The great man, of whom now we enjoy holiday on his birthday date 2nd october, who went into fasting when the civil riots started, at the time of partition. Had he not gone for fasting, what would have happened that time?
Re: Was that a mistake?
by Sachin kaushal on Feb 03, 2011 07:19 PM
US invaded iraq & afghanistan calling it war on terror. has terror ended? no. using might may be a mean but talk is the only weapon that can set up peace.
Re: Re: Was that a mistake?
by truth serum on Feb 03, 2011 07:41 PM
Talk peace with Jihadis? Utter nonsense. If the US lets them have it with full might, there will be non Jihadis left in Pak and Af.
Re: Re: Was that a mistake?
by ramakrishnan s on Feb 03, 2011 07:28 PM
Was there an attack in the US after they invaded afganistan? Again, When someones kills you people, you want to talk. They will say give kashmir to us. Would you? Then they might say we want other parts of india. So would you give it?
The traitor has conferred first rights on the infiltrators. When he looses sleep even when a suspected j0h0di is arrested outside india. So we can imagine his plight and anguish if johodis are obstructed or hurt in any manner. In deference to the wishes of the traitor sitting in the PM's chair, the security forces might have downplayed the issue.
Re: Too simple!
by some one on Feb 03, 2011 07:17 PM
Making strong comments is not useful. One has to go and fight the enemy where ever they live. Strong words do not kill enemies. Indians treat words as actions, which is just be-fooling themselves.
Re: Re: Too simple!
by subramanyasastry hoskote on Feb 03, 2011 07:30 PM
I was talking about the traitor nurturing the j0h0dis and not about fighting them. I am timid to become a j0h0di myself and blow up disconnected people around me. Basically my anger is not against the j0h0dis but the anti india conparty led by the it0li0n and the traitor nominated by her as the PM. My purpose of writing is to make sure that people who are not indoctrinated as yet don't get in the future.
Indian foreign policy makers and its executors are set of people,who can sacrifice the safety of common man for sake of having diologue with Pakistan.And the most surprising thing is they always loose on the negotiating table.
Re: Why ?
by Sunit Kumar on Feb 03, 2011 06:27 PM
Or may be because one needs to be secular, dont know what's the colour of secularism, Dark Green, OLIVE green, Greenish Ting, Turquoise Green.... dont know but yaa any shade of Orange is bad !!
Re: India is a HR violater
by Batao Na on Feb 03, 2011 07:10 PM
Moron he is talking of Afgan-pak pashtun tribal whome US is bombing. Word tribal has a very different meaning in Pakistan
these impotents ruled immediately after 1947 & made the nation a mess. they looted the nation making swiss banks billionaires while poor person died of hunger.
The only infiltration they were worried about was the one by Indian citizens to a state that is an integral part of India. Their infiltration was not hidden agenda. They went public about their agenda to hoist flag in Lal Chowk. They did not resort to violence. Yet, apparently their infiltration to J&K was considered more dangerous than the one by the guys from across the border.
Re: Simple..
by swetambar on Feb 03, 2011 07:11 PM
It is as difficult as stopping fake id buffoons from writing this kind of traitor stuff on rediff forum
