanaticism before giving advice to others. Off course any advice to you is like blowing whistle in a deaf ear.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Telangana State a must
by Raj Patel on Sep 21, 2011 03:06 AM
I heard regionalism started with Andhras first by demanding a sepearate state from Madras province. How can you blame people from Telangana?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Telangana State a must
by Andra Donga on Sep 21, 2011 05:00 PM
Andhras never had a city when they were kicked out of Madras Presidency. They Hyderabad in order to possess a city. As a matter of fact, the pathetic state of their condition was, that they functioned from the torn tents and rickety furniture and with junk typewriters as interim seema andhra capital.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Telangana State a must
by National Highway on Sep 21, 2011 11:56 AM
Andhra and other states formed so far sacrificed their share in parental state capital. So If telanagana wants to copy them, then why don't it give up its claim in Hyd.
Morover according to your logic, India got independence from British so it cann't object to Kashmir and any other state that may ask for independence.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Telangana State a must
by jet on Sep 29, 2011 02:16 AM
some andhras, stupidly comparing a state issue to a separatis issue like kashmir which is a threat to integrity of india. This shows what kind of cunning and faltu people some of them are.
