we do not require governor or president posts they are drain to national exchequer .directly elected president or prime minister is enough .same apply to states also chief minister directly elected will do the job.these governors and president posts are ment for politicians who are old,useless and trouble creators are appointed so to get rid of them from powerful ministers' way.
because karnatak is another big state ready for a take off under the bjp govt. a successful developed karnatak will prove it beyond doubt that the hindu people under a hindu govt will create new world records in development, much less in india. anti hindu congressis know this too well. hence it has been creating hurdles and throwing sand in the well oiled bjp govt machineriy in both gujarat and karnataka. the writing is on the wall, and congress is on the deathbed. congress can care less if there is a rebellion in states against central federal union as this marks the 3rd year in karantak paralysis.
why yeddi or his govt given ultimatum to governor? it is himself which he is to serve an ultimatum to of abusing the Indian Constitution and the law of the land. he is a joker who doesn't know the seriousness of the law and encouraging the mass to disregard the law and constitution. what a shame to our country.
Re: CM vs Guv
by naayikunni on May 24, 2011 01:25 AM
you are absolutely correct about yeddy. guv should have shown some patience as the inevitable will happen to yeddy govt
