Discussion Board

Act against LeT, prevent another 26/11: US told Pak


Total 19 messages Pages | 1 | 2   Older >
alok srivastava
Hillary has cracked a joke
by alok srivastava on May 21, 2011 12:27 PM

"and could risk a stronger Indian response than that which occurred after Mumbai"

What was the indian response post 26/11.....?can anybody put some light on this as i dont think india had responded strongly and have strong believe that we dont have guts to tackle our terror supporter rotten neighbours.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Jai Shriram
Re
by Jai Shriram on May 21, 2011 12:22 PM

It is a shame that USA is asking pakistan to behave and india repeatedly saying that talks would continue with pakistan!
Our all efforts are in direction of USA declaring pakistan a terrorist state whereas we ourselves have granted them MFN (irrespective of context, see the anomaly here) status to pakistan, which they have not given us till date as they keep on saying that we are their enemy # 1!
At no level, we have given a befitting reply to pakistan. Even when pakistani diplomats attacked india, our diplomats and FM looked other way and forced me think if these stooge are good enough even to be a peon!
I believe UPA is sold to pakistan and MMS and his cohorts will do everything to bring india at par with pakistan to force a one-sided settlement of unfinished agenda of partition in favor of pakistan while keeping second (while is likely to become largest) largest population of muslims in india!
In its more than 50 years of rule in india, congress has created a structure, that would eventually destroy india from within like cancer.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
parameswaran K
Pak & terror
by parameswaran K on May 21, 2011 12:11 PM  | Hide replies

I have writen several msgs in the past in these columns on the subject. I repeat that sin ce Pak does not produce anything, the only thing they can export is terror. Is there any other country in the world where terrorists camps are held? For Pak, under Zia-ul Haq, Islam came very handy for creating terror network in the name of Allah and Quoran. The only solution to this, elimination of Pak from the map of the world. It is a rogue State and should be renamed Terroristan.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
sukhmeet singh
Re: Pak & terror
by sukhmeet singh on May 21, 2011 12:18 PM
ISI is the hub of terrorist activities in pak and is funding Al-qaida, Let etc. Shud be internationally banned

   Forward   |   Report abuse
R B
Really?
by R B on May 21, 2011 01:14 AM

"and could risk a stronger Indian response than that which occurred after Mumbai"

So if last time there was angry talk, the next time there will be swear words in the Indian response?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
secret
LET
by secret on May 20, 2011 09:45 PM

is a covert arm of ISI for spreading terror. So they are actors of a terrorist state, not the non-state actors.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Bigtribe
US money is bloodthirsty
by Bigtribe on May 20, 2011 04:52 PM

US must make fullstop to give money to Pakistan or other organisation. Money sent is used for training terror camps in Pakistan, ISI buying weapons...US irrsponsible nation. Their own money has haunted them and will haunt them in the future...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Ramadas
US has to stop this pretense
by Ramadas on May 20, 2011 03:57 PM

Just as Pakistan is in denial of every terrorist act happening in Pakistan and its neighbourhood, US pretends to be ignorant of who the culprit is it; is time to say it as it is.

The entire world knows Pakistan is behind every act of terrorism. The harbouring of Osama reveals how deeply they are involved in terrorism. US knew Pakistan's duplicity and so had to act without Pakistan's knowledge to get Osama.

US will lose its crediblity if it does not give up this pretense.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Andromeda
Re: dirty islam
by Andromeda on May 20, 2011 03:45 PM
LOL nice. :)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 19 messages Pages: | 1 | 2   Older >
Write a message