Discussion Board

Before 26/11, India had warned US on 'white' terror


Total 113 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Anuraug Rathor
Diggy and Raul
by Anuraug Rathor on Feb 03, 2011 11:08 PM

Diggy and Raul will now send a cable asking the US not to worry about white recruits in the jihadi camps.Rather they should concentrate on Hindu terror which is the worst kind of terror in the world.Bin Laden phoned Diggy and conveyed this.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Herry
USA can take care of itself
by Herry on Feb 03, 2011 11:00 PM  | Hide replies

USA can take care of itself, they do not have any attack since last 10 years.
And India warned US - WHAT A JOKE.
WE cant even secure our country and warning others.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
rishideo mishra
Re: USA can take care of itself
by rishideo mishra on Feb 03, 2011 11:11 PM
Yes my dear friend. It is some thing like here we find photographs and details the terrorist have moved from this place to that place means i will catch hold and these politicians/ IPS/IAS will enjoy perks.salary/pension and mota pet. ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
secret
Re: USA can take care of itself
by secret on Feb 03, 2011 11:16 PM
Joke is the traitors who are ruling our country. These traitors feel that India has bigger threat from Saffron.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Lucky B
Congressis Indian government
by Lucky B on Feb 03, 2011 10:31 PM

Congressis are sick, they see color in terror.

Sometimes I wonder, when Congressi will learn that there is no color of terror or humanity.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
strong_hindu@rediffmail.com
there was no attack on US...
by strong_hindu@rediffmail.com on Feb 03, 2011 10:31 PM  | Hide replies

there was attack on INDIA...

why did they did with information...make pakodas???????????

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Lucky B
Re: there was no attack on US...
by Lucky B on Feb 03, 2011 10:33 PM
all attackers call Diggi and take permission from Madam, then executed by RAW.

As per seculars, there is no terrorist from land of pure.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
E darwin
now the videshi even want to "racial"iz
by E darwin on Feb 03, 2011 10:21 PM  | Hide replies

hijack of the 1947 struggle where S C Bose was involved

not all revolution happen by guns, 1947 indian revolution was hijacked by enemies otherwise we would have direct election of PM/CM by people, direct impeachment power to people. term limits to PM/CM and much more.

religion fanatics or military dictators exploit people's faith and they lead to anarchy and despots who live dual life like in middle-east and elsewhere.


...
Hope Egypt revolution is not hijacked quite like how indian 1947 revolution was hijacked.

today, videshi control almost all key recruiting directly or indirectly (by their network ) in Middle-east, Central Asia, etc.

they appoint only and only their most obedient diversity or local slaves. rest they disqualify.

anyone who speaks up against videshi control is blacklisted and shunned.

So a democracy should be end result of revolution with real freedom and not a control of vested interests.



    Forward  |  Report abuse
rishideo mishra
Re: now the videshi even want to "racial&quo
by rishideo mishra on Feb 03, 2011 11:14 PM
Be aware one day will come when the people of India also will come out on road like Egypt. And these politicians /IAS/IPS will go out and land in London

   Forward   |   Report abuse
E darwin
Re: now the videshi even want to "racial&quo
by E darwin on Feb 03, 2011 10:22 PM
videshi gave fake jail sentence and thus the videshi planted dynasty and brokers as leaders over and above chandrashekar azad, bhagat singh, rajguru, etc. they were not brokers and vested deal makers like nehrus, gandhis, etc. the efforts of real revolutionaries/fighters were hijacked videshi and their diversity/desi slaves planted.

those who really stood for india were killed directly or indirectly.


infact, the vested interest gave "fake extended sentence" to their pawn Dr. Sen (created waves in desi/videshi media).

Even projected K gandhi(showed his meetings in Nepal) as revolutionary to control any revolution if it happens from the very beginning.

they wont allow RED leaders V.I.Lenin, ChairmanMao, FidelCastro or non-RED revolutionaries.

indian conditions need indian revolutionaries/fighter who will employ tactics of chandrashekar azad, bhagat singh, rajguru, etc. And not let the results of their fight be hijacked.

even Karat was invited to videsh so he is setup into the kickback circus for leftist in which bjp-congress brokers are already dipping.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
E darwin
Re: now the videshi even want to "racial&quo
by E darwin on Feb 03, 2011 10:24 PM
videshi even want to "racial"ize and control radicals, were the zionist not doing it already?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
whatswrongpeople
Now
by whatswrongpeople on Feb 03, 2011 06:24 PM  | Hide replies

Earlier Saffron Terror ! Chidu sir ! whats tommorow !

    Forward  |  Report abuse
secret
Re: Now
by secret on Feb 03, 2011 09:46 PM
Chidu will claim that all of the above are saffron terrorists.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Balan Iyer
What A Paradox
by Balan Iyer on Feb 03, 2011 04:59 PM  | Hide replies

Sitting on hot and smouldering coal,we raised
fire alarm for others!Same goes for our warning
to USA about White Terrorism,when we were bliss
fully ignorant as David Headly merrily moved
about in India hobnobbing with high profile
people.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
secret
Re: What A Paradox
by secret on Feb 03, 2011 09:47 PM
Indians are too stupid to believe that whites were planning to attack whites. Wake up you morons. This is a global Jihad.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
aaaa
Re: Re: What A Paradox
by aaaa on Feb 03, 2011 10:23 PM
Moron it is not white's attacking white's but Islums who look like whites are using their looks to evade suspision at the checkpoints

   Forward   |   Report abuse
secret
Re: Re: Re: What A Paradox
by secret on Feb 03, 2011 11:13 PM
Dumbo, when the issue of attack, word Muslim is not needed. It is understood.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
secret
Re: Re: Re: Re: What A Paradox
by secret on Feb 03, 2011 11:14 PM
issue is

   Forward   |   Report abuse
amar
Islam cannot withstand scrutiny and Freedom.Examples
by amar on Feb 03, 2011 04:46 PM  | Hide replies

Saudi Arabia – Conversion by a Muslim to another religion is punishable by death.. It is punishable by death for a non-mulsim to enter the “holy” muslim cities of Medina and Mecca.

Yemen – Bans proselytizing by non-Muslims and forbids conversions. The Government does not allow the building of new non-Muslim places of worship.

Kuwait – Registration and licensing of religious groups. Members of religions not sanctioned in the Koran may not build places of worship. Prohibits organized religious education for religions other than Islam.

Egypt – Islam is the official state religion and primary source of legislation. Accordingly, religious practices that conflict with Islamic law are prohibited. Muslims may face legal problems if they convert to another faith. Requires non-Muslims to obtain what is now a presidential decree to build a place of worship.

Algeria – The law prohibits public assembly for purposes of practicing a faith other than Islam. Non-Islamic proselytizing is illegal, and the Government restricts the importation of non-Islamic literature for distribution. The country has passed the “Regulation of Religious Practice” law, which stipulates a punishment of two to five years’ imprisonment and heavy fines for anyone convicted of urging a Muslim to change his religion.
Syria – The constitution requires the president

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
amar
Re: Islam cannot withstand scrutiny and Freedom.Examples
by amar on Feb 03, 2011 04:49 PM
Qatar – Islamic instruction is compulsory in public schools. The government regulates the publication, importation, and distribution of non-Islamic religious literature. The government continues to prohibit proselytizing of Muslims by non-Muslims.

Malaysia – Under Malaysian law, any convert to Christianity must apply to a shariah (Muslim law) court to legally renounce Islam. Many Christians prefer to remain silent converts rather than take their battle to the shariah courts, where apostasy or conversion out of Islam is punishable by whipping, fines, imprisonment.
.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
whatswrongpeople
Re: Islam cannot withstand scrutiny and Freedom.Examples
by whatswrongpeople on Feb 03, 2011 06:26 PM
In India you can rape, murder, bomb do anything ! our soooo secular govt wont say anything ! huhuhehehhe

   Forward   |   Report abuse
rishideo mishra
Re: Re: Islam cannot withstand scrutiny and Freedom.Examples
by rishideo mishra on Feb 03, 2011 11:20 PM
THIS IS GOVERNMENT GOBAR MEANT. NO SARKAR

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Total 113 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message